Employment law cases

All items: Managing employees/workers

  • Disciplinary proceedings: Employer had discretion to delay disciplinary proceedings pending police investigation

    Date:
    11 August 2010

    In Secretary of State for Justice v Mansfield EAT/0539/09, the EAT held that the postponement of disciplinary proceedings pending the outcome of criminal proceedings in respect of the employee's alleged misconduct did not render his eventual dismissal unfair.

  • Unfair dismissal: Employer should have challenged evidence of accuser

    Date:
    11 August 2010

    In Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust v Roldan [2010] EWCA Civ 522 CA, the Court of Appeal held that an employment tribunal was entitled to find a dismissal unfair where the reason for the dismissal included an allegation about a secondary incident that had not been particularised, and where there had been a failure to investigate a key dispute of fact between the accuser and accused.

  • No sex discrimination when administrative error meant woman on maternity leave not informed of internal vacancy

    Date:
    9 August 2010

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that, on the facts of the case, an employer did not commit sex discrimination against an employee on maternity leave when an administrative error meant that she was not informed of a job vacancy. 

  • Mechanic unfairly dismissed on the spot contrary to Acas code

    The employment tribunal in this case increased the amount of compensation awarded to an unfairly dismissed employee because of his employer's failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions of employment or to dismiss him in accordance with the Acas code of practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures.

  • Case round-up

    Ceri Hughes, David Parry, and Carly Mather, associates at Addleshaw Goddard, detail the latest rulings.

  • Employee unfairly dismissed after TUPE transfer

    This case is a good example of a key issue in TUPE claims: whether or not an employee was assigned to the transferred undertaking.

  • Case round-up

    Niki Walker, managing associate at Addleshaw Goddard, details the latest rulings.

  • Whistleblowing: Opinion on discretionary redundancy scheme not protected disclosure

    Date:
    28 June 2010

    In Goode v Marks & Spencer plc EAT/0442/09, the EAT held that an employment tribunal was right to find that an employee had not been dismissed because of having made a protected disclosure. There had been no qualifying or protected disclosure, but merely an opinion expressed about the employer's proposal for changes to a discretionary enhanced redundancy scheme.

  • Whistleblowing: Whistleblower protected where disclosure made in previous employment

    Date:
    14 June 2010

    In BP plc v Elstone and another EAT/0141/09, the EAT held that a worker was entitled to bring a complaint under the whistleblowing provisions of the Employment Rights Act 1996 in respect of a detriment that he allegedly suffered in his current employment because of a protected disclosure that he had made while in previous employment.

  • Case round-up

    Helen Samuel, associate solicitor and Anna Bridges, associate solicitor, at Addleshaw Goddard, detail the latest rulings.

About this category

Employment law cases: HR and legal information and guidance relating to managing employees/workers.