-
expand
Smith v Wessex Water [1993] IT/12645/93
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Société Genérale, London Branch v Geys [2011] IRLR 482 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Sodexho Ltd v Gibbons [2005] IRLR 836 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Software 2000 Ltd v Andrews and others [2007] IRLR 568 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 27 June 2007
In Software 2000 Ltd v Andrews and others EAT/0533/06 the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that where a procedurally unfair dismissal has not been rendered fair by the operation of s.98A(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal must nevertheless consider if there is evidence to suggest that a fair procedure might have led to dismissal, thereby justifying a percentage reduction in compensation under Polkey.
-
expand
Solectron Scotland Ltd v Roper and others [2004] IRLR 4 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 January 2004
In Solectron Scotland Ltd v Roper and others [2004] IRLR 4 EAT, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that the employment tribunal did not err in finding that enhanced redundancy terms over and above what was paid to the applicants on their dismissal, which formed part of their contracts of employment with their previous employer, BT, and to which they were entitled by virtue of the Transfer of Undertakings Regulations 1981, had not been removed by custom or practice.
-
expand
Somjee v United Kingdom [2002] IRLR 886 ECHR
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Soteriou v Ultrachem Ltd [2002] All ER (D) 396 (May) EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 10 January 2003
In Soteriou v Ultrachem, Solvo Ltd and Ultracolour Ltd, the EAT upholds an employment tribunal's decision that an employee's knowing and active participation in the deception of the tax authorities as to his employment status was primarily for his own benefit.
-
expand
Soteriou v Ultrachem Ltd and others [2004] IRLR 870 HC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 November 2004
In Soteriou v Ultrachem Ltd and others [2004] IRLR 870 HC, the High Court held that the EAT had not erred in striking out the applicant's claim for wrongful dismissal on the basis that an employment tribunal had already determined on a claim for unfair dismissal that the applicant's contract of employment was unenforceable due to illegality and that, since the claim for wrongful dismissal involved the same contract, the EAT was bound by that finding.
-
expand
Sothern v Franks Charlesly & Co [1981] IRLR 278 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 June 1981
In Sothern v Franks Charlesly & Co [1981] IRLR 278 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the words "I am resigning" are not ambiguous, so that a reasonable employer would not have interpreted the words when used by the respondent employee as a resignation in the circumstances of the present case.
-
expand
South Ayrshire Council v Morton [2002] IRLR 256 CS
(1 report relating to this case)