-
expand
Brunnhofer v Bank der Österreichischen Postsparkasse AG [2001] IRLR 571 ECJ
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 2 March 2007
This article looks at some of the significant judgments in the area of equal pay over the past year and their implications.
-
- Date:
- 15 September 2001
In Brunnhofer v Bank der osterreichischen Postsparkasse AG1 the European Court of Justice rules that in comparing the pay of men and women for the purposes of an equal pay claim, the fact that the employees concerned are classified in the same job category under a collective agreement is not in itself sufficient to lead to a conclusion that they perform the same work or work of equal value.
-
expand
Buckland v Bournemouth University Higher Education Corporation [2010] IRLR 445 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 5 May 2010
In Buckland v Bournemouth University Higher Education Corporation [2010] EWCA Civ 121 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the "range of reasonable responses" test has no place in a tribunal's determination of whether or not there was a repudiatory breach of contract by the employer and constructive dismissal. It also held that such a breach cannot be "cured", so as to prevent the innocent party accepting the breach.
-
expand
Bull and another v Nottinghamshire and City of Nottingham Fire and Rescue Authority; Lincolnshire County Council v Fire Brigades Union and others [2007] All ER (D) 372 (Feb) CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 20 March 2007
In Bull and another v Nottinghamshire and City of Nottingham Fire and Rescue Authority; Lincolnshire County Council v Fire Brigades Union and others [2007] All ER (D) 372 (Feb) CA, the Court of Appeal has held that it is not part of fire-fighters' normal contractual duties under a collective agreement to go to accidents and emergencies that would normally be dealt with by ambulance crews.
-
expand
Bull v Pitney Bowes Ltd [1966] 2 All ER 384 HC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 31 December 1966
In Bull v Pitney Bowes Ltd [1966] 2 All ER 384 HC, the High Court held that clauses in restraint of trade are void unless the employer can show that they are no more than is required to protect its interests, but even then, if the employee can show that the clause is contrary to the public interest, it remains void and unenforceable.
-
expand
Bunce v Postworth Ltd t/a Skyblue [2005] IRLR 557 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 24 June 2005
In Bunce v Postworth Ltd (t/a Skyblue), the Court of Appeal holds that, in certain circumstances, there may be an umbrella agreement governing the relationship between a worker and an employment agency, alongside individual, separate contracts in respect of specific assignments for the agency's clients.
-
expand
Bungay and others v Saini and others EAT/0331/10
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Bunning v G T Bunning and Sons Limited [2005] EWCA Civ 104 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Burlo v Langley and another [2007] IRLR 145 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Burns v Consignia plc (No.2) [2004] IRLR 425 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Burrett v West Birmingham Health Authority [1994] IRLR 7 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 January 1994
In Burrett v West Birmingham Health Authority the EAT upholds an industrial tribunal's decision that a female nurse, disciplined for refusing to wear a starched linen cap which male nurses did not have to wear, was not treated less favourably on grounds of sex.