-
expand
Duncanson v South Ayrshire Council [1999] SLT S19 CS
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Duncombe and others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (No. 2) [2011] IRLR 840 SC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 20 July 2011
The Supreme Court has held that teachers employed by the Government to work in European Schools, which it described as "international enclaves", are entitled to bring unfair dismissal claims in the UK.
-
expand
Duncombe and others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] IRLR 498 SC
(2 reports relating to this case)
The Supreme Court, the highest court in the UK, disagreed with all the lower courts on this issue. The employment tribunal, the Employment Appeal Tribunal, and the Court of Appeal had all held that the use of successive fixed-term contracts was not objectively justified.
-
- Date:
- 8 November 2011
In Duncombe and others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] IRLR 498 SC, the Supreme Court held that the employment of teachers seconded to European Schools on successive fixed-term contracts was objectively justified. However, the teachers could bring unfair dismissal claims in Great Britain in respect of the non-renewal of those contracts, even though they worked wholly abroad.
-
- Date:
- 4 April 2011
The Supreme Court has held that it was objectively justified to employ teachers on successive fixed-term contracts amounting to nine years in total, and that these contracts were not converted into permanent contracts.
-
expand
Dundee City Council v Sharp EATS/0009/11
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Dunk v George Waller and Son [1970] 2 All ER 630 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 31 December 1970
In Dunk v George Waller and Son [1970] 2 All ER 630 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the purpose of an apprenticeship agreement is for the apprentice to receive training in order to obtain better employment, and if the employer terminates the agreement and deprives the apprentice of the training, the apprentice is entitled to earnings under the agreement for the remainder of the apprenticeship and damages for future loss of earnings and prospects.
-
expand
Dunn and another v AAH Ltd [2010] IRLR 709 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 28 July 2010
In Dunn and anor v AAH Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 183 CA, the Court of Appeal held that an employee was guilty of gross misconduct in failing to report a serious financial risk faced by his employer to its parent company. His contract expressly required such a report to be made, and it was not sufficient that he had reported all relevant matters to his line manager.
-
expand
Dunn v Institute of Cemetery and Crematorium Management EAT/0531/10
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 2 June 2012
In Dunn v Institute of Cemetery and Crematorium Management EAT/0531/10, the EAT held that less favourable treatment accorded to an employee on the ground that she was married to a particular person, rather than because of her marital status per se, amounted to unlawful discrimination on the ground of marriage.
-
expand
Dunnachie v Kingston Upon Hull City Council [2004] IRLR 287 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 2 April 2004
In Dunnachie v Kingston upon Hull City Council, the Court of Appeal holds that the comments by Lord Hoffmann in Johnson v Unisys, to the effect that the interpretation of (what is now) s.123 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 given in Norton Tool Co Ltd v Tewson was too narrow in limiting unfair dismissal compensation to economic losses, were obiter and did not bind the Court in the present case.
-
expand
Dunnachie v Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council [2004] IRLR 727 HL
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 24 September 2004
In Dunnachie v Kingston-upon-Hull City Council, the House of Lords holds that Lord Hoffman's comments in Johnson were obiter and, therefore, did not prevent the House of Lords from finding that unfair dismissal compensation should be restricted to economic losses only.
-
expand
Dutton v Hawker Siddeley Aviation Ltd [1978] IRLR 390 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 9 August 1978
S.61 of the Employment Protection Act provides a right for employees who have been given notice of dismissal by reason of redundancy to be allowed reasonable time off during working hours to look for new employment or make training arrangements. In Dutton v Hawker Siddeley Aviation Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal has its first opportunity to consider this section. Several principles emerge from the EAT's decision.