SUBJECT
|
PROGRESS AND COMMENTS
|
Accidents
|
see also HSC/E
|
2000/01 statistics
|
The number of workers killed in Britain in the year to April 2001 was 34%
higher than in the previous year. The rise, from 220 to 295 deaths,
represented an increase in the fatal injury rate from 0.8 to 1.1 per 100,000
workers. Over the same period, the provisional numbers of reported non-fatal
major injuries to workers fell by 4.7%, from 29,315 to 27,935 employees, with
the over-three-day injury total falling by 1.7%. Safety statistics
bulletin 2000/01, C65, free;1 Health and safety
statistics 2000/01, ISBN 0 7176 2110 3, £17.501 or www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/hss0001.pdf.
|
Investigation
|
Consultation closed on 3 September 2001 on HSC
proposals to place a duty on all organisations to investigate and record
RIDDOR-reportable injuries, ill health and near misses (Learning lessons from the investigation of
"accidents"). Proposals for a new duty to investigate accidents,
dangerous occurrences and diseases, free.1 The proposals
follow a 1999 HSE discussion document, to which the HSE received 684
responses, with a majority broadly in favour of a new duty. The HSE is
analysing the responses to the condoc, and the HSC will consider the findings
later this summer with a view to advising ministers on the way forward. The
HSE also published the research it quoted in its consultation document: Accident
investigation - the drivers, methods and outcomes, CRR 344/2001, £25.1
|
Agriculture
|
see also Pesticides
|
Enforcement
|
In January 2002, the HSE resumed its programme of agriculture safety
awareness days; the foot and mouth outbreak postponed the programme for most
of 2001. Details:2
|
Fatalities
|
Provisional figures showed 53 people were killed in agricultural incidents in the year to April 2001
- nine more than the previous year.1
|
E.coli
|
The HSE warned farmers about the exposure of visitors to Escherichia coli
O157 (E.coli O157). Advice: Avoiding ill health at open farms (rev),
Agriculture Information Sheet no.23, free.1
Related task force report: www.foodstandards.gov.uk.
|
Risk assessment
|
The Government gave the HSE £90,000 from the Invest to
Save Budget (ISB) scheme to develop an electronic means for farmers to
carry out their own risk assessments.2
|
Published
|
Back on the farm, (manual
handling), ISBN 0 7176 1866 8, £25;1 Fatal traction, HSE, National Agricultural Centre,
Stoneleigh, Warwickshire CV8 2LZ, or fax: 02476 696542; Symptom-reporting following occupational exposure to
organophosphate pesticides in sheep dip, CRR 371/2001, £10;1 Whole-body vibration:
initial evaluation of emissions originating from modern agricultural
tractors, CRR 413/2002, ISBN 0 7176 2276 2, £20;1 Risk perception leading
to risk taking behaviour amongst farmers in England and Wales, CRR
404/2002, ISBN 0 7176 2251 7, £20.1
|
Asbestos |
|
Proposed Directive
|
On 7 March 2002 at the social affairs Council, EU
ministers "took note" of progress on a proposed Directive to tighten the
controls on asbestos at work. Although UK law already covers much of the
proposal, the Directive would remove "reasonable practicability" from the
Regulations and reduce the exposure limit for chrysotile (EU proposes cutting "reasonably
practicable" from asbestos regs). The EU Committee of Permanent
Representatives is currently working on the proposal, following the
opinion of the European Parliament which, along with the European Economic
and Social Committee, voted to lower the proposed chrysotile limit still
further (Committees urge MEPs to toughen
asbestos Directive). The European Commission issued the proposal on 20
July 2001. The HSE broadly supports the proposal in its unamended form. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament
and of the Council amending Council Directive 83/477/EEC on the protection
of workers from risks related to exposure to asbestos at work,
COM(2001)417 final.13
|
Management
|
Consultation closed on 19 February 2002 on a second
HSC consultation on its proposal for a new duty to manage the risk from
asbestos in premises. The revisions reflected responses to the June 2000
consultation document (CD 1591). The main
change is a widened definition of "duty holder". The proposals would also
implement the asbestos aspects of the European Union's chemical agents
Directive (Chemicals: HSC takes CLAW to
COSSH, see Chemicals etc (Chemical
agents Directive) below). The HSE is currently refining the
Regulations and Approved Code of Practice (ACoP) to take account of
comments made during consultation, particularly to make clear who will be
the duty holder. The amended and consolidated Regulations will be made by
mid-September 2002 and the new ACoP published at the same time. The new
duty to manage asbestos will have an 18-month lead-in time, coming into
force in March 2004. Revised proposals for
amendments to the Control of Asbestos at Work Regulations and a new
supporting ACoP, CD 176, free.1. The HSE responded to media reports that white
asbestos (chrysotile) is harmless by insisting that it is a major health
hazard. As such, chrysotile will be included in the Regulations. HSE position statement on the risks from white
asbestos, free.2
|
ACoPs
|
Consultation closed on 22 May 2002 on HSC proposals to
revise the two asbestos Approved Codes of Practice (ACoPs L27 and L28).
The HSE intends to publish the revised ACoPs by October 2002. The proposed
revisions reflect changes to the Control of Asbestos at Work Regulations
(CAW) and partial implementation of the chemical agents Directive (see Chemicals etc (Chemical agents Directive)
below). Proposals for amendments to the existing
two ACoPs which support the CAW Regulations, CD 181, free.1
|
Compensation
|
On 16 May 2002, the House of Lords overturned a Court
of Appeal ruling that would have made it all but impossible for workers
suffering from mesothelioma to recover compensation if they were exposed
to asbestos by more than one employer (see House of Lords averts major
asbestos "injustice"). The Government extended benefit under the
Pneumoconiosis (Workers' Compensation) Act 1979 to those affected by the
ruling as an interim measure, although payments would be limited. , [2001] EWCA 1881, Court of Appeal, Civil Division,
B3/01/038211, 11 December 2001 (Mesothelioma
ruling reveals a "major injustice").
|
Published
|
Surveying, sampling and
assessment of asbestos-containing materials, MDHS 100, ISBN 0 7176
2076 X, £18 (EU proposes cutting "reasonably
practicable" from asbestos regs).1
|
Call centres |
|
Guidance
|
The HSE revised its advice on call centres to
inspectors and employers, following an in-depth study of working
practices. The main additions and changes to the 1999 guidance cover
verbal abuse, stress, lengths and frequencies of breaks and possible
hearing hazards. The HSE will publish an analysis of the study in summer
2002. Advice regarding call centre working
practices, Local authority circular 94/1 (rev), HSE local authority
unit4, or www.hse.gov.uk/lau (Safe and healthy call
centres).
|
Chemicals etc |
see also Asbestos, Major hazards |
Chemical agents Directive
|
Consultation closed on 21 January 2002 on HSC
proposals to replace the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health
Regulations (COSHH) and Control of Lead at Work Regulations (Chemicals: HSC takes CLAW to
COSSH). The proposals would implement the health requirements of the
1998 chemical agents Directive that are not already covered in UK
legislation. The HSE is still considering the responses to consultation
and deciding what changes might be made to the draft Regulations and
ACoPs. The HSE will report the outcome of the consultation, together with
a revised implementation package, to the HSC on 16 July 2002. If the HSC
approves the draft Regulations, and subject to Ministerial approval, the
HSE will aim to lay the new COSHH and CLAW Regulations before parliament
by 31 August 2002, coming into force 21 days later. The condoc proposed
prescriptive duties on employers for carrying out assessments, preventing
or controlling exposure, monitoring exposure, placing employees under
health surveillance and providing information, instruction and training.
The consultative document contains revised versions of Approved Codes of
Practice (ACoP) on COSHH (general), carcinogens, vinyl chloride,
biological agents and lead. Proposals for
implementing the chemical agents Directive (98/24/EC) with new COSHH
Regulations and CLAW Regulations, CD 173, free.1
The
implementation of the safety aspects of the Directive was covered in a
February 2002 consultative document (CD 180)1. This proposed new Dangerous Substances and
Explosive Atmospheres Regulations (DSEA), which would require employers to
carry out a risk assessment and eliminate or reduce the risk in relevant
circumstances. The Regulations are due to come into force in summer 2002
and would also implement the explosive atmospheres Directive (ATEX 137).
The HSC issued two further consultative documents linked to the proposed
DSEA Regulations,1 on flammable and
explosive substances, and the first phase of the modernisation of petrol
legislation. Consultation closed on all three documents on 20 May 2002.
See Asbestos above for implementation of the
asbestos aspects of the Directive (CD 159).
|
OEL reforms
|
The HSC published a discussion document suggesting
major changes to the process of setting occupational exposure limits
(OELs) and for linking them to good practice (Rethinking the limits). Comments should reach Sarah Wassell by
31 July 2002 at HSE, Health Directorate,4
or email: CRAU@hse.gsi.gov.uk. The
HSC intends issuing a consultative document in 2003 and amending the COSHH
regime in 2004. Occupational Exposure Limits (OEL)
framework, DDE 19, free.1
Consultation
will close on 7 June 2002 on 10 proposed
changes to the lists of occupational exposure limits. The proposals are
due to come into force on the publication of EH40:
Occupational exposure limits early in 2003. Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations
1999: proposals for maximum exposure limits and occupational exposure
standards, CD 182, free.1
|
COSHH essentials
|
The HSE launched a free,
internet-based version of COSHH essentials on
30 April 2002 (Rethinking the limits). First published as a priced, paper-based
package in 1999 for small and medium-sized enterprises, the electronic
version was developed for the HSE by Butterworths Tolley, publishers of
HSB. Website: www.coshh-essentials.org.uk.
|
IOELV Directives
|
The HSC implemented the first Indicative Occupational
Exposure Limit Value (IOELV) Directive on 31 December 2001. The Directive
requires member states to have national limits in place by this date.
