Employment law cases

All items: Religion or belief discrimination

  • Religion or belief discrimination: Christian employee not permitted to wear cross over uniform did not suffer indirect discrimination

    Date:
    12 January 2009

    In Eweida v British Airways plc EAT/0123/08, the EAT held that a uniform policy that prohibited visible items of jewellery, unless worn in pursuance of a mandatory scriptural requirement, did not indirectly discriminate against a Christian employee who wished to display a cross over her uniform.

  • Religious discrimination: Harassment based on third party's religion

    Date:
    15 December 2008

    In Saini v All Saints Haque Centre and others EAT/0227/08, the EAT held that, where a tribunal found on the facts that the employer had mistreated an employee in order to target his colleague on the grounds of the latter's religion, the tribunal erred in finding that the mistreatment was not unlawful because it was not based on the employee's own religion.

  • Case digest: Religion or belief discrimination

    Date:
    1 April 2008

    Sue Johnstone, editor of Equal Opportunities Review, provides a round-up of some of the remedies that employment tribunals have awarded in religion or belief discrimination cases.

  • Case of the week: Religion or belief discrimination

    This week's case of the week, provided by DLA Piper, covers religion or belief discrimination.

  • Harris v NKL Automotive Ltd and Matrix Consultancy UK Ltd

    Date:
    29 October 2007

    In Harris v NKL Automotive Ltd and Matrix Consultancy UK Ltd EAT 0134/07, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld an employment tribunal's finding that a requirement to have tidy hair did not indirectly discriminate against a Rastafarian who wore his hair in dreadlocks.

  • Azmi v Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council

    Date:
    2 April 2007

    In Azmi v Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council EAT/0009/07, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has dismissed an appeal against an employment tribunal's ruling that an employee who was dismissed for refusing to remove her veil while teaching had not been discriminated against on the grounds of religion or belief.

  • Mohmed v West Coast Trains Ltd

    Date:
    4 September 2006

    In Mohmed v West Coast Trains Ltd EAT/0682/06, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has given the first appellate decision on religious discrimination.

  • Case round up

    Karen Smith and Sophy Robinson of Addleshaw Goddard bring you a comprehensive update on the latest decisions that could affect your organisation, and provide advice on what to do about them.

  • Stedman v UK

    Date:
    31 December 1997

    In Stedman v UK [1997] 23 EHRR 168 ECHR, the European Commission of Human Rights held that the dismissal of a woman for refusing on religious grounds to accept a new contract that would have required her to work Sundays was not an interference with her freedom of religion or other rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.

  • Union discriminated against leftist for political opinions

    Date:
    1 September 1995

    In McKay v Northern Ireland Public Service Alliance (No.2) the Fair Employment Tribunal (President: J Maguire) upholds a complaint of discrimination on grounds of political opinion by an applicant for a seconded trade union post.

About this category

Employment law cases: HR and legal information and guidance relating to religion or belief discrimination.