Cases within T

• expand

  T Mobile (UK) Ltd v Singleton EAT/0410/10 (1 report relating to this case)

  • No positive duty on employer to correct claimant's ET1 deadline mistake

    Date:

    28 March 2011

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that the employment tribunal was wrong to decide that employers have a positive duty to correct employees or ex-employees in relation to misapprehensions that they have about time limits for bringing claims. 

• expand

  Tanner v DT Kean [1978] IRLR 110 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Tanner v DT Kean

    Date:

    1 March 1978

    In Tanner v DT Kean [1978] IRLR 110 EAT, the EAT held that an Industrial Tribunal was entitled to hold that in using the words "you're finished with me" to the appellant employee, the employer had merely spoken in annoyance and had not dismissed the employee.

• expand

  Tapere v South London and Maudsley NHS Trust [2009] IRLR 972 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • TUPE: Requirement to move to location outside scope of mobility clause in original contract was fundamental breach of contract

    Date:

    11 November 2009

    In Tapere v South London and Maudsley NHS Trust EAT/0410/08, the EAT held that, in requiring a transferred employee to move to a location outside the scope of the mobility clause in her original contract of employment with the transferor, the transferee had acted in fundamental breach of contract. The employee's subsequent resignation therefore amounted to a constructive dismissal. Further, the transferee's attempt to move her place of work amounted to a substantial change in her working conditions to her material detriment. She was, therefore, also entitled to be treated as having been dismissed under reg.4(9) of the TUPE Regulations.

• expand

  Taylor Gordon & Co Ltd v Timmons [2004] IRLR 180 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Points of procedure: part 1

    Date:

    5 March 2004

    A review of recent significant cases on practice and procedure in the employment tribunals and the EAT.

• expand

  Taylor v Alidair Ltd [1978] IRLR 82 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Unfair dismissal: When an employee may not be entitled to a second chance

    Date:

    22 October 1977

    In Taylor v Alidair Ltd, the Appeal Court upholds a finding by the Employment Appeal Tribunal that it was not unfair to dismiss a pilot on the basis of a single error of judgement. And in Retarded Children's Aid Society Ltd v Day, it holds that the Code of Practice notwithstanding, in some cases it may be reasonable to dismiss without giving the employee a second chance, "especially with a man who is determined to go on in his own way".

• expand

  Taylor v Asda Stores Ltd [1994] IT/41315/93 (1 report relating to this case)

  • "Sound race policy" at Asda

    Date:

    1 September 1994

    Asda Stores Ltd was not liable for the racially "offensive and derogatory remark" made by one of its store supervisors to a black contract cleaner, rules a Birmingham industrial tribunal (Chair: B L Owen) in Taylor v Asda Stores Ltd.

• expand

  Taylor v Department of Environment Food & Rural Affairs and others [2003] All ER (D) 80 (Oct) EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Points of procedure: part 1

    Date:

    5 March 2004

    A review of recent significant cases on practice and procedure in the employment tribunals and the EAT.

• expand

  Taylor v OCS Group Ltd [2006] IRLR 613 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Unfair dismissal/disability discrimination: Procedural flaws in disciplinary process not cured only by rehearing

    Date:

    1 December 2006

    In Taylor v OCS Group Ltd [2006] IRLR 613 CA, the Court of Appeal holds that defects in the conduct of a disciplinary hearing are capable of being "cured" in an internal appeal even if it does not amount to a full rehearing of the issue. In addition, a deaf employee not given the opportunity to have an interpreter at his disciplinary hearing was not treated less favourably for a reason related to his disability.

• expand

  Taylor v XLN Telecom Ltd and others [2010] IRLR 499 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Taylor v XLN Telecom Ltd and others

    Date:

    31 March 2010

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that employees, who successfully claim discrimination, are entitled to be compensated for any injury to health or injury to feelings caused by the act complained of, even if they were unaware that the act complained of was discriminatory.

• expand

  Tayside Regional Council v McIntosh [1982] IRLR 272 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Tayside Regional Council v McIntosh

    Date:

    1 July 1982

    In Tayside Regional Council v McIntosh [1982] IRLR 272 EAT, the EAT held that a requirement for "qualifications" need not be expressly stated in a contract of employment, as it may be inferred from the job advertisement or from the nature of the job.