Maximum Exposure Limits (MELs) and Occupational Exposure Standards (OESs)
for the Directive's 63 substances are included in tables 1 and 2 of EH40/2002: Occupational exposure limits. Before
new Occupational Exposure Limits (OELs) are adopted in Britain, the HSC
consults interested parties on the HSE's interpretation of the scientific
and technical information on which the recommendations for limits by the
Advisory Committee on Toxic Substances (ACTS) to the HSC are based. The
first IOELV Directive was consulted on via four consultative documents: CD
156/00; CD 157/00; CD 166/01; and CD 168/01.1
A second IOELV
Directive is currently in the process of being agreed. The original text
covered a further 26 substances, but adoption is on hold, pending the
inclusion of additional substances into the Directive. The Luxembourg
Advisory Committee (a tripartite advisory committee of the European Union
(EU) Commission on hygiene, health and safety issues, responsible for
discussing and agreeing opinions on any health and safety policy proposals
that the Commission puts forward) last discussed the proposals in May
2001. There are no details available yet as to when member states will
vote on the proposals. Details: www.hse.gov.uk/hthdir/2ioelv.htm.
|
Lead
|
Consultation closed on 21 January 2002 on HSC
proposals to replace the Control of Lead at Work Regulations (see Chemical agents Directive above and Chemicals: HSC takes CLAW to
COSSH). There was "an appreciable fall" in 2000/01 in the number of
workers under blood-lead level surveillance. Exposure to lead at work: blood lead levels of workers
exposed to lead at work in Great Britain, 1996/97 to 2000/01, www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/2002/leadkf.pdf.
|
Dangerous substances
|
Consultation closed on 11 December 2001 on the HSC's
proposed extensive changes to the classification and labelling of
dangerous chemicals to ensure people at work and home are properly
informed about the dangers of chemicals to their health and the
environment. Proposals for new amending Regulations
about the classification, packaging and labelling of chemicals: CHIP 3,
CD 171, free.1
The HSC also
published proposals to implement the 28th adaptation to technical progress
(ATP) of the dangerous substances Directive. The Directive must be
implemented by 30 July 2002. Proposals for new
amending Regulations for the Notification of New Substances: NONS
2001, CD 178, free.1
The 28th ATP
was published in the Official Journal of the European Communities
(L225/21.8.01).13 The HSE plans to
implement the adaptation through CHIP 3 when it implements the dangerous
preparations Directive (1994/45/EC) and by amending the NONS Regulations
to implement the reduced test package for intermediates. Both sets of
Regulations are being finalised, with CHIP 3 due to be published in June
2002 and NONS in July 2002.
|
Asthma
|
The HSC announced on 10 October 2001 that it will
produce an ACoP on the control of occupational asthma. The ACoP will
appear in summer or autumn 2002 as an annex to the Control of Substances
Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002. The HSC received 106 responses to
its November 2000 consultation document: Proposals
for reducing the incidence of occupational asthma, including an ACoP:
Control of substances that cause occupational asthma, CD 164, free1 or: www.hse.gov.uk/condocs/cd164.htm/closed.
Consultation closed on 16 February 2001. The HSC set a 30% reduction
target in the incidence of asthma caused by substances at work by
2010.2
Consultation
closed on 18 May 2001 on HSC proposals for the introduction of a maximum
exposure limit (MEL) for piperazine and piperazine dihydrochloride, and
the withdrawal of the occupational exposure standard for piperazine
dihydrochloride. Both chemicals are considered to have asthmagenic
properties. Details: www.hse.gov.uk/condocs/cd168.pdf. The HSE is
currently analysing the responses.
|
Published
|
Cancer among current and
former workers at National Semiconductor (UK) Ltd, Greenock: results of an
investigation by the HSE, ISBN 0 7176 2144 8 £7.50,1 or www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/nsukrept.pdf (Cancer: Semiconductor work linked
to cancer); Controlling exposure to
disinfectants used in the food and drink industries, Food information
sheet no.29, free;1 The management, design and operation of
microbiological containment laboratories, ISBN 0 7176 20344, £9.501 (a complementary training video is also
available6); Reactpool: a new model for accidental releases of
water reactive chemicals, CRR 331/2001, ISBN 0 7176 1995 8, £10;1 A series of experiments
to study the spreading of liquid pools with different bund
arrangements, CRR 405/2002, ISBN 0 7176 2255 X, £20;1 Surface cleaning:
solvent update including the reclassification of trichloroethylene,
Engineering Information Sheet no.34;1 A model for jet dispersion in a congested
environment, CRR 396/2001, ISBN 0 7176 2234 7, £20;1 Flashing liquid jets
and two-phase dispersion - a review, CRR 403/2001, ISBN 0 7176 2250 9,
£15;1 Calculation of
input data importances for toxic release risk assessments: Gastar and
Crunch, CRR 338/2001, ISBN 0 7176 2013 1 £20;1 CFD simulation and
detailed chemical modelling of alkane autoignition near a heated metal
surface, CRR 352/2001, ISBN 0 7176 2051 4 £20;1 and The validity and
interpretation of neurobehavioural data obtained in studies to investigate
the neurotoxic effects of occupational exposure to mixtures of organic
solvents, CRR 355/2001, ISBN 0 7176 2060 3, £20.1
|
Compensation |
see also Asbestos, Stress |
Unions
|
The TUC reported that 41,252 personal injury claims
taken by unions reached settlement in 2001, totalling £321 million
compensation. Focus on services for union
victims, TUC, tel: 020 7467 1294, £10.11
|
Computers |
|
Software
|
The HSE proposed issuing guidance on good practice in
the use of software packages in safety-related systems. To facilitate the
process, the HSE asked for comments on two studies by 27 July 2001: Methods for assessing the safety integrity of
safety-related software of uncertain pedigree (SOUP), CRR 337/2001,
ISBN 0 7176 2011 5, £101 and Justifying the use of software of uncertain pedigree
(SOUP) in safety-related applications, CRR336/2001, ISBN 0 7176 2010
7, £201 or www.hse.gov.uk/research/frameset/crr/index.htm.
The HSE says it received a "disappointingly small number of comments" and
is still open to responses. The proposed guidance remains in draft form,
and will be developed for compatibility with guidance on other software
topics. As soon as the drafts are ready for consultation, the normal
public consultation process will be followed.
|
Internet
|
Research carried out for the HSE found little evidence
that adequate consideration has been given to the security and stability
of the technology that allows connection of manufacturing and control
systems to the internet. Safety implications of
industrial uses of internet technology, CRR 408/2002, ISBN 0 7176 2268
1, £101 or www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_pdf/2002/crr02408.pdf.
|
Published
|
Developing advisory software
to comply with IEC-61508, CRR 419/2002, ISBN 0 7176 2304 1, £10,1 or free at: www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_pdf/2002/crr02419.pdf.
|
Construction |
|
Enforcement
|
The HSE launched a new national construction division
on 8 April 2002 that, for the first time, allows the chief inspector to
deploy directly the HSE's construction resource. The reorganisation
accompanies some changes in enforcement "emphasis", including targeting
more interventions at clients and designers.2
|
Action plans
|
On 18 October 2001, the HSC hosted a major
construction conference reviewing progress in delivering the industry's 10
action plans agreed at the "last chance" February 2001 construction safety
summit called by Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott. In February 2002,
the HSE marked the first anniversary of the summit by reporting to
Government ministers on the industry's progress towards meeting the action
plans. The HSE notes that the industry has made progress towards achieving
a fully qualified workforce, a single-card registration scheme with mutual
recognition of other existing schemes, and adequate workforce involvement,
but that it is too early to judge whether the effort is producing lasting
results. Progress with implementation of the
Construction Summit action plans, www.hse.gov.uk or www.wwt.uk.com. The
report will feed into a forthcoming discussion document (see below).2
|
CDM Regulations
|
On 1 February 2002, a revised ACoP and guidance on the
Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 1994 (CDM) came into
force. The HSC received 360 responses to its 2000 consultation document
(CD 161, free, www.hse.gov.uk/condocs/cd161.htp. The main changes
are: a greater emphasis on the management of health and safety throughout
the life of a project; clarification of the duties of clients and
designers; and inclusion of the Management of Health and Safety at Work
Regulations 1999. Managing health and safety in
construction, ISBN 0 7176 2139 1, £9.50.1
The HSE plans
to publish a discussion document in autumn 2002 to stimulate discussion
about what needs to change to achieve a "stepchange" in construction
health and safety and how, working together with the industry, it can
achieve those changes. The document will focus on cultural and business
levers, rather than legislative changes, although it will invite evidence
and comments about what works well and what needs to be changed in the CDM
and Construction (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1996 (CHSW). In
2003, the HSC plans to publish a consultative document suggesting a way
forward for CDM and CHSW in the light of those comments. The HSE aims to
complete that review so that any changes can be implemented at the same
time as changes to CHSW that follow from the temporary work at height
Directive, which has to be implemented by July 2004.
|
Directive
|
On 27 June 2001, the European Council adopted a
Directive to reduce the risks of falls from height. Implementation is
required three years after adoption and the HSE reports much informal
activity, including discussions with industry representatives on how it
might implement the Directive. The HSE hopes to submit a paper to the HSC
in June 2002 and issue a consultative document later this year. Ministers
adopted a common position on the Directive on 23 March 2001. The European
Parliament had given a successful first reading to the proposal on 21
September 2000 and a second reading on 14 June 2001, and Ministers had
reached political agreement on 17 October 2000. The European Commission
published a revised proposal in February 2001 (OJ C62/27.2.01)13. Directive 2001/45/EC
of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 amending
Council Directive 89/655/EEC concerning the minimum health and safety
requirements for the use of work equipment by workers at work (second
individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive
89/391/EEC),OJ L195/19.7.200113.
|
Small firms
|
Research carried out for the HSE confirmed that the
majority of construction deaths occur on smaller sites, although there is
no specific association with time of day, age or geographic region. The
project's second phase will look at the influences on incidents in detail.
