Victimisation: There may be a valid distinction between a protected act and "genuinely separable" features of consequences of that act
-
expand disabled
Martin v Devonshires Solicitors EAT/0086/10 (0 other reports)
In Martin v Devonshires Solicitors EAT/0086/10, the EAT held that, where an employer dismisses an employee in response to his or her protected act, the employer may not have unlawfully victimised the employee where the reason for the dismissal was some feature of the protected act that can be treated as separable.
To continue reading, register for free access now.
Register now
Already a Brightmine HR and Compliance Centre user?
Log in
