Cases within S

• expand

  Sindicato de Médicos de Asistencia Pública (SIMAP) v Conselleria de Sanidad y Consumo de la Generalidad Valenciana [2000] IRLR 845 ECJ (1 report relating to this case)

  • Working time: Doctors' on-call time at work was "working time"

    Date:

    1 November 2000

    In Sindicato de Médicos de Asistencia Pública (Simap) v Conselleria de Sanidad y Consumo de la Generalidad Valenciana, the ECJ rules that all of the time spent on call by teams of doctors providing primary care at health centres was "working time", within the meaning of the EC Working Time Directive, if they were required to be at the health centres.

• expand

  Singh v London Borough of Ealing [1995] IT/28914/89 (1 report relating to this case)

  • "Outstanding candidate" rejected

    Date:

    1 June 1995

    An Asian job applicant who was rejected despite being "the outstanding candidate" for a jobshare vacancy that could have been "tailor-made" for him, was unlawfully discriminated against, holds a London (North) industrial tribunal (Chair: P R K Menon) in Singh v London Borough of Ealing.

• expand

  SITA UK Ltd v Hope EAT/0787/04 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Equal pay: case law update

    Date:

    3 February 2006

    We review recent significant equal pay cases and their implications. Developments of note include the application of the "single source" test to comparators within an employment unit, and a reference to the ECJ on whether use of length of service as a pay system criterion requires specific objective justification.

• expand

  Sivanandan v Enfield London Borough Council [2005] All ER (D) 169 (Jan) CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Points of procedure

    Date:

    10 June 2005

    A review of recent significant cases on practice and procedure in the employment tribunals, EAT and Court of Appeal.

• expand

  Sivanandan v Enfield London Borough Council [2005] All ER (D) 57 (Sep) EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Points of procedure

    Date:

    30 December 2005

    A review of recent significant cases on practice and procedure in the tribunals, EAT, Court of Appeal and Court of Session.

• expand

  Skiggs v South West Trains Ltd [2005] IRLR 459 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Trade unions: Compensation where no loss suffered

    Date:

    13 May 2005

    In Skiggs v South West Trains Ltd, the EAT holds that the employment tribunal was entitled to hold, on the facts, that an investigative meeting concerning a grievance about an employee who had previously been disciplined was not a disciplinary hearing for the purpose of s.10 of the Employment Relations Act 1999.

• expand

  Skills Development Scotland Co Ltd v Buchanan and others EATS/0042/10 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Equal pay: employer not obliged to close pay gap following TUPE transfer

    Date:

    19 July 2011

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that an employer's compliance with the TUPE legislation to preserve existing contractual terms and conditions that results in a disparity in pay can amount to a genuine material factor that may provide a defence to an equal pay claim. 

• expand

  Slade and others v TNT (UK) Ltd EAT/0113/11 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Offer of re-engagement does not need to include incentive previously offered to secure agreement to variation of contract

    Date:

    22 September 2011

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that, where an employer offers an incentive to employees to secure agreement to variation of their contracts, it is reasonable not to offer that benefit as part of an offer of re-engagement following dismissals for failure to agree. 

• expand

  Slaney v Culina Logistick GMBH (trading as Cullina Logistics) [2005] All ER (D) 181 (Nov) EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Points of procedure

    Date:

    30 December 2005

    A review of recent significant cases on practice and procedure in the tribunals, EAT, Court of Appeal and Court of Session.

• expand

  Small and others v Boots Co plc and another [2009] IRLR 328 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Contracts of employment: Tribunal erred in not determining to which aspect of a bonus scheme the employer's discretion attached

    Date:

    27 April 2009

    In Small and others v Boots Co and another [2009] All ER (D) 200 (Jan) EAT, the EAT held that the fact that the employer had stated that a bonus was discretionary did not necessarily mean that it had no contractual effect. The employer's discretion could relate to: whether or not to operate a bonus system at all; whether or not to award a bonus in a given year; or the amount of bonus to be awarded.