-
expand
Austin v A1M Retro Classics Ltd ET/2500934/20
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Austin v Samuel Grant (North East) Ltd ET/2503956/11
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 2 August 2012
In this tribunal decision, an employee who suffered workplace abuse successfully claimed sexual orientation and religion or belief harassment, despite being heterosexual and not declaring his religious beliefs.
-
expand
Austin v West Sussex County Council ET/3102059/2012
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 2 October 2013
Assumptions that an individual accused of sexual harassment must be guilty can be costly, as this council found out after a tribunal awarded the claimant £169,000 for sex discrimination and constructive dismissal.
-
expand
Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher and others [2010] IRLR 70 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 10 February 2010
In Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher and others [2010] IRLR 70 CA, the Court of Appeal held that a group of car valeters were employees, despite the fact that their written contracts with the valeting company stated that they were independent contractors, and contained clauses allowing "substitution of labour" and the "right to refuse work".
-
expand
Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher and others [2011] IRLR 820 SC
(1 report relating to this case)
This decision from the Supreme Court, the highest court in the UK, is the leading decision on when tribunals and courts may look outside the terms of employment to determine the true nature of the agreement, where reality does not match the contractual position. It replaces previous narrower case law that suggested that a finding that a contract was in part a sham required that both parties intended it to “paint a false picture as to the true nature of their respective obligations”.
-
- Date:
- 4 August 2011
The Supreme Court has affirmed that, where a party asserts that a written term does not reflect the reality of the agreement, tribunals and courts may look outside the terms to determine the true nature of the agreement.
-
expand
Automotive and Financial Group Ltd v Bark [1994] EAT/398/94
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 March 1995
In Automotive and Financial Group Ltd v Bark the EAT has held that a compensation award of £2,000 for injury to feelings to a trainee salesperson, who was dismissed after she was sexually harassed, fell within the bracket of permissible awards.
-
expand
Awan v ICTS UK Ltd [2019] IRLR 212 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Ayodele v Citylink Ltd and another [2018] IRLR 114 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Ayub and others v Nottinghamshire County Council [1994] IT/21210/93
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Aziz v First Division Association (FDA) [2010] EWCA Civ 304 CA
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 May 2010
Richard Ryan, associate, Helen Ward, associate, and Tori O'Neil, trainee solicitor, Addleshaw Goddard, detail the latest rulings.
-
- Date:
- 1 April 2010
The Court of Appeal has held that, where a claimant is alleging that separate incidents form one continuous act for the purposes of extending the normal time limit within which to bring a claim for racial discrimination, a relevant but not conclusive factor is whether the same individuals or different individuals were involved in the separate incidents.