Improving health and safety in construction: Phase
1: Data collection, review and structuring, ISBN 0 7176 2140 5,
£35.1
The HSE
targeted small employers and the self-employed in a major advertising
campaign on construction safety.2 Related
advice: The absolutely essential health and safety
toolkit for the smaller construction contractor, INDG 344, tel: 08457
181819, free; packs of five, ISBN 0 7176 2103 0, £5.1
|
Working well together
|
The HSE's Working Well Together campaign bus continues
to tour the UK. The campaign was launched in 1999 and aims to improve
construction companies' health and safety commitment, competence,
communication and cooperation. The HSE plans a further tour in summer 2002
to Scotland, north England and north Wales. Since 1999, more than 12,000
workers have signed up to the campaign. The tour provides workers with
information packs on how to stay healthy and safe at work, and test their
safety awareness with competitions. Details: wwt.uk.com, tel: 0845
2727500.
|
Blitz
|
HSE inspectors served prohibition notices on half of
the 223 London construction sites they visited in a spring blitz at the
end of April. The blitz was the first in a year-long national initiative
planned by HSE's new Construction Division.
|
Tunnelling
|
The HSE issued new approved procedures on
decompression for tunnelling workers operating in raised atmospheric
pressure. Details: Donald Lamont, HSE, tel: 0151 951 4818, email: donald.lamont@hse.gsi.gov.uk.
|
Published
|
Health and safety in
construction, HSG 150, ISBN 0 7176 2106 5, £9.95;1 Identification and
management of risk in undergraduate construction courses, CRR
392/2001, ISBN 07176 2148 0, £15;1 Inspection of energy absorbing lanyards made from
webbing or rope, HSE inspectors' operational circular 282/29, free,
tel: 0161 952 8404, and Issues surrounding the
failure of an energy absorbing lanyard, specialist inspector report
no.59, £201 or free at www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/sir59.pdf.
|
Cost-benefit analysis |
|
Ready reckoner
|
On 23 April 2002, the HSC launched its "ready
reckoner" tool for helping small and medium-sized enterprises calculate
their own costs of work-related ill health and injuries (see The "ready
reckoner"). Website: www.hse.gov.uk/costs; Reduce risks - cut costs: the real costs of accidents
and ill health at work, leaflet, free.1
|
NHS costs
|
Two-and-a-half years after recommending that the NHS
should be entitled to recoup from negligent employers its expenditure on
treating victims of work-related injuries, the Law Commission has finally
received a Government response. The Lord Chancellor's Department has now
decided to reconsult on the report, along with other reports on damages
published around the same time. The department is currently consulting
informally with other government departments. Damages for personal injury: medical, nursing and
other expenses; collateral benefits, no.262 Law Commission, November
1999, www.open.gov.uk/lawcomm/.
|
Electricity |
see also HSC/E, Mines |
Enron explosion
|
The HSE has submitted to the Coroner the report of its
investigation into an electrical transformer
explosion on 8 August 2001 at the Teesside Power Station operated by Enron
Power Operations Ltd. The explosion killed three employees; a fourth
suffered serious burns. The HSE will publish its report and consider
criminal proceedings after the coroner's inquests, for which no dates have
yet been set.2
|
Heaters
|
The HSE warned electricians and engineers about the
dangers of electric storage heaters, following the collapse of a
prosecution of an electrician for carbon monoxide poisoning.
|
Enforcement |
see also Construction, HSC/E, Manslaughter, Transport - roads |
HSE policy
|
The HSC published in February 2002 the revised version
of its Enforcement policy statement, HSC151 or www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/hsc15.pdf (Enforcement: HSC strengthens
investigation and prosecution policy). Consultation, which closed on 6
October 2000, resulted in 81 responses. The statement sets out, for the
first time, specific criteria to help inspectors decide when to
investigate and prosecute.
|
Directors
|
In July 2001, the HSC issued guidance to help
directors manage health and safety risks (Directors take safety on
board). The guidance includes the recommendation that organisations
appoint a named director for health and safety. The text barely changed
from that consulted on in January 2001 (HSC targets
directors). The HSE received 462 responses, and 12,000 hits on its
website, to the consultative document. Consultation closed in March 2001;
85% of comments supported the guidance as drafted (HSC targets directors). Directors' responsibilities for health and safety,
INDG343, www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg343.pdf, or ISBN 0 7176
2080 8, free.1
On 19
September 2001, Leeds Crown Court set a legal precedent when it ordered
two directors of a firework company to pay fines and costs of more than
£100,000. The conviction of John Mather and Nigel Jackson is unique in
that it is the first time that individual directors have been convicted of
offences by virtue of s.37 of the HSW Act without the company being
convicted of the same offence (Blast
convictions may set legal precedent).
|
Safety Bill
|
No progress is expected on the much-touted Safety at
Work Bill until the 2002 Queen's Speech - at the earliest. The Government
confirmed that it remains committed to introducing the Bill, but will not
say when. Although the Government announced the Bill in the December 2000
Queen's Speech, it failed subsequently even to publish a text or to
include it in the 2001 Queen's Speech. The wide-ranging Bill will increase
the penalties available to magistrates for health and safety offences and
implement recommendations from Revitalising health
and safety. In particular, it will: remove Crown Immunity from
statutory enforcement; improve standards of health and safety in the
workplace; implement the recommendations of Lord Cullen's review of rail
safety (which was trailed in the 2001 Queen's Speech); tackle alcohol and
drug use by safety-critical personnel in civil aviation and shipping; and
set a framework for delivery of the Government's commitments on road
safety.
|
Fines
|
Notable fines in the period covered by the table
included: Yarm Road Ltd and Costain Ltd (£1,025,000 fines and costs, split
equally; BP Grangemouth Oil Refinery Ltd (£750,000 fine, Prosecutions: BP fined £1 million
for "gross dereliction"); Fresha Bakeries Ltd, Harvestime Ltd and two
directors and a senior manager (£628,000 fines and costs, Bakery and directors must pay
£628,000 after two killed in "ghastly" oven tragedy); Thamesway Homes
Ltd (£350,000 fine); London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (£350,000
fine, Carbon monoxide: Council is fined
£350,000); Corus UK Ltd (£300,000 fine, Corus fined £300,000 for
explosion); BP Chemicals Ltd (£250,000, Prosecutions: BP fined £1 million
for "gross dereliction"); Klargester Environmental (£250,000 fines);
Avon Lippiatt Hobbs (Contracting) Ltd (£250,000 fines, Gas: Firm fined £250k for
Abercynon explosion); Amoco (UK) Exploration Company (£204,000 fines
and costs); Mayer Parry (Recycling) Ltd (£200,000 fine, Court fines scrap merchant
£220k); Costain Ltd (£200,000 fine, Company fined
£200,000 for fatal crash); SDC Builders Ltd (£160,000 fines and
costs); Smurfit UK Ltd (£100,000 fine, Smurfit fined
£100,000 over death of a paper worker); Leggett Freightways Ltd
(£100,000 fine, see Workplace transport: Leggett
Freightways fined for second HGV incident).
See Sentencing safety criminals
for a major review of the impact of the four Court of Appeal cases on
sentencing safety criminals. The HSE also published its second "name and
shame" report: Offences and penalties report
2000/01, HSE website: www.hse.gov.uk, free.
|
Foreign companies
|
In early 2002, the European Parliament backed an
initiative to force companies to pay any fines and costs that are imposed
in a member state that is not their country of registration. No progress
has been made since. The initiative, led by the UK, France and Sweden,
would establish mutual recognition of legal judgements within the EU Enforcement: Foreign firms may be
forced to pay fines. The idea was first mooted at a meeting on 1
December 2000, when the European Council on Justice and Home Affairs made
progress towards agreeing a convention. The move followed pressure from
the UK Government after the HSE revealed as slender any chance that the
Swedish designers and installation contractors, Fartygsentreprenader AB
and Fartygskonstructioner AB, would pay the £1.25million fine and costs
imposed after their 1997 conviction for the Port Ramsgate walkway
collapse. A similar situation exists with the fine imposed on Geoconsult
ZT GmBH of Salzburg, Austria after the Heathrow Tunnel collapse.
|
FOD
|
The HSE's Field Operations
Directorate, which covers construction, agriculture, services and
manufacturing, refocused its inspection priorities at the start of April
2002 (see Enforcement: Inspection changes
at HSE).
|
EU |
see also Asbestos, Chemicals, Construction, Enforcement, Noise,
Vibration, Working time |
EU strategy
|
The European Commission published its "strategy" for
improving health and safety in the Union over the next five years. It
contains few concrete legislative proposals (Commission unveils safety
strategy). Adapting to change in work and
society: a new Community strategy on health and safety at work 2002-2006,
Commission of the European Communities, 11 March 2002, COM(2002)118
final.13
|
Directives
|
The European Council of Ministers adopted Directives
on falls from height and working time in the transport sector. It reached
common position on proposed Directives on noise and vibration, and made
progress on proposed Directives on asbestos and exposure values. Details
are provided in this table by subject.
|
Working conditions
|
The Third European Survey on
working conditions revealed that overall working conditions in the EU
had not improved in the decade to 2000. European Foundation for the
Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, tel: +353 1 204 3100,
e-mail: postmaster@eurofound.ie.
|
Explosives |
|
Legislation
|
Consultation closes on 10 June 2002 on HSC proposals
to change the law governing the safe manufacture and storage of
explosives. The move follows a major review of explosives legislation,
which recommended the replacement of the Explosives Act 1875 with new
Regulations, an Approved Code of Practice and guidance.
The condoc
also included proposals arising from the HSE's analysis of responses from
over 50 organisations to its 1999 discussion document (DDE13) on the
extent to which local authorities should deal with explosives safety
issues. Proposals for new Regulations on the
manufacture and storage of explosives, CD 174,1 or www.hse.gov.uk/condocs/CD174.
|
Published
|
Is it explosive? Dangers of
explosives in metal recycling, INDG335, free, packs of 10 leaflets,
ISBN 0 7176 1935 4, £5.1
|
Fire |
see also MHSW Regulations 1999 |
Legislation
|
The Government announced that it intends to have a
unified and simplified fire safety regime in place by mid- to late 2003
(New fire safety regime is set for
2003). Public consultation is scheduled for the middle of this year.
The complexity of the fire safety regime - which includes 120 pieces of
legislation - has vexed governments since the early 1990s. It has been the
subject of a Home Office review in 1993, an interdepartmental review in
1994 and a Home Office consultative document in 1997 (which received 500
responses). All agreed that things had to change. During that period, an
already difficult situation was exacerbated by the implementation of
European Directives, which resulted in parallel and sometimes conflicting
fire safety regimes (Workplace legislation onfire
precautions). A Home Office working party started in 2000 to develop a
coherent regime. The party was working to the Fire Safety Advisory Board,
which is a constituent member of the Central Fire Brigades Advisory
Council. Following the General Election, responsibility for workplace fire
safety was transferred to the Department for Transport, Local Government
and the Regions (DTLR), which is also the HSC/E's sponsoring department.
