-
expand
Discount Tobacco & Confectionery Ltd v Williamson [1993] IRLR 327 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 July 1993
In Discount Tobacco & Confectionery Ltd v Williamson [1993] IRLR 327 EAT, the EAT upheld an employment tribunal's decision that in order for a deduction to be lawful, it is not sufficient that the employee gives written consent before the deduction is made. The employee's written agreement must have been given before the conduct or event giving rise to the deduction.
-
expand
Dixon v KB Sheetmetal Ltd [2011] ET/2509566/10
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Dobie v Burns International Security Services (UK) Ltd [1984] IRLR 329 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 21 August 1984
The EAT can overturn industrial tribunal decisions on the ground either that there has been an error of law, or that the decision was perverse. In Dobie v Burns International Security Services (UK) Ltd, the Court of Appeal holds that these are alternative not cumulative reasons for allowing an appeal.
-
expand
Dolphin v Hartlepool Borough Council; Middleton v South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council [2006] All ER (D) 54 (Aug) EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Dominguez v Centre Informatique du Centre Ouest Atlantique [2012] IRLR 321 ECJ
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Donnelly v Kelvin International Services [1992] IRLR 496 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 December 1992
An employee who left his job because of ill health and took lighter work elsewhere before returning to his original employer, did not lose his continuity of employment, holds the EAT in Donnelly v Kelvin International Services. This is because the statutory provisions which preserve continuity during periods of sickness or injury relate to the employee's capability to perform his or her original job.
-
expand
Driver v Driver [2011] ET/3100226/10
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Dudley Bower Building Services Ltd v Lowe and others [2003] IRLR 260 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 7 November 2003
In Dudley Bower Building Services Ltd v Lowe and others, the EAT holds that whether a stable economic entity exists in any given case, for the purposes of a transfer under the TUPE Regulations, is always a question of fact and degree.
-
expand
Duffy v Yeomans & Partners Ltd [1994] IRLR 642 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 December 1994
In Duffy v Yeomans & Partners Ltd [1994] IRLR 642 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the Industrial Tribunal had not erred in holding that the employers' failure to consult the appellant employee before dismissing him on grounds of redundancy did not render the dismissal unfair in circumstances in which, on the facts known to the employers at the time the employee was dismissed, consultation would have served no useful purpose, even though the employers had not made a deliberate decision not to consult.
-
expand
Duncan Web Offset (Maidstone) Ltd v Cooper and others [1995] IRLR 633 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 January 1996
Where the whole of an employer's business is transferred, all of its employees will normally be "assigned" to that business for the purposes of the Transfer of Undertakings Regulations, holds the EAT in Duncan Web Offset (Maidstone) Ltd v Cooper and others.