-
expand
Williams v HM Prison Service EAT/1236/00
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 June 2002
In Balamoody v United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting the Court of Appeal holds that an employment tribunal should have constructed a hypothetical comparator against which to consider whether there was evidence to support an inference that the complainant's treatment had been tainted with race discrimination. And the EAT holds in Williams v H M Prison Service that there is no additional duty on a tribunal to construct and consider the position of a hypothetical comparator.
-
expand
Williams v J Walter Thompson Group Ltd [2005] IRLR 376 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 27 May 2005
In Williams v J Walter Thompson Group Ltd, the Court of Appeal holds that an employment tribunal was correct to decide that a blind employee suffered unlawful disability discrimination and constructive unfair dismissal when her employer failed to provide her with the specialist equipment and training necessary for her to carry out the IT work for which she was appointed.
-
expand
Williams v Watsons Luxury Coaches Ltd [1990] IRLR 164 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Williams-Ryan v Marks & Spencer plc [2004] All ER (D) 73 (Sep) EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Willow Oak Developments Ltd t/a Windsor Recruitment v Silverwood and others [2006] IRLR 607 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 20 October 2006
In Willow Oak Developments Ltd t/a Windsor Recruitment v Silverwood and others [2006] IRLR 607 CA, the Court of Appeal holds that a refusal to sign post-employment restrictive covenants can amount to a potentially fair reason for dismissal. However, the tribunal was entitled to find that the way in which the employer had sought to impose the change was procedurally unfair.
-
expand
Wilson (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Clayton [2005] IRLR 108 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Wilson and others v St Helens Borough Council [1996] IRLR 320 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Wilson and others v St Helens Borough Council; British Fuels Ltd v Baxendale and Meade [1998] IRLR 706 HL
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 November 1998
Employees who are dismissed by the transferor of an undertaking, and then re-engaged by the transferee on different but agreed terms, are not entitled to retain the benefit of their previous terms of employment, holds the House of Lords in Wilson and others v St Helens Borough Council and Baxendale and Meade v British Fuels Ltd.
-
expand
Wilson and others v St Helens Borough Council; Meade and Baxendale v British Fuels Ltd [1997] IRLR 505 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 August 1997
In (1) Wilson and others v St Helens Borough Council (2) Meade and another v British Fuels Ltd, the Court of Appeal considers the position under the Transfer of Undertakings Regulations where employees' contracts of employment are terminated on a relevant transfer and they accept employment with the transferee on less favourable terms and conditions.
-
expand
Wilson, Palmer and others v United Kingdom [2002] IRLR 568 ECHR
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 August 2002
In Wilson and others v the United Kingdom, the European Court of Human Rights holds that, whereas the absence under UK domestic law of compulsory collective bargaining did not, in itself, give rise to a violation of article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights, preventing employees from exercising their right to have their trade union protect their interests rendered that right illusory.