Whistleblowing: Opinion on discretionary redundancy scheme not protected disclosure
-
expand disabled
Goode v Marks & Spencer plc EAT/0442/09 (0 other reports)
In Goode v Marks & Spencer plc EAT/0442/09, the EAT held that an employment tribunal was right to find that an employee had not been dismissed because of having made a protected disclosure. There had been no qualifying or protected disclosure, but merely an opinion expressed about the employer's proposal for changes to a discretionary enhanced redundancy scheme.
To continue reading, register for free access now.
Register now
Already a Brightmine HR and Compliance Centre user?
Log in
