Cases within X

• expand

  X v Commission of the European Communities [1995] IRLR 320 ECJ (1 report relating to this case)

  • X v Commission of the European Communities

    Date:

    1 June 1995

    In X v Commission of the European Communities [1995] IRLR 320 ECJ, the European Court of Justice held that, under the European Convention on Human Rights an individual has the right to refuse to undergo a medical examination, and that this right must be respected.

• expand

  X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau and another [2013] IRLR 146 SC (1 report relating to this case)

  • Supreme Court confirms volunteer not covered by disability discrimination law

    Date:

    18 December 2012

    The Supreme Court has upheld the Court of Appeal decision that an unpaid volunteer with no contract was not protected by the (now repealed) Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and that the Equal Treatment Framework Directive (2000/78/EC) does not cover voluntary activity. 

• expand

  X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau and others [2011] EWCA Civ 28 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Employment status: Unpaid volunteer could not claim the protection of the Disability Rights Act or Framework Directive

    Date:

    27 June 2011

    In X v Mid Sussex Citizens’ Advice Bureau and others [2011] EWCA Civ 28 CA, the Court of Appeal held that a volunteer at a Citizens’ Advice Bureau was not an employee for the purposes of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and could not therefore claim disability discrimination when she was asked to stop her voluntary work.

• expand

  X v Stevens [2003] IRLR 411 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Points of procedure: part 2

    Date:

    16 April 2004

    The second of our two-part feature on noteworthy decisions in practice and procedure at the employment tribunals and EAT looks at bias, the right to a fair hearing and a range of other issues.

• expand

  X v Y [2004] IRLR 625 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • X v Y

    Date:

    1 August 2004

    In X v Y [2004] IRLR 625 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the applicant had been fairly dismissed from his job working with youth offenders after he had been cautioned for gross indecency with another man in a public toilet and failed to disclose the fact that he had committed a criminal offence to his employers.