The DTLR proposals, which will be based on the working party's
recommendations, will use an order under the Regulatory Reform Act "to
simplify, rationalise and consolidate" 120 pieces of existing fire safety
legislation. (A Bill, as primary legislation, would have to find a major
space in the always-crowded parliamentary timetable, whereas an Order can
be made far more quickly.) The order will result in a single, simple
regime applying to all buildings that the public might use. Importantly
for health and safety professionals, the Government's report on regulatory
reform confirms that "the regime will be based on a modern, risk
assessment approach that will be more in line with health and safety
legislation and will provide for greater emphasis on fire prevention. It
will also allow for more efficient and effective enforcement by the fire
service".
|
First aid |
see also Legislation |
Resuscitation
|
The HSE revised and redesigned its Basic advice on first aid at work poster and
leaflet to reflect recommendations on first-aid practice from the
Resuscitation Council. Leaflet, INDG347, free,1 or www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg347.pdf, packs of 20,
ISBN 0 7176 2261 4;1 poster, ISBN 0 7176 2263 0, £12.50 (rigid)1 or ISBN 0 7176 2265
7, £7.50 (encapsulated).1
|
Practice
|
First aiders using Resusci-Annie mannequins have
reported allergic reactions, probably related to the disinfectants used to
clean the mannequins. Details: www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/wa.exe.
|
Published
|
Electric shock: first aid
procedures, poster, ISBN 0 7176 2262 2, £12.50 (rigid)1 and ISBN 0 7176 2264 9, £7.50
(encapsulated);1 Blood-borne viruses in the workplace - guidance for
employers and employees, INDG342, free.1
|
Gas |
See also Electricity, Manslaughter |
Mains
|
The HSE said that the replacement of all iron gas
mains in Britain located within 30 metres of buildings would be achieved
within 30, rather than the original 35, years. HSE statement: www.hse.gov.uk/gas/gasmain.pdf.
|
Campaign
|
An HSE £250,000 publicity carbon monoxide campaign
targeted first-time renters. "You thought it was suffocating living with
your parents": HSE gas safety advice line, tel 0800 300363, or www.hse.gov.uk/gas/index.htm.
|
Review
|
The HSC has set up a revised gas safety sub-committee
to implement the elements of the fundamental review of gas safety for
which it is responsible. The committee has five working groups, which have
been meeting since July 2001. There have been delays, however, and the
first implementing Regulations have not yet been laid. The HSE is also
hopeful that the Safety Bill will include a provision for a gas levy to
fund publicity and research. After the HSE completed its review, the HSC
sent a report to ministers at the Department of the Environment, Transport
and the Regions. DETR minister Lord Whitty approved the HSC's proposals in
March 2001. The DETR is now consulting with other government departments
about issues that cut across departments. Gas
safety review: proposals for change, www.hse.gov.uk/spd/content/fundgas.htm. The HSE
received over 700 responses to its 1999 discussion document. Details on
the working groups' progress: www.hse.gov.uk/gas/.
Issues
examined in 2000 in regard to the Gas Safety (Management) Regulations 1996
(GSMR) will now be addressed in line with the timetable for the
fundamental review of gas safety. This is because some outcomes of the
review might also affect the 1996 Regulations, including changes to the
role of emergency service providers. The Regulations address the security
of supply of natural gas and safety standards of emergency services
provided by the gas industry. Consultation ended on 10 December 1999 and
the HSC approved the HSE's analysis of responses on 15 August 2000. Proposals for the Gas Safety (Management) (Amendment)
Regulations 2000, CD152, free.1
|
Transco
|
The HSE issued a Certificate of Exemption under the
Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations 19983 on 1 April 2002 to allow Transco to continue
providing an emergency service for six further months, without the need
for Corgi registration.2
|
Published
|
Joint industry programme on
carbon monoxide issues, CRRs nos. 374/2001 - 384/2001, prices
£10-£25,1 Reducing
CO incidents, CRR 386/2001, ISBN 0 7176 2136 7, £10;1 Long-term reliability
of domestic CO alarms, HSE CRR 360/2001, www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_pdf/2001/crr01360.pdfor
ISBN 0 7176 2085 9, £25;1 A model to predict build-up of carbon monoxide from a
faulty appliance in a single room, CRR 341/2001, ISBN 0 7176 2017 4,
£20;1 Assessment of
methods to detect leaks in the casing of room-sealed appliances, CRR
406/2002, ISBN 0 7176 2259 2, £25.1
|
GMOs |
|
Contained use
|
The public register of information on the contained
use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) reopened in mid-February 2002
(R2P2: Determining the
acceptability of risk). The HSE closed the register because of
national security concerns following the anthrax attacks in the US in the
wake of 11 September 2001. The HSE proposed an emergency amendment to the
Genetically Modified Organisms (Contained Use) Regulations 2000, to give
the Government discretion to withhold information about GMOs, including
their location, from the register. The resulting GMO (Contained Use)
(Amendment) Regulations were laid before Parliament on 18 February 2002,
following a brief consultation. Consultation letter: www.hse.gov.uk/condocs.index.htm.
|
HSC/E |
see also Enforcement, Local authorities |
Revitalising
|
Progress on the HSE's implementation of the 44 action
points from its core Revitalising health and safety
can be found throughout this table. The
HSE's summary of progress can be found at: www.hse.gov.uk/revitalising/progress/summary.htm.
Revitalising set targets to be achieved by 2010.
These are reductions of: 30% in the number of working days lost per
100,000 workers from work-related injury and ill health; 20% in the
incidence rate of cases of work-related ill health; and 10% in the
incidence rate of fatalities and major injuries. Half of each improvement
is to be achieved by 2004/05. The HSE subsequently set out 17 principles
for assessing progress towards the targets: Achieving the "Revitalising health and safety"
targets: statistical note on progress measurement, www.hse.gov.uk/hsestats/statnote/pdf.
The HSE later
published its first annual report on progress towards the Revitalising targets: www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/snoct01.pdf. This showed
that the fatal and major injury rate for 2000/01 was not significantly
different from the base year of 1999/2000. The HSE is unable to assess any
ill-health trends.
|
Securing health
together
|
The Securing health
together initiative was launched in July 2000 and represents the HSE
and Government's 10-year occupational health strategy (Healthy at work, healthy for life:
HSC/E goes holistic). It has a partnership board responsible for
overseeing progress towards achieving the targets set out in the strategy.
The board has now met four times, and is due to meet again on 21 May 2002.
Its last meeting, on 7 November 2001, discussed the role of the board, the
progress made under the strategy, and vocational rehabilitation and job
retention. Previous meetings: established the main priorities for the
initiative as stress and musculoskeletal disorders; looked at the
difficulties of establishing baseline figures against which the HSE could
measure progress towards its targets (see Revitalising above); and considered how
the strategy would tackle the health effects of work on members of the
public. Details are given throughout this table and are available on the
strategy's website, which also has the programme of work and a best
practice database: www.ohstrategy.net/.
|
Plan of work
|
The HSC published a strategic plan for its work
activities for the three years until April 2004 (HSC strategic plan 2001/04).
The plan sets out eight priority areas: falls from heights, workplace
transport, musculoskeletal disorders, stress, slips and trips,
agriculture, construction and the health services. Strategic plan 2001/2004, C35 10/01, free1 or www.hse.gov.uk/action/frameset/plan.htm.
|
Effectiveness
|
HSE-commissioned research found little evidence
linking HSE interventions to reductions in workplace harm. The impact of the HSC/E: a review, CRR 385/2001
ISBN 0 7176 2132 4, £15.1
|
Intermediaries
|
A pilot project to use local intermediaries to improve
the flow of health and safety information between the HSE and companies
produced encouraging results. Working with local
intermediaries - an evaluation of HSE's Field Operations Directorate pilot
project, CRR 389/2001, ISBN 0 7176 2145 6 £15.1
|
Research
|
The HSC/E published details of their current health
and safety research activities and anticipated £20m research requirements
for 2002. Strategic research outlook 2002, Jill
Thompson, tel: 0114 289 2321, email: jill.thompson@hse.gsi.gov.uk,
website: www.hse.gov.uk/research/content/opps/sro2002.pdf
|
Infrastructure
|
The HSE announced that it would close its Electrical
Equipment Certification Service (EECS) at the end of June 2003.
The Government
gave the go-ahead for the construction of purpose-built premises for the
Health and Safety Laboratory, an agency of the HSE. Work will finish in
summer 2004.2
The HSE
shortlisted three property developers to build its new Merseyside
headquarters. The HSE expects to award a 30-year contract in 2003 for the
provision of fully serviced accommodation. The HSE hopes to occupy its new
premises by the end of 2004.
|
Appointments
|
The Government appointed two new HSC commissioners:
Judith Hackitt, Chemical Industries Association, and John Longworth, Tesco
plc. It reappointed George Brumwell, Margaret Burns, Abdul Chowdry and
Owen Tudor. All appointments last for three years.
Justin
McCracken succeeded David Eves as the HSE's deputy director general,
operations, in April 2002. McCracken is responsible for all HSE field
inspectors and HSE operations in mines, offshore, rail, construction,
agriculture, health services, chemicals and nuclear safety.
|
Published
|
HSC annual report and HSC/E
accounts 2000/01, ISBN 0 10291307 2, £22.50;3 summary: Highlights
from the HSC annual report and accounts 2000/01, misc 422, free;1 Health and safety
statistics 2000/01, £17.501 or www.hse.gov/uk/statistics/hss001.pdf; Science and innovation strategy, www.hse.gov.uk/research/content/strat01.pdf; The health and safety system in Great Britain,
ISBN 0 7176 2243 6, price £8.50 or www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/ohsingb.pdf; The health and safety system in Great Britain,
ISBN 0 7176 2243 6, price £8.50 or www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/ohsingb.pdf.
|
Human factors |
|
Published
|
Proposed framework for
addressing human factors in IEC 61508, CRR 373/2001, ISBN 0 7176 2114
6, £15;1 Assessing
the safety of staffing arrangements for process operations in the chemical
and allied industries, CRR 348/2001, ISBN 0 7176 2044 1, £20;1 Development of a
multiskilling life cycle model, CRR 328/2001, ISBN 0 7176 2001 8,
£20;1 Work, health
and safety in the UK oil and gas industry, CRR 314/2001, ISBN 0 7176
1917 6, £20.1
|
Information |
|
Annual reports
|
Just under a third of Britain's top companies have so
far responded to a request from the HSC Chair Bill Callaghan and
Environment Minister Michael Meacher to set targets for improving their
health and safety performance, and to describe the performance in their
annual reports, starting with 2000/01 (see Annual reports: Top 350 firms
shun Government reporting "invitation"). The HSE reports that, at 14
May 2002, 103 companies had responded to the "challenge", 69% of which had
committed to reporting more fully their health and safety policies and
principles (45% report currently), 56% to reporting on targets (30% report
currently) and 60% reporting on performance (21% report currently).
