Cases within A

• expand

  Allonby v Accrington & Rossendale College and others [2004] IRLR 224 ECJ (1 report relating to this case)

  • Agency worker is entitled to membership of pension scheme

    Date:

    1 March 2004

    In Allonby v Accrington & Rossendale College and others, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) rules that a lecturer employed through an agency could not claim equal pay with lecturers employed directly by the college, but she could claim entitlement to join the lecturers' statutory pension scheme even though it was open only to those with a contract of employment.

• expand

  Allsop v North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council [1992] 90 LGR 462 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Allsop v North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council

    Date:

    14 April 1992

    In Allsop v North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council [1992] 90 LGR 462 CA, the Court of Appeal held that payments made to employees by a local authority as compensation for redundancy under a voluntary severance scheme were unlawful as they exceeded the prescribed limits.

• expand

  ALM Medical Services Ltd v Bladon [2002] IRLR 807 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Public interest disclosure: Statutory elements of "protected disclosure" must be proved

    Date:

    10 January 2003

    Where, in a protected disclosure case, the employee had not served the requisite qualifying period to bring an unfair dismissal complaint, the critical issue for the tribunal is whether or not the protected disclosure provisions in the Employment Rights Act 1996 have been satisfied on the evidence, and not substantive or procedural unfairness, which would have been the central issue in a claim for "ordinary" unfair dismissal, the Court of Appeal holds in ALM Medical Services Ltd v Bladon.

• expand

  Amicus and another v City Building (Glasgow) LLP and others [2009] IRLR 253 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • TUPE: Duty to consult ends with transfer

    Date:

    25 March 2009

    In Amicus and another v City Building (Glasgow) LLP and others [2009] IRLR 253 EAT, the EAT held that, after a transfer, the transferee employer is not obliged to consult with representatives of the transferred employees in respect of the measures that it proposes to take.

• expand

  Amicus v GBS Tooling Ltd (in administration) [2005] IRLR 683 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Redundancy: Protective award reduced to reflect information given

    Date:

    30 September 2005

    In Amicus v GBS Tooling Ltd (in administration), the EAT holds that, under s.189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, to make a protective award against an employer in respect of breaches of s.188, an employment tribunal is entitled and obliged to assess the seriousness of the breach, taking into account its nature and any mitigating circumstances.

• expand

  Amicus v Macmillan Publishers Ltd [2007] IRLR 885 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Information and consultation: Penalty imposed for serious breach

    Date:

    15 October 2007

    Where the Central Arbitration Committee has found an employer to be in breach of certain obligations under the Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004, the EAT may order the employer to pay a financial penalty to the secretary of state. In the first case to arise on this point, Amicus v MacMillan Publishers Ltd EAT/0185/07, the EAT ordered the employer to pay £55,000 in respect of a "very grave" breach.

• expand

  Amicus v Nissan Motor Manufacturing (UK) Limited EAT/0184/05 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Collective redundancies: Late consultation with union still 'in good time'

    Date:

    20 January 2006

    In Amicus v Nissan Motor Manufacturing (UK) Ltd, the EAT holds that the tribunal was correct to find that consultation by an employer proposing to relocate 62 employees took place "in good time", despite the fact that the employer failed to consult the union until three weeks before the affected employees had to indicate their willingness to be relocated.

• expand

  Ampadu v Mullane [1994] IT/33530/94 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Sacked for objecting to racist video

    Date:

    1 March 1995

    A bar worker dismissed for complaining about the playing of a video recording which included racist jokes was unlawfully discriminated against, rules a Manchester industrial tribunal (Chair: J M Q Hepworth) in Ampadu v Mullane.

• expand

  Anderson and others v South Tyneside Council [2005] All ER (D) 91 (Jun) EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Points of procedure

    Date:

    30 December 2005

    A review of recent significant cases on practice and procedure in the tribunals, EAT, Court of Appeal and Court of Session.

• expand

  Anderson v Jarvis Hotels EATS/0062/05 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Anderson v Jarvis Hotels

    Date:

    23 July 2006

    In Anderson v Jarvis Hotels EATS/0062/05, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that an employee was contractually entitled to be paid for periods when he was required to sleep on the employer's premises, even though he rarely had to carry out any work during these periods.