Age discrimination: law firm's mandatory retirement age of 65 for partners was justified
Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes (no 2) [2014] IRLR 748 EAT
age discrimination | compulsory retirement at 65 | justification
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has dismissed an appeal against a finding that a mandatory retirement age of 65 for partners in a law firm was justified.
To continue reading, register for free access now.
Register now
Already a Brightmine HR and Compliance Centre user?
Log in
