Cases within O

• expand

  O'Brien v Associated Fire Alarms Ltd [1969] 1 All ER 93 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • O'Brien v Associated Fire Alarms Ltd

    Date:

    31 December 1969

    In O'Brien v Associated Fire Alarms Ltd [1969] 1 All ER 93 CA, the Court of Appeal held that if there is no express term relating to the place of work in an employment contract then one will be implied based on the facts.

• expand

  O'Hanlon v Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs [2007] IRLR 404 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Disability discrimination: No obligation to continue to pay full sick pay to disabled employee

    Date:

    11 July 2007

    In O'Hanlon v Commissioners for Inland Revenue & Customs [2007] IRLR 404 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 does not require an employer to continue paying a disabled employee whose entitlement to sick pay has been exhausted by disability-related absence.

• expand

  O'Hanlon v The Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs [2006] IRLR 840 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Disability discrimination: No duty to pay full pay to disabled employee during sickness absence

    Date:

    22 September 2006

    In O'Hanlon v The Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs EAT/0109/06, the Employment Appeal Tribunal holds that the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 does not require an employer to pay disabled employees on sick leave more than it pays non-disabled employees who are off sick.

• expand

  O'Kelly and others v Trusthouse Forte plc [1983] IRLR 369 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Contracts of employment: Casual waiters not employees

    Date:

    23 August 1983

    An Industrial Tribunal's decision as to whether a contract is a contract of employment can only be overturned on appeal if the Tribunal misdirected itself in law or reached a perverse decision on the facts, the majority of the Court of Appeal concludes in the widely publicised case of O'Kelly and others v Trusthouse Forte Plc.

• expand

  O'Laoire v Jackel International Ltd (No.2) [1991] IRLR 170 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Contracts of employment: Wrongful dismissal damages not reduced by UD award

    Date:

    22 March 1991

    The Court of Appeal holds in O'Laoire v Jackel International Ltd that, unless it can be shown that an employee will recover twice for the same loss, damages for wrongful dismissal should not be reduced by the amount of compensation awarded by a tribunal in respect of unfair dismissal.

• expand

  O'Neill v DSG Retail Ltd [2002] All ER (D) 500 (Jul) CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • O'Neill v DSG Retail Ltd

    Date:

    31 December 2002

    In O'Neill v DSG Retail Ltd [2002] All ER (D) 500 (Jul) CA, the Court of Appeal held that as soon as an employer has identified, as a control measure, the need to provide information and training, appropriate steps should be taken to ensure that each and every employee at risk receives that information and training and that appropriate training records are kept.

• expand

  OCS Group UK Limited v Jones and another EAT/0038/09 (1 report relating to this case)

  • TUPE: Activities had substantially changed to prevent service provision change TUPE transfer

    Date:

    14 December 2009

    In OCS Group UK Limited v Jones and another EAT/0038/09, the EAT held that a tribunal had not erred in law in deciding that the activities carried out after a catering contract was taken over by a new contractor were substantially different from the activities carried out by the previous contractor, so there could be no TUPE transfer. The extent to which the activities have changed is a question of fact for the tribunal, and the tribunal in this case had been entitled to reach the conclusion it had.

• expand

  Office Angels Ltd v Rainer-Thomas and O'Connor [1991] IRLR 214 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Contracts of employment: City-wide restriction on competition was too wide

    Date:

    19 July 1991

    A restrictive covenant preventing former employees of an employment agency in the City of London from dealing with and soliciting custom from all 6,000 clients of their former employer was too wide.

• expand

  Optare Group Ltd v Transport and General Workers' Union [2007] IRLR 931 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Redundancy: Volunteers for redundancy did not resign but were dismissed

    Date:

    4 September 2007

    In Optare Group Ltd v Transport and General Workers Union EAT/0143/07 the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that a tribunal was right to hold that voluntary redundancies counted towards the total number of proposed redundancy dismissals at an establishment, which in this case was sufficient to trigger the statutory collective consultation requirements.

• expand

  Orr v Milton Keynes Council [2011] IRLR 317 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Unfair dismissal: employer held not to know mitigating facts known by its employees

    Date:

    8 February 2011

    The Court of Appeal has held that, when considering dismissal of an employee for misconduct, an employer is not taken to have known mitigating facts that are known to the employee's manager but are withheld from the dismissing officer.