Cases within F

• expand

  Fowler v London Borough of Waltham Forest EAT/0116/06 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Fowler v London Borough of Waltham Forest

    Date:

    16 February 2007

    In Fowler v London Borough of Waltham Forest EAT/0116/06, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has reiterated that the duty to make reasonable adjustments for the disabled does not normally include giving full pay to an individual during sickness absence.

• expand

  Frames Snooker Centre v Boyce [1992] IRLR 472 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Frames Snooker Centre v Boyce

    Date:

    1 October 1992

    In Frames Snooker Centre v Boyce [1992] IRLR 472 EAT, the EAT held that where any one of a group of employees could have committed a particular offence meriting dismissal, the fact that one or more of them was not dismissed does not make the dismissals of the remainder unfair if the employer is able to show that it had "solid and sensible grounds", which do not have to be related to the relevant offence, for differentiating between members of the group.

• expand

  Francisco Hernández Vidal SA v Gómez Pérez and others [1999] IRLR 132 ECJ (1 report relating to this case)

  • Francisco Hernandez Vidal SA v Gomez Perez and others

    Date:

    11 February 1999

    In Francisco HernandezVidal SA v Gomez Perez and others [1999] IRLR 132 ECJ, the European Court of Justice held that, for the purposes of EC Business Transfers Directive 77/187, an organised grouping of wage earners who are specifically and permanently assigned to a common task may, in the absence of other factors of production, amount to an economic entity.

• expand

  Franks v Reuters Ltd and another [2003] IRLR 423 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Employment status: Employee status to be determined from full consideration of evidence

    Date:

    18 July 2003

    In Franks v Reuters Ltd and another, the Court of Appeal holds that in determining an individual's employment status, an employment tribunal should consider, not only any relevant documents, but also all the relevant evidence about the dynamics of the work relationship between the parties, and make clear and comprehensive findings of fact on this evidence.

• expand

  Fraser v HLMAD Ltd [2006] IRLR 687 CA (2 reports relating to this case)

  • Wrongful dismissal: Attempt to recover remainder of wrongful dismissal losses in High Court fails

    Date:

    1 December 2006

    In Fraser v HLMAD Ltd [2006] IRLR 687 CA, the Court of Appeal holds that claimants who bring claims for wrongful dismissal in the employment tribunal, where a statutory limit on damages of £25,000 applies, cannot recover losses in excess of this limit in the High Court.

  • Points of procedure

    Date:

    4 August 2006

    IRS Employment Review looks at decisions on procedural points that have arisen in the EAT and Court of Appeal in the time since its last procedural round-up in December 2005.

• expand

  Fraser v London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames EAT/0888/02 & EAT/0069/03 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Points of procedure

    Date:

    10 June 2005

    A review of recent significant cases on practice and procedure in the employment tribunals, EAT and Court of Appeal.

• expand

  Fraser v Southwest London St George's Mental Health Trust [2012] IRLR 100 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • EAT rules sick employees must give notice of intention to take holiday in order to be paid for it

    Date:

    9 November 2011

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that employees on sick leave must, to be paid for holiday under the Working Time Regulations 1998, give the required statutory notice during the relevant leave year of their intention to take that holiday. 

• expand

  Fraser v Stolt Offshore Ltd [2003] All ER (D) 185 (Apr) EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Fraser v Stolt Offshore Ltd

    Date:

    31 December 2003

    In Fraser v Stolt Offshore Ltd [2003] All ER (D) 185 (Apr) EAT, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that an employer can issue a warning to a fixed-term employee that will be valid for a longer period than the fixed-term contract. The warning will carry over into the next contract and the employee does not have to be notified of this when he accepts the next contract.

• expand

  French v Barclays Bank plc [1998] IRLR 646 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Contracts of employment: Changing terms of relocation loan destroyed mutual trust and confidence

    Date:

    15 January 1999

    In French v Barclays Bank plc, the Court of Appeal holds that a detrimental change in the terms on which a bridging loan was made to an employee who had been requested to relocate was a breach of the implied term of his contract of employment that the employer would not act so as to destroy the trust and confidence existing as between the employer and him.

• expand

  Fuchs and another v Land Hessen [2011] IRLR 1043 ECJ (1 report relating to this case)

  • ECJ considers justification of compulsory retirement at 65 in German context

    Date:

    25 July 2011

    The European Court of Justice has held that German legislation that requires civil servants to retire at 65 can be justified if "appropriate and necessary" means are used to achieve the aim of balancing the employment levels of young and older civil servants to encourage the recruitment and promotion of young people. It also stressed that budgetary considerations cannot by themselves constitute a legitimate aim in relation to a member state's social policy.