Substance need not be named to fall under COSHH
In Karen Bilton v Fastnet Highlands Ltd, the Scottish Court of Session holds that a fish processor who developed occupational asthma can pursue a claim for compensation against her employer under the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 1988 (COSHH), even though the substance is not specified by COSHH.
To continue reading, register for free access now.
Register now
Already a Brightmine HR and Compliance Centre user?
Log in
