Cases within H

• expand

  Heath v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2005] IRLR 270 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Employment tribunal jurisdiction: Judicial immunity for Police Disciplinary Board proceedings

    Date:

    22 October 2004

    In Heath v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, the Court of Appeal holds that proceedings before a Police Disciplinary Board are judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings to which the rule of immunity from suit attaches.

• expand

  Heaven v Whitbread Group Plc EAT/0884/10 (1 report relating to this case)

  • Conditional resignation does not trigger effective date of termination

    Date:

    21 June 2010

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that the date of a conditional resignation cannot constitute the effective date of termination regardless of any agreement between the employer and employee. 

• expand

  Hellyer Brothers Ltd v Atkinson and Dickinson [1994] IRLR 88 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Hellyer Brothers Ltd v Atkinson and Dickinson

    Date:

    1 February 1994

    In Hellyer Brothers Ltd v Atkinson and Dickinson [1994] IRLR 88 CA, the Court of Appeal held that, because of the peculiarities of the crew agreement system, the employees could not claim redundancy payments because of gaps in their continuous employment.

• expand

  Helmet Integrated Systems Ltd v Tunnard and others [2007] IRLR 126 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Helmet Integrated Systems Ltd v Tunnard and others

    Date:

    12 January 2007

    In Helmet Integrated Systems Ltd v Tunnard and others [2007] IRLR 126 CA, the Court of Appeal has held that it was not a breach of contract or any fiduciary duties when an employee failed to inform his employer that he was taking preparatory steps to develop a product that was intended, following his resignation, to be marketed in competition with the employer.

• expand

  Henderson v (1) McMillan Flooring Distributors Ltd and (2) Alatsaris t/a MA Decorators [1994] IT/633/94 (1 report relating to this case)

  • No liability for harassment by contractor

    Date:

    1 June 1995

    A woman who was sexually harassed by an outside contractor did not have a remedy either against her employer or against the contractor, according to a Glasgow industrial tribunal in Henderson v (1) McMillan Flooring Distributors Ltd and (2) Alatsaris t/a MA Decorators because the outside contract did not require the work to be personally executed by the harasser.

• expand

  Henderson v Connect (South Tyneside) Ltd [2010] IRLR 466 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Henderson v Connect (South Tyneside) Ltd

    Date:

    14 October 2009

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that an employer fairly dismissed an employee when a client refused to have him carry out work for it.

• expand

  Hendricks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2003] IRLR 96 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Race and sex discrimination: Proper approach to issue of continuing acts of discrimination

    Date:

    21 March 2003

    In Hendricks v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, the Court of Appeal holds that an employment tribunal did not err in law in deciding that it had jurisdiction to hear a police officer's race and sex discrimination complaints, notwithstanding that none of the numerous alleged incidents of discriminatory treatment complained of occurred in the three-month period preceding the presentation of her originating application.

• expand

  Henry and others v London General Transport Services Ltd [2001] IRLR 132 EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Contracts of employment: Collectively agreed terms may have been incorporated by custom and practice

    Date:

    15 March 2001

    An employment tribunal erred in ruling that employees who protested to their employer, by way of petition, against new terms and conditions of employment collectively agreed between the employer and the recognised trade union had not accepted those terms, holds the EAT in London General Transport Services Ltd v Henry and others.

• expand

  Henry and others v London General Transport Services Ltd [2002] IRLR 472 CA (1 report relating to this case)

  • Contracts of employment: Clear evidence of custom and practice covers all contractual terms

    Date:

    30 December 2002

    In Henry and others v London General Transport Services Ltd, the Court of Appeal holds that, whereas clear evidence is required that a custom and practice has been incorporated into individual contracts of employment by virtue of the collective bargaining between an employer and the recognised trade union, such a custom and practice, once established, can be expected to cover all contractual terms.

• expand

  Hepworth Heating Ltd v Akers and others [2003] All ER (D) 33 (Jul) EAT (1 report relating to this case)

  • Hepworth Heating Ltd v Akers and others

    Date:

    31 December 2003

    In Hepworth Heating Ltd v Akers and others [2003] All ER (D) 33 (Jul) EAT, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that the employer had not used an unlawful act to compel acceptance of a cashless pay system. The employees might have been unhappy with the new terms, but there had been no duress.