-
expand
Barry v Midland Bank plc [1997] ICR 192 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 May 1997
In Barry v Midland Bank plc, the EAT holds that a woman bank employee was not indirectly discriminated against on the ground of her sex when the bank calculated her severance pay by reference to her part-time salary at the time of termination, notwithstanding that she had been employed full time for the first 11 years of her 13 years' service.
-
expand
Barry v Midland Bank plc [1999] IRLR 581 HL
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 September 1999
Calculating severance payments by reference to length of service and final pay, so that a part-time employee who had previously worked full time did not have her full-time service reflected in her severance payment, was not discriminatory, holds the House of Lords in Barry v Midland Bank plc.
-
expand
Bartholomew v London Borough of Hackney [1999] IRLR 246 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 July 1999
An employer did not act in breach of its common law duty of care in providing a reference for a former employee which stated that, when he had taken voluntary severance, he was suspended from work because of a charge of gross misconduct, but that disciplinary proceedings had lapsed automatically when his employment terminated, holds the Court of Appeal in Bartholomew v London Borough of Hackney.
-
expand
Barton v Investec Henderson Crosthwaite Securities Ltd [2003] IRLR 332 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 3 July 2003
In Barton v Investec Henderson Crosthwaite Securities Ltd, the EAT holds that by the insertion of the new section 63A into the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, a "shifting" burden of proof is introduced into sex discrimination claims, making it necessary to set out fresh guidance as to the correct approach for employment tribunals to take.
-
expand
Barton v Wandsworth Council [1995] ET/11268/94
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 31 December 1995
In Barton v Wandsworth Council [1995] ET/11268/94, an employment tribunal ruled that an ambulance driver employed by the technical services division of a local authority was subjected to detriment when, in circumstances of danger that he reasonably believed to be serious and imminent, he took appropriate steps to protect himself or other persons from danger.
-
expand
Bass Taverns Ltd v Burgess [1995] IRLR 596 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Bateman and others v Asda Stores Ltd [2010] IRLR 370 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Baxter and others v Marks & Spencer and others [2005] All ER (D) 26 (Oct) EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Bayode v The Chief Constable of Derbyshire EAT/0499/07
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 11 August 2008
In Bayode v The Chief Constable of Derbyshire EAT/0499/07, the EAT held that, where alleged less favourable treatment consisted of accurate written records made by colleagues in their personal notebooks about aspects of a black police officer's behaviour that were of concern to them, the employment tribunal was entitled to find on the facts that the officer had no justified sense of grievance about the making of the entries and therefore had not suffered any detriment.
-
expand
BBC Scotland v Souster [2001] IRLR 150 CS
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 February 2001
The meaning of "national origins" in the Race Relations Act 1976 is not limited to the concept of nationality in a legal sense, and thus to the citizenship that an individual may acquire at birth, holds the Inner House, Court of Session in BBC Scotland v Souster.