-
expand
Bamsey and others v Albon Engineering & Manufacturing plc [2004] IRLR 457 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 June 2004
In Bamsey and others v Albon Engineering & Manufacturing plc [2004] IRLR 457 CA, the Court of Appeal held that where overtime hours have been worked during the 12-week period immediately preceding the date on which a worker's holiday begins only those hours that the employer is contractually required to provide and the worker contractually required to work count as normal working hours for the purposes of determining the amount of a week's pay.
-
expand
Banerjee v City & East London Area Health Authority [1979] IRLR 147 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 18 July 1979
The Court of Appeal held, in Hollister v National Farmers' Union, that Mr Hollister's dismissal for refusing to accept the terms of a re-organisation amounted to some other substantial reason for dismissal. And in Banerjee v City & East London AHA, the EAT overturned an Industrial Tribunal's decision that Mr Banerjee's dismissal from his post of part-time consultant surgeon following a decision to replace part-timers with full-timers was for some other substantial reason.
-
expand
Bangs v Connex South Eastern Ltd [2005] IRLR 389 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA (in compulsory liquidation) v Ali and others (No.3) [1999] IRLR 508 HC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 September 1999
In Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA (in compulsory liquidation) v Ali and others (No.3), the High Court holds that BCCI's dishonest conduct was sufficiently serious to amount to a breach by the bank of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence in the contracts of employment of all its former employees.
-
expand
Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA (in liquidation) v Ali and others (No 3) [2002] IRLR 460 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 21 February 2003
In Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA (in liquidation) v Ali and others (No.3), the Court of Appeal holds that, where a claimant alleges that stigma resulting from his or her previous employment affected his or her employment prospects, it was for him or her to prove that the stigma had a real or substantial effect on his or her obtaining employment.
-
expand
Barber and others v RJB Mining (UK) Ltd [1999] IRLR 308 HC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 April 1999
In making the Working Time Regulations, Parliament intended that all contracts of employment must be read so as to provide that an employee should work no more than an average of 48 hours per week during any 17-week reference period, holds the High Court in Barber and others v RJB Mining (UK) Ltd.
-
expand
Barber v Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance Group [1990] IRLR 240 ECJ
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 2 March 2007
This article looks at some of the significant judgments in the area of equal pay over the past year and their implications.
-
- Date:
- 19 June 1990
The European Court of Justice holds that occupational pensions payable under a contracted-out scheme constitute "pay" under Article 119 of the Treaty of Rome, and so must be offered to men and women on equal terms.
-
expand
Barclays Bank plc v Kapur and others (No.2) [1995] IRLR 87 CA
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 December 1994
East African Asian employees of a UK bank who were required to waive their right to have their African service with a "group" employer credited for pension purposes, had not suffered race discrimination, holds the Court of Appeal in Barclays Bank plc v Kapur and others.
-
- Date:
- 1 December 1994
An industrial tribunal erred in finding that there had been direct racial discrimination in the absence of a finding that the reason for the treatment complained of was race-based, rules the Court of Appeal in Barclays Bank plc v Kapur and others (No.2).
-
expand
Barke v Seetec Business Technology Centre Ltd [2005] IRLR 633 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Barry v Midland Bank plc [1995] IT/52983/93
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 September 1995
In Barry v Midland Bank plc a London South industrial tribunal (Chair: E R Donnelly) rules that a voluntary severance payment scheme, which failed to take account any full-time service a part-time worker may have had, was not unlawfully indirectly discriminatory because most women worked full-time rather than part-time.