Guidance is set out in: Health and safety in annual
reports, www.hse.gov.uk/revital/annual.htm.
|
Workers
|
The HSE added a "workers' web page" to its free
electronic information site: www.hse.gov.uk/workers.
|
Campaign
|
In the second half of 2001, the HSE and Granada TV ran
a six-month series of 50 mini-programmes on workplace health and
safety.
|
Ethnic minorities
|
The HSE published basic health and safety information
in five languages: Health and safety law: what you
should know, www.hse.gov.uk/bengali/c3750.pdf (replace
"bengali" with the language required), or in packs of 25: ISBNs 0 7176
2028 x (Bengali), 0 7176 2026 3
(Gujarati), 0 7176 2029 8 (Hindi), 0 7176 2024 7 (Punjabi), 0 7176 2025 5
(Urdu) and 0 7176 2027 1 (Chinese), £5.1
|
Legislation |
|
Regulations made
|
The Genetically Modified Organisms (Contained Use)
(Amendment) Regulations 2002; The Radiation (Emergency Preparedness and
Public Information) Regulations 2001; The Railway Safety (Miscellaneous
Amendments) Regulations 2001; The Railway (Safety Case) (Amendment)
Regulations 2001.
|
Regulations proposed
|
Consultation closed on 1 February 2002 on proposed HSC
changes to eight sets of Regulations to rectify deficiencies in its
implementation of European Directives and clarify "minor drafting
problems". The Regulations cover display screen equipment (DSE), manual
handling operations, personal protective equipment, the workplace,
provision and use of work equipment, lifting operations and lifting
equipment, first aid, and quarries. The HSC claims the changes are minor
and will have little practical effect for those complying with the
existing law. The HSE received almost 200 responses to its consultation -
a higher than average return. Although respondents were generally
supportive of the proposals, there were a few issues that required further
investigation, including how the proposed changes to the PPE and DSE regs
would impact on industry. The HSC was due to consider the HSE's full
analysis of the consultation results on 14 May 2002 (paper no.HSC/02/56).
The paper and analysis were due to be available from mid-May at: http://213.212.77.20/foi/hsc_meetings/2000/papers/index.htm.
The current timetable was for the HSC to write to ministers by 17 May
2002, requesting them to consider the draft Regulations and make the
necessary arrangements by the end of May. The Regulations would be made
and laid in Parliament by 17 June. These would lay in Parliament for 40
working days, coming into effect by the middle of August. The HSE believes
that it is unlikely that this timetable will slip, as it would be unusual
for a MP to pray on the Regulations and force a debate. Proposals for Regulations to amend the Personal
Protective Equipment at Work, the Manual Handling Operations, the
Workplace and the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations, CD
175, free.1
|
Leisure |
|
Fairgrounds
|
A major HSE review of fairground safety recommended
that ride examiners become registered and accredited under the United
Kingdom Accreditation Service. Report: www.hse.gov.uk/spd/noframes/spdleis.htm.
|
Zoos
|
Consultation closed on 5 November 2001 on HSC
proposals to replace the ACoP on health and safety standards for zoos with
guidance. The HSE is still analysing the responses. Proposals to withdraw the ACoP: Zoos - safety, health
and welfare standards for employers and persons at work 1985, CD 170,
free1 or www.hse.gov.uk/condocs/cd170.htm.
|
Targets
|
The HSE agreed a strategy with the Food and Drink
Federation (FDF) and four unions - the GMB, TGWU, USDAW and BFAWU - to
realise the Government and HSC's injury and ill-health reduction targets.
A recipe for safety, TOP05 - rev1, free.1
|
Published
|
Playgrounds - risks, benefits
and choices, CRR 426/2002, ISBN 0 7176 2340 8, £20;1 Cemeteries are not
playgrounds - be respectful, be safe too, free;1 Preventing falls from
height in the food and drink industries, Food Information Sheet no.30,
free;1 Reducing
injuries caused by sack handling in the food and drink industries,
Food Information Sheet no.31, free;1 Reducing noise exposure in the food and drink
industries, Food Information Sheet no.32, free;1 Health and safety of
children and young people in catering, catering information sheet
no.21, free.1
|
Local authorities |
see also Explosives |
Enforcement
|
A three-year decline in resources that local
authorities (LAs) devote to health and safety enforcement forced HSC Chair
Bill Callaghan to tell LAs to improve their performance. HSE/LA enforcement liaison committee (HELA) annual
report 2001, HELA National Picture 2001, HELA strategic plan 2001-04, all free1 or 8.
The HSC issued
revised enforcement guidance for LAs. This requires an inter-authority
audit of each LA's enforcement function at least once every five years.
LAs will also have to make specific reference to implementing the new HELA
strategy in their plans of work. Section 18: HSC
guidance to local authorities, free1 or
8. In December 2001, the HSC agreed the
first performance indicator for LAs' management of their health and safety
regulatory activities.
|
Lead authorities
|
The HSE has launched its revised Lead Authority
Partnership Scheme in December 2001. The voluntary scheme involves a
partnership between a lead local authority (LA) and an organisation that
operates in several LA areas. The scheme allows the organisation to deal
with one LA rather than with many and aims to improve consistency in
health and safety enforcement. The revisions bring trade associations and
smaller organisations into the scope of the scheme. HELA will consider a
report on the success of the revised scheme by December 2002. The
three-month consultation process on revisions to the scheme ended on 15
March 2001. As part of the process, the HSE hosted in 2001 its first
tripartite conference of local authorities, trade unions and employers'
organisations.2
An
HSE-commissioned evaluation found that local authorities and their partner
organisations were benefiting from two new forms of partnership set up
under the Lead Authority Partnership Scheme. Evaluating the new flexible and trade partnerships
within HELA's LAPS: one year on, CRR 347/2001, ISBN 0 7176 2043 3,
£101 or www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_pdf/2001/crr01347.pdf.
|
Published
|
Care homes guidance, HSG
220, £8.50;1 Guidance on working with small firms, Local
Authority Circular;1 Lead authority partnership scheme, misc 428.1
|
Major hazards |
see also Human factors |
COMAH
|
The regulatory enforcer (the HSE and Environment
Agency) for the UK's major accident hazard sites expressed concern at the
magnitude and frequency of accidents at such sites. COMAH major accidents notified to the European
Commission, England, Scotland and Wales 1999-2000 and COMAH major
accidents 1999-2000, a summary, www.hse.gov.uk/hid_HIDActivities_COMAH.
|
Charging
|
When introducing the Control of Major Accident Hazards
(COMAH) charging scheme, the HSC and ministers agreed to a review after
two years of operation. Deloitte and Touche carried out a fact-finding
exercise to inform the review, which has now been completed. The HSC has
reported the findings to ministers. The review concluded that no
fundamental change should be made to the COMAH charging scheme. At the
same time, the HSC reported the outcomes of three other reviews. The first
examined the efficiency of the administrative processes; although
inefficiencies were identified, the HSE has already addressed some of
these. A second review, of the effectiveness of the queries and disputes
procedure, found it to be effective if somewhat bureaucratic, and the HSE
does not plan to change the procedure. The third review looked at the
reasonableness of the HSE's charge-out rates in comparison with public and
private sector organisations, concluding that the HSE's rates appear high.
The HSE says that it is committed to reducing costs included in the
charge-out rates, as recommended by the consultants. Deloitte and Touche's
reports and the HSC/E's response were due to be placed on the HSE's
website as HSB went to press: www.hse.gov.uk/charging.
|
Regulation
|
Consultation closed on 28 January 2001 on an HSE
discussion document on its approach to the regulation of the offshore,
railway, chemical and nuclear industries - all of which are based on
safety cases. The HSE received about 70 responses. These raised numerous
issues, particularly the need for greater clarity about the HSC/E's
approach to the permissioning regimes. The HSE delayed follow-up work
pending the outcome of Lord Cullen's Ladbroke Grove Inquiry (see below),
but it is now exploring these issues with stakeholders. The HSC will soon
decide how it wants to take the work forward. Regulating higher hazards - exploring the issues,
DDE 15, www.hse.gov.uk/disdocs/dde15.htm or 1.
|
Published
|
Performance indicators for the
assessment of emergency preparedness in major accident hazards, CRR
345/2001, ISBN 0 7176 2038 7, £20;1 The derivation and use of population data for major
hazard accident modelling, CRR 410/2002, ISBN 0 7176 2271 1, £30.1
|
Management |
see also Legislation |
Standard
|
The United Nations' International Labour Organisation
issued guidance on the design of occupational safety and health management
systems: www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/gb/docs/gb281/pdf/gb-4.pdf.
|
Measurement
|
From December 2001, organisations have been able to
use an HSE web-based guide to measuring health and safety performance. The
guide builds on HSG65, Successful health and safety
management. The HSE would welcome comments and suggestions for case
studies, and will be updating the guide: www.hse.gov.uk/opsunit/perfmeas.htm.
|
MHSW Regulations |
|
Civil liability
|
Consultation was extended until 28 March 2002 on HSC
proposals to remove the civil liability exclusion from the Management of
Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 (MHSW) and the Fire Precautions
(Workplace) Regulations 1997. The HSE received 126 responses to the
consultative document. It is now analysing the responses and will submit a
report to the HSC in June or July. Consultative
proposals to amend the MHSW and the Fire Precautions (Workplace)
Regulations 1997, CD 177, www.hse.gov.uk/condocs/cd177.htm.
|
Manslaughter |
|
Corporate killing
|
There has been little progress in 2002 on a proposed
new offence of corporate killing, although the Government did confirm that
it remains committed to reforming the current laws of manslaughter.
Consultation on the proposals ended on 1 September 2000. The Home Office
received 166 responses to its proposals - nearly all favoured change. Home
Office minister Keith Bradley said in June 2001 that the Government had
not yet made "final decisions" in the light of the comments received. The
unresolved issues concern the sanctions that can be taken against
individual directors. The reform is a Labour Party manifesto commitment.
