-
expand
A Dugdale and others v Kraft Foods Ltd [1976] IRLR 368 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 24 November 1976
In the Capper Pass v Lawton, the EAT hold that in determining whether a woman and a man are employed on broadly similar work, Industrial Tribunals should disregard "trivial differences or differences not likely in the real world to be reflected in terms and conditions of employment". And in Dugdale and others v Kraft Foods Ltd, the EAT hold that the time that the work is performed should also be disregarded when considering whether jobs constitute like work within the s.1(4) definition.
-
expand
A v B EAT/0025/13
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 June 2013
Amanda Steadman is a professional support lawyer, and Joe Beeston, Laura Garner, Helen Samuel and Dinu Suntook are associates at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.
-
expand
A v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and another [2004] IRLR 573 HL
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
A v R [2003] All ER (D) 243 (Nov) EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
AA Solicitors Ltd (t/a AA Solicitors) and another v Majid EAT/0217/15
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 27 October 2016
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld an employment tribunal decision to award £14,000 for injury to feelings after a young lawyer was subjected to sexual harassment in the workplace and forced out of her job. Zoe Lomax, employment associate at DLA Piper, examines the decision including the level of compensation dictated by the Vento bands.
-
expand
AB v A Chief Constable [2014] EWHC 1965 HC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 September 2014
Gerri Hurst, Sinead Keenan, Carly Mather, Joelle Parkinson and Mark Rose are associates at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.
-
expand
Abadeh v British Telecommunications plc [2001] IRLR 23 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 December 2000
In Abadeh v British Telecommunications plc the EAT holds that, for the purposes of the Disability Discrimination Act, the question of what constitutes a "normal day-to-day activity" must be addressed without regard to whether or not the activity is normal to the particular applicant.
-
expand
Abbey National plc and another v Chagger [2009] IRLR 86 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 2 December 2008
In Chagger v Abbey National plc and another EAT/0606/07, the EAT held that a claim of discrimination on grounds of skin colour inevitably involves a complaint of discrimination on the grounds of race or ethnic origin, thus engaging s.54A of the Race Relations Act 1976. In addition, allowing an appeal against an award of around £2.8 million compensation, the EAT held that the tribunal should have considered a Polkey-type question in relation to loss of earnings, and that recoverable loss should be limited to that flowing from loss of employment with the discriminator.
-
expand
Abbey National plc v Formoso [1999] IRLR 222 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
ABC News Intercontinental Inc v Gizbert EAT/0160/06
(1 report relating to this case)