-
expand
Smith and others v Trustees of Brooklands College EAT/0128/11
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Smith v AJ Morrisroes & Sons Ltd and other appeals [2005] IRLR 72 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 11 March 2005
In Smith v AJ Morrisroes & Sons Ltd and other appeals, the EAT holds that the guidelines set out by the EAT in Marshalls Clay require that "there must be mutual agreement for genuine payment for holidays, representing a true addition to the contractual rate of pay for time worked."
-
expand
Smith v Avdel Systems Ltd [1994] IRLR 602 ECJ
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 2 March 2007
This article looks at some of the significant judgments in the area of equal pay over the past year and their implications.
-
- Date:
- 1 December 1994
The European Court of Justice has handed down its rulings in six cases on issues relating to sex equality and occupational pension schemes in light of the decision in Barber v Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance Group EOR32A.
-
expand
Smith v Bowater Labels Ltd [1994] IT/3077/94
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 March 1995
A woman who was called a "dumb bastard" by her managing director was not less favourably treated than a man would be treated, and general office banter which was no more offensive to women than to men could not be regarded as sexual harassment, says a Manchester industrial tribunal (Chair: P J Russell) in Smith v Bowater Labels Ltd.
-
expand
Smith v Lehman Brothers Ltd [2005] All ER (D) 177 (Oct) EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Smith v Oxfordshire Learning Disability NHS Trust EAT/0176/09
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Smith v Reliance Secure Task Management Ltd t/a Reliance Monitoring Services [2002] ET/1400993/02
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 31 December 2002
In Smith v Reliance Secure Task Management Ltd t/a Reliance Monitoring Services [2002] ET/1400993/02, an employment tribunal found that the job of tagging offenders did not need to be held by a woman to preserve decency or privacy of female offenders, so there was no genuine occupational qualification defence to a claim of sex discrimination.
-
expand
Smith v Safeway plc [1996] IRLR 456 CA
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 September 1996
In Smith v Safeway plc (16 February 1996) EOR69A, the Court of Appeal holds that an appearance code which applies a standard of what is conventional applies an even-handed approach between men and women, and not one which is sex discriminatory.
-
- Date:
- 1 July 1996
In Smith v Safeway plc, the Court of Appeal holds that an industrial tribunal was entitled to decide that an employer's appearance code which required male employees' hair not to be below collar-length was not discriminatory.
-
expand
Smith v Swithland Motors plc [1994] IT/18926/91
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 December 1994
A car salesman whose health suffered as a direct result of sex discrimination when he was dismissed because he was a man is awarded £15,000 compensation, including £5,000 for injury to feelings, by a Birmingham industrial tribunal (Chair: J K Macmillan) in Smith v Swithland Motors plc.
-
expand
Smith v Trafford Housing Trust [2013] IRLR 86 HC
(1 report relating to this case)