Indirect discrimination: claimants required to show the "reason why" they are disadvantaged
Essop and others v Home Office (UK Border Agency) [2015] IRLR 724 CA
indirect discrimination | adverse impact | particular disadvantage
The Court of Appeal has held that it is necessary in indirect discrimination claims for the claimant to show why the provision, criterion or practice (PCP) has disadvantaged the group and the individual claimant.
To continue reading, register for free access now.
Register now
Already a Brightmine HR and Compliance Centre user?
Log in
