Employment law cases

Unfair dismissal categories

All items: Unfair dismissal

  • Case round-up

    Sinead Jones is an associate, and Phil Dupres and Beckie Howlett are trainee solicitors at Addleshaw Goddard. They round up the latest rulings.

  • Employee unfairly dismissed for imprisonment guilty of contributory conduct

    Date:
    16 May 2012

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has affirmed the employment tribunal's decision that an employee who was unfairly dismissed because the employer believed his prison sentence frustrated his contract of employment was guilty of contributory conduct. 

  • Case round-up

    Georgina Kyriacou and David Malamatenios are partners and Sandra Martins, Colin Makin and Krishna Santra are associates at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.

  • Call-centre worker fairly dismissed for offensive Facebook comments about colleague

    A Northern Ireland industrial tribunal has provided a useful example for employers of circumstances in which it can be fair to dismiss an employee for offensive comments made about a work colleague on Facebook.

  • Case round-up

    Dinu Suntook, Cane Pickersgill and Poppy Fildes are all associates at Addleshaw Goddard. They round up the latest rulings.

  • TUPE transfers: move to new location across London entitled employees to resign

    Date:
    13 March 2012

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that employees who resigned after being faced with a change of place of work to a different part of London because of a TUPE transfer were constructively dismissed. 

  • TUPE transfers: move to franchise model can be ETO reason for dismissal

    Date:
    8 March 2012

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that the dismissal of employees transferred to a company that engaged individuals only under a franchise agreement could amount to an economic, technical or organisational reason (ETO) for dismissal entailing changes to the workforce. 

  • TUPE transferee unlawfully removed sick pay and reduced holiday entitlement one year after transfer

    The employer in this case fell into the trap of assuming that, as long as it waited for a while (one year in this case) after a TUPE transfer, it could detrimentally alter the contractual benefits of employees who had transferred, in a bid to harmonise its workforce's terms and conditions.

  • Case round-up

    David Malamatenios and Georgina Kyriacou are partners, and Krishna Santra, Colin Makin and Sandra Martins are associates at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.

  • Employer's decision to restrict redundancy selection to one made dismissal unfair

    Date:
    28 February 2012

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that the employer's decision to restrict a redundancy selection to one employee when there were other employees doing the same job who could have been put in a redundancy selection pool made her dismissal unfair. 

About this category

Employment law cases: HR and legal information and guidance relating to unfair dismissal.