-
expand
W Devis & Sons Ltd v RA Atkins [1977] IRLR 314 HL
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
WA Goold (Pearmak) Ltd v McConnell and another [1995] IRLR 516 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Wade v North Yorkshire Police Authority and another [2011] IRLR 393 FTC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Wain & Ors v Guernsey Ship Management Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 294 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Walker v Sita Information Networking Computing Ltd EAT/0097/12
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery NHS Trust v Bewley [2008] IRLR 588 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Walton v Airtours plc and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada [2003] IRLR 161 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 21 February 2003
In Walton v Airtours plc and another, the Court of Appeal holds that an airline pilot who was unable to continue with his job after becoming ill with chronic fatigue syndrome, but was fit to undertake light part-time work with rehabilitation and a programme of support, remained entitled to benefits under the employer's PHI scheme, notwithstanding that those benefits were payable in the long term only if the employee was unable to "follow any occupation".
-
expand
Waltons & Morse v Dorrington [1997] IRLR 488 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 October 1997
An employer's failure to ban smoking in a poorly ventilated workplace, after it became clear that measures already introduced to resolve the problem of passive smoking were inadequate, was in repudiatory breach of an implied contractual term that it would provide and monitor for its employees, so far as reasonably practicable, a working environment which was reasonably suitable for the performance of their contractual duties, holds the EAT in Waltons & Morse v Dorrington.
-
expand
Wandsworth London Borough Council v D'Silva and another [1998] IRLR 193 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Warby v Wunda Group plc EAT/0434/11
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 17 April 2012
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that, in ascertaining whether or not words that reference a protected characteristic constitute unlawful discrimination, the conduct complained of must be seen in context.