Cases within M

• expand

  Midland Bank plc v Madden [2000] IRLR 288 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Misconduct: Range of reasonable responses test is not wrong

    Date:

    1 April 2000

    In Midland Bank plc v Madden, the EAT holds that, while no court short of the Court of Appeal can discard the range or band of reasonable responses test as a determinative test, a tribunal is free to substitute its own views for those of the employer as to the reasonableness of dismissal as a response to the reason shown for it.

• expand

  Midland Bank plc v McCann (1998) IDS 623 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Midland Bank plc v McCann

    Date:

    31 December 1998

    In Midland Bank plc v McCann (1998) IDS 623 EAT, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that with regard to a discretionary bonus the employer had not exercised its discretion in such a way that it could be said to be in breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence.

• expand

  Miles v Linkage Community Trust Ltd [2008] IRLR 602 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Working time: No award of compensation for failure to give rest breaks

    Date:

    14 July 2008

    In Miles v Linkage Community Trust Ltd EAT/0618/07, the EAT held that an employment tribunal was entitled to make no award of compensation where an employer had breached its obligations under the working time rules in respect of daily rest breaks.

• expand

  Miles v Wakefield Metropolitan District Council [1987] IRLR 193 HL (1 report relating to this case)

  • Industrial action: Employer entitled to deduct pay for industrial action

    Date:

    31 March 1987

    Workers who are on strike, or who, by way of industrial action, refuse to carry out their duties, are not entitled to be paid unless the employer accepts such work as is performed during industrial action as complete performance of the worker's duties. So holds the House of Lords in Miles v Wakefield Metropolitan District Council, rejecting Mr Miles' claim for wages in respect of a period of industrial action.

• expand

  Milford Haven Port Authority v Unite the Union [2010] EWCA Civ 400 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Trade union's notice of continuous and discontinuous industrial action is sufficient

    Date:

    30 April 2010

    The Court of Appeal has held that, where a union serves notice on the employer of intended industrial action, one notice is sufficient for both continuous and discontinuous industrial action. 

• expand

  Millam v The Print Factory (London) 1991 Ltd [2007] IRLR 526 CA (2 reports relating to this case)

  • TUPE case law update

    Date:

    27 February 2008

    This article looks at some of the important judgments in the area of the transfer of undertakings over the past year.

  • TUPE: Share transfers

    Date:

    11 July 2007

    In Millam v The Print Factory (London) 1991 Ltd [2007] IRLR 526 CA, the Court of Appeal held that where the operation - as opposed to the ownership of a business - transferred to a new owner, TUPE applied notwithstanding that the business was acquired on a sale of shares.

• expand

  Milovanovic v Hebden Dyeing & Finishing Co Ltd [1995] IT/29691/94 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Worker abused because of Serbian origins

    Date:

    1 June 1995

    An employee of Serbian origin who was subjected to hostile and abusive comments because of his origins, particularly after the start of the Bosnian war, and who found conditions so intolerable that he resigned, was unlawfully discriminated against, rules a Leeds industrial tribunal (Chair: E H J Record) in Milovanovic v Hebden Dyeing & Finishing Co Ltd.

• expand

  Milsom v Leicestershire County Council [1978] IRLR 433 IT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Milsom v Leicestershire County Council

    Date:

    1 October 1978

    In Milsom v Leicestershire County Council [1978] IRLR 433 IT, the Industrial Tribunal held that a pay statement must detail the amount of each variable deduction and the purpose for which it is made, and not merely label an item "miscellaneous deduction".

• expand

  Ministry of Defence v Meredith [1995] IRLR 539 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Sex discrimination: No exemplary damages for breach of Directive

    Date:

    1 September 1995

    In Ministry of Defence v Meredith, the EAT holds that exemplary damages are not available to an ex-servicewoman who was dismissed contrary to the Equal Treatment Directive because she was pregnant.

• expand

  Ministry of Defence v Wallis and another [2011] EWCA Civ 231 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  In Duncombe and others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (No. 2) [2011] IRLR 840 SC, the Supreme Court refused permission for the Ministry of Defence to appeal against this decision.

  • MoD wives working abroad entitled to bring tribunal claims in the UK

    Date:

    15 March 2011

    The Court of Appeal has held that the tribunal was correct to decide that it had jurisdiction to hear claims of unfair dismissal and sex discrimination by two British employees who worked for the Ministry of Defence in Belgium and the Netherlands.