Indirect discrimination: no need for claimants to explain why they are disadvantaged
Essop and others v Home Office (UK Border Agency) [2017] IRLR 558 SC
indirect discrimination | adverse impact | particular disadvantage
The Supreme Court has held that claimants in indirect discrimination claims are not required to explain why the provision, criterion or practice (PCP) puts, or would put, the affected group at a particular disadvantage.
To continue reading, register for free access now.
Register now
Already a Brightmine HR and Compliance Centre user?
Log in