The new offence would avoid the problems of securing a conviction of a
company under the current law of manslaughter. Sanctions would include
(unlimited) fines, remedy orders, disqualification of directors (probably)
and imprisonment (possibly). Reforming the law of
involuntary manslaughter: the Government's proposals. The HSC supports the new offence: Reforming the law on involuntary manslaughter: the
HSC's response to the Government's proposals, free.2
|
Prison
|
In November 2001, two farmers received suspended jail
sentences for the manslaughter of an agricultural student (Farmers face jail for
manslaughter). Edward Crow and Alaister Crow were jailed for 12 and 15
months, suspended for one year, after Lee Smith was killed driving a
loader that he was not trained to do.
On 7 December
2001, a farmer and one of his employees were each sentenced to six months'
imprisonment, suspended for 18 months. Edward Muntz and Thomas Marchant
were found guilty of causing the death of a motorcyclist, Richard
Fletcher, who collided with an unguarded spike mounted on a tractor driven
by Marchant. Neither was disqualified from driving (Transport: Road death leads to
prison sentences but no driving disqualifications).
On 7 May 2002,
a gas fitter became the fourth person to receive a prison sentence for
contravening an HSE prohibition notice. Magistrates jailed Mark Towle for
four months for carrying out gas fitting work in contravention of the
notice. He is the first gas fitter and the sixth person in all to be
jailed under HSW Act-related legislation. Three other fitters have
previously been jailed for manslaughter (see Enforcement: Gas fitter jailed
for prohibition breach).
Brian Dean was
convicted on 24 April 2002 of the manslaughter of a father and son
following the collapse of a kiln. Stafford Crown Court delayed sentencing
until the end of May.
|
Failed cases
|
In December 2001, an Old Bailey jury found Euromin Ltd
and its general manager, James Martell, not guilty of the manslaughter of
Simon Jones at Shoreham Docks. The jury did, however, convict the company
of crimes under the HSW Act, for which it was fined £50,000. The
high-profile case reached trial after the Court of Appeal told the Crown
Prosecution Service in a judicial review on 23 March 2000 that its
decision not to prosecute was "unlawful" and irrational.
Oakes Millers
Ltd, HJ Lea Oakes Ltd and a director were cleared of manslaughter charges
after a judge ruled there was insufficient evidence that their failings
caused the death of a boy killed by one of the company's HGVs. Both firms
were convicted under health and safety legislation (Judge dismisses manslaughter chargers for
boy's death).
|
Judicial review
|
The HSE announced that it would, after all, prosecute
two parties involved in the death of Mohammed Omar Akhtar, who was killed
after his car collided with a forklift truck in 1997. The HSE initially
failed to investigate the incident, on the grounds that it was a road
traffic accident, but a judicial review resulted in the High Court
ordering it to do so. The cases were committed for Crown Court trial by
Trafford magistrates on 11 October 2001. Manchester Crown Court was due to
hear pleas and direction on 17 May 2002.
|
Manual handling |
see also Agriculture, Legislation, Leisure |
Regulations
|
One in three organisations have not taken any action
to comply with the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992, which came
into force in 1993. Second evaluation of the Manual
Handling Operations Regulations 1992 and guidance, CRR 346/2001, Entec
UK Ltd, www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_pdf/2001/crr01346.pdf.
|
Published
|
Handling home care: achieving
safe, efficient and positive outcomes for care workers and clients,
HSG225, ISBN 0 7176 2228 2 £9.50.1
|
Mines and quarries |
see also Legislation |
Published
|
The use of electricity in
mines. Electricity at Work Regulations 1989. Approved Code of Practice -
2001 edition (L128), ISBN 0 7176 2074 3, £15;1 Assessment of a
continuous miner wet head system, CRR 301/2000, ISBN 0 7176 1864 1,
£25;1 Fire safety
testing of conveyor belts, CRR 407/2002, ISBN 0 7176 2266 5, £15.1
|
Noise |
|
Proposed Directive
|
At the end of October 2001, the EU Environment Council
formally adopted a common position on a proposed Directive on noise and
hearing. The proposal would be the first physical agents Directive (see Vibration below). The original proposal,
published in 1993, was for a single physical agents Directive, covering
noise, vibration and non-ionising electromagnetic radiation. This made
little progress, and the Commission decided to proceed with each area
separately. Social affairs ministers had reached political agreement on a
noise common position on 11 June 2001. The Directive would replace the
1986 noise Directive and changes to the Noise at Work Regulations 1989.
The proposal fixes exposure limit values and action values and would
replace the existing noise Directive with legislation in line with the
1989 Framework Directive. The important issue for the UK on a noise
initiative would be the extent to which additional audiometry would be
needed in the UK. The employers' organisation, UNICE, said on 19 April
2001 that it can see no justification for more stringent rules in this
area (www.unice.org/unice/docum.nsf/).
|
Published
|
Occupational exposure to noise
and hearing difficulties in Great Britain, CRR 361/2001, ISBN 07176
2087 5, £151 or www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_htm/2001/crr01361.htm.
|
Nuclear |
see also Major hazards, Radiation |
Incidents
|
There were seven nuclear incidents in Britain in 2001,
at Heysham 1 (British Energy Generation Limited), Hunterston B (British
Energy Generation UK plc), Sellafield (three) and Chapelcross (two) (both
British Nuclear Fuels plc). Six were classified as level 1 on the
International Nuclear Event Scale. One was classified at level 0. Statement of nuclear Incidents at nuclear
installations: first quarter - fourth quarter 2001, free.5
|
Skills
|
The HSE is participating in a study of the future
availability of skills for the application of nuclear and radiological
technology. The study was prompted by concerns about ageing workforces and
poor recruitment into science and technology. Details: www.nuclearskills.com.
|
Published
|
Relicensing of the Atomic
Weapons Establishment Sites to AWE plc - report on the performance of AWE
plc as a licensee 12 months after the relicensing of Aldermaston and
Burghfield on 1 April 2000, free,5 or
www.hse.gov.uk/nsd/licensee.pdf; Progress report on HM Nuclear Installations
Inspectorate (NII) safety management audit of BEG and BEG(UK)L - June
2001, free5 or www.hse.gov.uk/nsd/beguk.pdf; A review by the NII of the British Energy plc's
strategy for decommissioning of its nuclear licensed sites, free5 or www.hse.gov.uk/nsd/beqqr.pdf; The storage of liquid high-level waste at BNFL,
Sellafield: addendum to February 2000 report, free;5 Safety audit of
Dounreay 1998: final report 2001,5 or
www.hse.gov.uk/nsd/auditfin.pdf; A report by NII of an investigation into a dropped
fuel element incident at Chapelcross Nuclear Power Station, free5 or www.hse.gov.uk/nsd/nsdhome; A review by NII of Magnox Electric plc's strategy for
decommissioning its nuclear licensed sites, free5 or www.hse.gov.uk/nsd/magdecom.pdf.
|
Offshore |
see also Major hazards |
Legislation
|
The Health and Safety at Work
etc Act 1974 (Application outside Great Britain) Order 2001 came into
effect on 11 July 2001. It applies the HSW Act to the use and operation of
all buildings and structures within the 12-mile territorial sea, (SI 2001
No.2127, ISBN 0 11 029567 6, £23 or www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/si/si2001/20012127.htm.
|
Enforcement
|
The HSE website now contains all offshore operations
notices (www.hse.gov.uk/hid/osd/notices/on_index.htm) and
safety notices (www.hse.gov.uk/hid/osd/notices/sn_index.htm).
|
Published
|
Hydrocarbon releases
statistics 2001, HID statistics report HSR 2001 002, HID Data
Management Team, tel: 0151 951 3099, free or www.hse.gov.uk/hid/osd/hsr2001/contents.htm; Report on the hydrocarbon release investigation
project 1/4/200 to 31/3/2001, Offshore Technology Report OTO 2001/055,
free1 or www.hse.gov.uk/research/frameset/offshore.htm; Offshore safety statistics bulletin 2000/01, free,
www.hse.gov.uk/osd/stat0001.htm; Offshore injury, ill health and incident statistics
report 2000/2001 (Provisional data), HSR 2001 001, free7 or www.hse.gov.uk/hid/osd/HSR2000-001.htm; Technical guidance on the safe use of lifting
equipment offshore, HSG221, ISBN 0 7176 2100 6, £15.1
|
Participation and Partnership |
|
Benefits
|
The HSE published research showing that organisations
that involve employees in improving occupational health and safety benefit
from improved incident and injury rates. Employee
involvement in health and safety - some examples of good practice,1 or www.hse.gov.uk/research/hsl_pdf/2001/employ-i.pdf.
|
PPE |
see also Legislation |
Published
|
Industrial rope access -
investigation into items of personal protective equipment, CRR
364/2001, ISBN 07176 20913, £20;1 Assessment of aprons for protection against drop
forging projectiles, CRR 395/2001, ISBN 0
7176 2233 9, £10.1
|
Pesticides |
see also Agriculture |
Dichlorvos
|
Ministers have suspended the sale of agricultural,
professional and domestic insecticide products containing the chemical
dichlorvos. Further information: HSE, tel: 0151 951 5825;
www.pesticides.gov.uk/committees/acp/acp.htm and www.doh.gov.uk/com.htm.
|
Published
|
Pesticide Incidents Report
1999/2000, free;12 Biocidal products Directive (BPD) 98/8/EC fact sheets
nos 10, 11, free,1 or www.hse.gov.uk/hthdir/noframes/bioindex.htm; The effectiveness of labelling pesticides, CRR
390, ISBN 0 7176 2146 4, £20.1
|
Pressure |
|
Published
|
Probabilistic methods: uses
and abuses in structural integrity, CRR 398/2001, ISBN 0 7176 2238 X,
£25.1
|
Radiation |
|
Emergencies
|
The Radiation (Emergency Preparedness and Public
Information) Regulations 2001 came into force on 20 September 2001. The
Regulations represent the second part of the HSC's implementation of the
1996 "basic safety standards" Directive (96/29/Euratom). The HSE received
110 responses to its 1999 consultative document (CD 144, free).1 The HSE later issued related guidance on
planning for emergencies involving radiation releases with the potential
to affect the public.1
|
Pregnancy
|
HSE-commissioned research found that a foetus can
receive a higher dose of radiation than the mother can. Doses to the embryo/foetus and neonate from intakes of
radionuclides by the mother - part 1: doses received in utero and from
activity present at birth, National Radiological Protection Board, CRR
397/2001, £20.1
|
Published
|
The regulatory requirements
for medical exposure to radiation: an employer's overview, HSG223,
ISBN 0 7176 2134 0, £6.50;1 Selection, use and maintenance of portable monitoring
instruments and Control of radioactive
substances, Information sheet nos. 7 and 8.1
|
Railways |
|
Cullen part 1
|
The HSE welcomed part 1 of Lord Cullen's Ladbroke
Grove Rail Inquiry (LGRI) report, which was published on 19 June 2001. The Ladbroke Grove Rail Inquiry - part 1 report,
ISBN 0 7176 2065 5, £25,1 or www.hse.gov.uk/railway/paddrail/lgri1.pdf. Cullen
wanted 40 of his 89 recommendations in place by December 2001; the
industry managed just 23. Work on a further 10 is due to be completed by
June 2002, with the remaining seven implemented by the end of 2002. HSC
Chair Bill Callaghan described the progress as "satisfactory". Ladbroke Grove Rail Inquiry - part 1 report: progress
report to December 2001, www.hse.gov.uk/railway/lgrprog1.pdf.
