Cases within C

• expand

  City of Edinburgh Council v Dickson EATS/0038/09 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Unfair dismissal: Failure properly to consider explanation of uncharacteristic behaviour during hypoglycaemic episode resulted in unfair dismissal

    Date:

    1 June 2010

    In City of Edinburgh Council v Dickson EATS/0038/09, the EAT upheld the employment tribunal's decision that an employee whose employer failed properly to consider his explanation that he had behaved out of character during a hypoglycaemic episode was unfairly dismissed. However, the tribunal's conclusion that the employer's rejection of that explanation amounted to direct and disability-related discrimination was wrong in law and was overturned.

• expand

  City of Edinburgh Council v Wilkinson and others [2012] IRLR 202 CS (1 report relating to this case)

  • Female local authority workers employed on "common terms and conditions" with male comparators

    Date:

    28 November 2011

    The Court of Session has held that a group of administrative and clerical female workers making equal pay claims against a local authority were on "common terms and conditions" with a group of male manual workers who were based in different locations. 

• expand

  Clamp v Aerial Systems EAT/0266/04 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Working time: No detriment following withdrawal from opt-out

    Date:

    28 January 2005

    In Clamp v Aerial Systems, the EAT holds that, in a case where the applicant withdrew his consent to opt out of the maximum 48-hour week set by the Working Time Regulations 1998, the applicant had not suffered a detriment within the meaning of s.45A of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

• expand

  Claridge v Daler Rowney Ltd [2008] IRLR 672 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Constructive dismissal: Handling of grievance procedure is subject to the range of reasonable responses test

    Date:

    3 November 2008

    In Claridge v Daler Rowney Ltd [2008] IRLR 672, the EAT held that, although it is for the tribunal to determine whether or not an employer has committed a repudiatory breach of contract, the employer's handling of the grievance procedure will amount to such a breach only where it fell outside the range of reasonable responses open to the employer.

• expand

  Clark v BET plc and another [1997] IRLR 348 HC (1 report relating to this case)

  • Wrongful dismissal: Damages awarded for loss of salary increases

    Date:

    15 January 1997

    The service contract of a company chief executive imposed a contractual obligation on his employer to review and provide an annual upward adjustment in salary, holds the High Court in Clark v BET plc and another.

• expand

  Clark v Fahrenheit 451 (Communications) Ltd EAT/591/99 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Clark v Fahrenheit 451 (Communications) Ltd

    Date:

    31 December 1999

    In Clark v Fahrenheit 451 (Communications) Ltd EAT/591/99, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that, where a contract contains no express notice clause and it is implied that it can be terminated by giving a reasonable period of notice, what is a reasonable period of notice is a question of mixed fact and law and depends on the circumstances.

• expand

  Clark v Nomura International plc [2000] IRLR 766 HC (1 report relating to this case)

  • Contracts of employment: Decision to award nil discretionary bonus was breach of contract

    Date:

    15 October 2000

    A contractual discretion whether or not to award an equity trader any, and if so what, bonus, which was "dependent upon individual performance", was one that had to be exercised both by reference to an assessment of performance of the trader's contract and not irrationally or perversely, holds the High Court in Clark v Nomura International plc.

• expand

  Clarke and others v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council; Wilson and others v Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council [2006] IRLR 324 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Conciliation agreements: Validity of Acas-conciliated agreements upheld

    Date:

    4 August 2006

    In Clarke and others v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council; Wilson and others v Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council [2006] IRLR 324 EAT, the Employment Appeal Tribunal holds that there is no duty on an Acas conciliation officer to advise on the merits of a claim before the employee enters into a binding settlement via a COT3 agreement.

• expand

  Clifford v Devon County Council [1994] IRLR 628 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • No hours bar on unfair dismissal claims

    Date:

    1 December 1994

    In Clifford v Devon County Council the EAT has ruled that public sector employees are eligible to bring an unfair dismissal complaint, by using EC law, even though they work less than eight hours per week.

• expand

  CMC Group plc v Zhang [2006] All ER (D) 197 (Mar) CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • CMC Group plc v Zhang

    Date:

    8 May 2006

    In CMC Group plc v Zhang [2006] All ER (D) 197 (Mar) CA, the Court of Appeal has held that a clause in a compromise agreement allowing an employer to reclaim the full amount paid if the other party broke any of its terms was not valid.