Whistleblowing victimisation: Court of Appeal sets out correct causation test
-
expand disabled
Fecitt and others and Public Concern at Work v NHS Manchester [2012] IRLR 64 CA (0 other reports)
whistleblowing | victimisation | test for causation | vicarious liability
The Court of Appeal has held that the test where a worker is alleging a detriment for whistleblowing is to decide whether or not the protected disclosure has materially influenced (in the sense of being more than a trivial influence) the employer's treatment of the individual.