The Railway
Safety (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2001 were laid before
Parliament on 3 October 2001 and came into force three weeks later.3 They implement important recommendations from
part 1 of the Cullen report. Associated guidance: L52(rev), ISBN 0 7176
2127 8, £20.1 On 7 August 2001, the HSC
completed a 25-day consultation on placing an explicit duty on train
companies to detail passenger emergency evacuation arrangements. The
proposal implemented a Cullen part 1 recommendation. Proposed amendment to the Railway (Safety Case)
Regulations 2000: emergency escape from trains, www.hse.gov.uk/condocs/rscr2000.pdf. The
subsequent amendments, which came into force on 24 October 2001, are
contained in the reprinted HSE guidance booklet, Railways (Safety Case) Regulations 2000, L52.1
|
Cullen part 2
|
The second part of Lord Cullen's report on Ladbroke
Grove made 74 recommendations, including a new independent railway
industry safety body to develop railway standards, provide safety
leadership and sponsor research and development. The Ladbroke Grove Rail Inquiry part 2 report,
ISBN 0 7176 2107 3, £201 or www.hse.gov.uk/railway/paddrail/lgri2.pdf.
The HSC
consulted on amendments to the Railways (Safety Case) Regulations 20003 to bring the safety regime in line with the
Rail Regulator's proposed independent railway industry safety body. The
move would implement a recommendation of Cullen part 2. The HSE received
replies to the consultation exercise up to the end of April and is now
considering these. The aim is to make any necessary amendments to the
Regulations by the time the new body is created, probably towards the end
of 2002. Consultation paper: www.hse.gov.uk/condocs/condocs/rsc00-a.pdf.
|
Train protection systems
|
Uncertainty now surrounds the introduction of the
European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) on the UK mainline
network. The HSC has asked independent experts to review the report into
train protection systems published on 25 April 2002 by the Strategic Rail
Authority and Railway Safety. The report contains an industry plan for
implementing a fundamental recommendation of the March 2001 report of
Professor Uff and Lord Cullen's Joint Inquiry into
train protection systems (The future
for UK train protection systems). The report called for the
installation of ERTMS on the UK mainline network to a defined timetable.
This, its authors believed, would minimise the risk of train accidents
caused by signals passed at danger (SPADs). Consultation closed on 12
April 2002 on the form of Regulations that will require the fitting of the
ERTMS. The HSC will advise ministers in early 2003 on the appropriate
framework. The HSE also published its first action plan for implementing
the report's recommendations: www.hse.gov.uk/railway/jirprt1.pdf.
|
Potters Bar
|
The HSE's first report on its investigation into the
train derailment at Potters Bar, in which seven people were killed, states
that the early indications are that a fault in points south of the station
was the cause. Train derailment at Potters Bar,
Friday 10 May 2002 - HSE interim report, www.hse.gov.uk/railway/pottersbar/interim1.htm.
|
Southall
|
Following consultation, the HSC withdrew a proposal to
make it a legal requirement to have on-train data recorders in the
three-quarters of existing driving cabs that do not have one, by the end
of 2005. The move would have implemented - albeit over a longer period - a
recommendation made by the public inquiry report into the Southall train
crash. Consultation closed on 15 June 2001. Draft
Railway Safety Regulations 2001: invitation to comment, www.hse.gov.uk/condocs/cd-rail.htm.
|
Great Heck
|
An HSC report into the obstruction of railway lines by
vehicles concluded that the risks of such incidents are low compared with
other rail and road risks. The Government accepted the report's seven
recommendations, and asked the HSE to expedite its implementation
timetable. The report was commissioned after a vehicle overshot a road at
Great Heck, near Selby, on 28 February 2001 onto the tracks below. The
subsequent train collision killed 10 people. Obstruction of the railway by road vehicles, ISBN
0 7176 2294 0, £5,1 or www.hse.gov.uk/railway/obstruct.htm.
|
Railtrack
|
The HSE issued a formal Direction in October 2001 to
Railtrack plc to revise its safety case to reflect organisational and
administrative changes caused by it being placed in administration.
|
London Underground
|
The HSE compiled an "issues log" following an initial
assessment of London Underground Ltd's (LUL's) safety case documents. The
move is part of LUL's move to a public-private partnership. PPP cannot
operate until the HSE has accepted version 3.1 of LUL's safety case. The
log identifies 52 shortcomings. A health and safety
review of London Underground and its preparations for the PPP - revision
1: February 2002, www.hse.gov.uk/railways/lul2.pdf or HM Railway
Inspectorate, HSE4. On 3 December 2001, the
HSE formally accepted version 3.0 of LUL's revised railway safety
case.2
|
Appointments
|
The post-Cullen fallout within the HSC/E continued.
HSC commissioner Margaret Burns was appointed chair of the HSC's railway
industry advisory committee (RIAC). Richard Clifton succeeded Clive Norris
as temporary head of HSE's railways directorate. Former HSE railway chief
Vic Coleman moved to the HSE's safety policy directorate, and Allan Sefton
is now overseeing the management of the railway inspectorate (HMRI).
|
Radioactive material
|
The HSC proposed changes to legislation on the
carriage of radioactive material by rail. The move will implement
Commission Directive 2001/6/EC of 29 January 2001, the third adaptation of
Council Directive 96/49/EC. Member states were required to implement its
provisions for radioactive material by 31 December 2001. The proposals
would replace the Packaging, Labelling and Carriage of Dangerous Goods by
Rail Regulations 1996. The HSC will issue further proposals in 2002 on the
carriage of other classes of dangerous goods by road and rail. Proposals for the Packaging, Labelling and Carriage of
Radioactive Material by Rail Regulations, CD 172, free.1
|
Published
|
Railway safety - HM Chief
Inspector of Railways' annual report on the safety record of the railways
in Great Britain during 2000/01, ISBN 0 7176 2126 X, £16.95;1 Railway safety 2000/01,
www.hse.gov.uk/railway/rsb0001.pdf; Summary of the findings of HMRI's inspection of driver
management in train operating companies carried out in 2000/01,
Accidents Section, HMRI, HSE4, or www.hse.gov.uk/railway/rihome.htm; Railways (Safety Case) Regulations 2000 including 2001
amendments - guidance on Regulations, L52(rev), ISBN 0 7176 2127 8,
£20;1 Assessment of
Railtrack's response to improvement notice I/RJS/991007/2 covering the
"Top 22" signals passed most often at danger, ISBN 0 7176 2257 6,
£10,1 or www.hse.gov.uk/railway/rihome.htm; Assessment of Railtrack's management of multi-SPAD
signals, ISBN 0 7176 2258 4, £10,1 or
www.hse.gov.uk/railway/rihome.htm; Passenger-carrying miniature railways: guidance on
safe practice, ISBN 0 7176 2035 2, £5.95;1 Provision of welfare
facilities at transient railway-infrastructure maintenance and renewal
sites information sheet, free;1 Developing and maintaining staff competence (Railway
safety principles and guidance, part 3, section A), ISBN 0 7176 1732
7, £12.95.1
|
Risk |
|
Assessment
|
The HSE published its methodology for deciding whether
risks from work activity are unacceptable, tolerable and negligible, and
how it balances ethical, social, economic and scientific considerations in
reaching its decisions. Reducing risks, protecting
people, ISBN 0 7176 2151 0, £51 or www.hse.gov.uk/dst/r2p2.pdf (R2P2: Determining the acceptability of
risk). Consultation had ended in December 1999.
The HSE also
published the guidance that its staff use to decide whether duty holders
have reduced risks "as low as reasonably practicable" (ALARP): www.hse.gov.uk/dst/alarp1.htm, www.hse.gov.uk/dst/alarp2.htm, and www.hse.gov.uk/dst/alarp3.htm
|
Safety reps |
|
Review
|
The HSC confirmed that it is to replace the Safety
Representative and Safety Committees Regulations 1977. The move is part of
a two-part strategy to improve employers' consultation with workers on
health and safety matters. It follows the HSE's analysis of 850 responses
to a 1999 discussion document (DDE12). The first part of the strategy will
involve a consultative document containing draft Regulations, an ACoP and
guidance on the harmonisation of the SRSC Regulations 1977 and the Health
and Safety (Consultation with Employees) Regulations 1996, based on the
principles of the former. This was due to be published in spring 2001, but
is now scheduled for summer 2002. The HSE will also commission research
into the links between consultation and effective safety performance. The
final element of the first part is a safety adviser pilot scheme (see
below). The second, medium-term, part will examine ways of persuading
management to respond to genuine concerns that are raised by safety
representatives. The HSE will also look at enforcement initiatives and
training requirements for its inspectors.
|
Pilot
|
The HSE announced that its Worker Safety Adviser (WSA)
pilot scheme will cover the retail, hospitality, voluntary, construction
and automotive/fabrication sectors. The scheme - in which employer
participation is entirely voluntary and by prior agreement - involves
specially trained safety advisers visiting workplaces that do not have
safety representatives.2 The visits have
now started and will continue over the next six months.
|
PINs
|
In late 2001, the TUC launched a "union improvement
notice" (UIN) scheme, allowing safety reps to serve a notice on managers
who fail to heed warnings of safety failures. The scheme is a
non-statutory version of the Australian provisional improvement notices
(www.hazards.org/notices).
|
Small firms |
see also Chemicals, Construction, Stress,
Training |
Published
|
Development of an
information-based approach to self-regulation of health and safety in
small firms, HSE CRR no.330/2001, ISBN 0 7176 1990 7, £10 (Effectiveness of regulation governed by
information processing ability of small firms, claims HSE study);1 Health and safety in
small enterprises - European strategies for managing improvement,
David Walters, PIE, Peter Lang, ISBN 90 5201 952 5, Brussels-Bern.
|
Smoking |
|
Approved Code of Practice
|
The HSC recommended to ministers on 5 September 2000
the introduction of an Approved Code of Practice (ACoP) for passive
smoking at work. The Government then asked the HSC to consider further the
implications of an ACoP for the hospitality and small business sectors,
and the role that the Public Places Charter might play. The HSE has since
been reviewing evidence that has recently become available and will look
at the proposals for an ACoP in the light of this. It is also following
the progress of the Public Places Charter, but advises that work could
take some time. The HSE received 490 responses to the HSC's Proposal for an Approved Code of Practice on passive
smoking at work, CD151, free.1
Consultation closed on 29 October 1999.
|
Stress |
|
Damages guidelines
|
The Court of Appeal, for the first time, set out
guidelines for judges considering compensation claims for injuries caused
by work-related stress. The exhaustive guidelines provide clarification of
the law, but few new points. [2002]
EWCA Civ 76, CA Civil Division.
|
Guidance
|
The HSE issued guidance for managers on preventing
work-related stress. Tackling work-related stress:
a managers' guide to improving and maintaining employee health and well
being, HSG 218, ISBN 0 7176 2050 6 £7.95.1 At the same time, it issued advice for
employees but, a few months later, it withdrew and replaced this advice
following trade union criticisms. Tackling
work-related stress - a guide for employees, INDG341, free.1
|
Compensation
|
Thelma Conway, a former residential social worker with
Worcester County Council, agreed to £140,000 compensation for a
stress-related illness developed through work. The TUC's annual
compensation survey revealed that stress claims rose twelvefold to 6,428
in 2001, from 516 in 2000 (Trade unions
report twelvefold rise in stress claims).
|
Questionnaires
|
HSE-commissioned research found that commercially
available questionnaires are neither reliable nor valid stress tests. A critical review of psychosocial hazard measures,
CRR 356/2001, ISBN 0 7176 2064 6, £201 or
www.hse.gov.uk/research/content/crr/index.htm.
|
Teamworking
|
HSE-sponsored research found that teamworking can both
increase or decrease work-related stress levels. Effective teamworking: reducing the psychosocial
risks, CRR 393, ISBN 0 7176 2149 9,£15.1
|
Work design
|
The HSE published research showing the clearest links
yet between heart disease and poor work design and organisation (Researchers link psychosocial factors to
heart disease). Work environment, alcohol
consumption and ill health. The Whitehall II study, CRR 422/2002, ISBN
0 7176 2314 9, £15.1
|
Bullying
|
The Dignity at Work Bill passed its second reading in
the House of Lords on 27 March 2002. The Private Member's Bill, which
addresses harassment and bullying at work, has little chance of success
due to lack of parliamentary time.
|
Safety week
|
The European Week for Safety and Health, starting on
14 October 2002, will concentrate on psychosocial risks. The HSE was due
to issue an action pack in May to help organisations plan stress
initiatives for the week.2
|
Published
|
Mental wellbeing in the
workplace: a resource pack for management training and development
(revised 1998 edition) £25;1 Work-related stress: a short guide, free;1 Change in
manufacturing: how to manage stress-related risk, ISBN 0 7176 2086 7,
£15;1 An
intervention using a self-help guide to improve the coping behaviour of
nightshift workers and its evaluation, CRR 365/2001, ISBN 0 7176 2093
x, £15 (Nightwork advice has "negligible"
effect).1
|
Substance abuse |
|
Alcohol
|
Ongoing research into the health of 10,000 civil
servants revealed that alcohol consumption is related to sickness absence
due to injury - at moderate, binge and dependency levels (Researchers link psychosocial factors to
heart disease). Work environment, alcohol
consumption and ill health. The Whitehall II study, CRR 422/2002, ISBN
0 7176 2314 9, £15.1
|
Training |
|
Resources
|
The HSE published advice on health and safety training
for employers and trainers. The HSE hopes the publications will be
particularly useful to small firms. Health and
safety training - what you need to know, INDG 345, single copies free,
or packs of 15, £5, ISBN 0 7176 2137 5,1
and Effective health and safety training: a
trainer's resource pack, ISBN 0 7176 2109 X, £21.95.1
|
Transport - dangerous goods |
|
Exemption certificates
|
Certificate of Exemption No.2
of 2001 under Carriage of Dangerous Goods (Classification, Packaging and
Labelling) and Use of Transportable Pressure Receptacles Regulations
1996;2 Certificate of Exemption No.2 of 2001 under the
Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Rail Regulations 1996;2 Certificate of
Exemption No. 4 of 2001 under the Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road
Regulations 1996.2
|
Transport - roads |
|
Work-related driving
|
The Government's independent Work-related Road Safety
Task Group published its report on 22 November 2001. Reducing at-work road traffic incidents,1 or www.hse.gov.uk/road/noframes/index.htm (Transport: Managers will have to face
occupational road risk test). The HSC was due to consider the HSE's
proposals for taking forward the report's recommendations on 14 May 2002.
The group recommended that employers manage at-work road safety in much
the same way as they tackle workplace risks. The recommendations followed
analysis of a discussion document that had elicited just over 200 replies
(Extending safety from the workplace
onto the roads). Consultation ended on 25 May 2001. Preventing at-work road traffic incidents, DDE 16,
www.hse.gov.uk/disdocs/ or 1. HSE contact: Task Group Secretariat, HSE4, tel: 020 7717 6841, e-mail: spd.work.roadsafety@hse.gsi.gov.uk.
The group was established as a result of the Government's 10-year road
safety strategy: Tomorrow's roads: safer for
everyone, free.7
|
Transport - workplace |
see also Agriculture |
Accident prevention
|
Consultation closed on 10 May 2002 on an HSE
discussion document on Preventing workplace
transport accidents, DDE 18, free.1 The
document set out the HSE's inspection plans and sought views on seven
specific areas. It is too early to give any indication of the tenor of the
responses.
|
Competence
|
The HSE established an industry working group to help
it develop an interactive computer program to improve workplace transport
driver competence. Details: kevin.jewitt@hse.gsi.gov.uk,
tel: 0207 7176059.
|
Published
|
Improving the safety of
workers in the vicinity of mobile plant, CRR 358/2001, ISBN 0 7176
2071 9, £30;1 Investigation into the safety-related aspects of coast
control on pedestrian-operated industrial trucks, CRR 362/2001, ISBN 0
7176 2089 1, £10.1
|
Vibration |
see also Agriculture |
Directive
|
Adoption of a new vibration Directive was expected as
HSB went to press. The EU Council of Ministers adopted a common position
on 25 June 2001 on a proposed Directive that would set minimum standards
for employees exposed to mechanical vibrations. But on 30 October, it
rejected European Parliament second reading amendments to make the
proposals more stringent. The proposal underwent the conciliation
procedure, under which Council and Parliament delegations try to reach
agreement (Physical agents: Ministers
place vibration proposals on shaky ground and EU Parliament toughens vibration
values). The Directive would be the second individual physical agents
Directive (see Noise above). Proposal for a European parliament and Council
Directive on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the
exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents
(vibration), Common Position text COM(2001)26, OJ C301/26.10.2001.13
|
Violence |
|
NHS
|
The Government gave the go-ahead for NHS staff to
issue yellow warning and red no-treatment cards to patients who are
violent. www.nhs/zerotolerance/intro.htm.
|
Work equipment |
see also Legislation |
Legislation
|
The HSE warned employers and self-employed persons to
ensure that all mobile work equipment they provide complies with part III
of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER) by 5
December 2002. The equipment includes fork-lift trucks, dumpers and
tractors. Advice: Safe use of work equipment. PUWER
1998: Approved Code of Practice and guidance, L22, ISBN 0 7176 1626 6,
£8.1
|
Published
|
Packaging machinery:
safeguarding thermoform, fill and seal machines, Packaging machinery: safeguarding palletisers and
depalletisers and Packaging machinery:
safeguarding pre-formed rigid container packaging machines, Food
Information Sheets nos. 26-28, free;1 Availability, quality and standards of training for
woodworking operators and supervisors, CRR 339, ISBN 0 7176 2015 8,
£20;1 Safe working
methods with top-handled chainsaws, CRR 402/2001, ISBN 0 7176 2249 5,
£15.1
|
Working time |
|
Regulations
|
The European Court of Justice confirmed that the UK's
Working Time Regulations 1998 lawfully exclude non-mobile workers in the
transport sector. The Regulations implemented the 1993 working time
Directive. , AER European Cases, November
2001.
|
Extension
|
The fourth and final part of the European Commission's
package to extend some or all of the protection offered by the 1993
working time Directive to excluded sectors and activities has been agreed.
The Directive covers rest breaks, maximum working hours and annual leave.
The European Commission put forward its proposals in November 1989. These
cover doctors in training; road, air and inland waterway transport; sea
fishing; and seafarers. The outstanding and
most controversial measure concerned mobile workers in the road transport
sector. The text of the new Directive was agreed by a European Council and
Parliament conciliation committee on 17 December 2001, and approved by the
Parliament on 5 February 2002 and the Council on 18 February 2002. The
Directive sets a maximum average working week of 48 hours, subject to a
60-hour limit; a 30-minute rest break after six hours and a 45-minute
break after nine hours' work; and a maximum 10-hour day for night workers.
The Directive allows several derogations, but defines working time widely
to include loading and unloading, supervision, maintenance and
administration. Member states have three years in which to implement the
Directive, although self-employed drivers - the main area of dispute - are
exempt for a further four years. The Commission will draw up a report two
years before the provisions are extended to self-employed drivers, looking
at the consequences of the exclusion and tailoring the provisions to their
needs. Council Directive concerning the
organisation of working time for mobile workers performing road transport
activities and for self-employed drivers.13
|
Work-related upper-limb disorders |
see also Legislation |
Guidance
|
The HSE published revised advice on Upper-limb disorders in the workplace, HSG60
(rev), ISBN 0 7176 1978 8, £9.50 (Tackling work-related upper-limb
disorders).1
|