SUBJECT
|
PROGRESS AND COMMENTS
|
Accidents
|
see also HSC/E
|
Fatalities
|
The number of worker fatalities in 2001/02 was the second lowest recorded
under the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences
Regulation (RIDDOR). There was a small rise in the number of major injuries,
but a drop in over-three-day injuries. Health and safety: statistical
highlights 2001/02, misc 472, and Health and safety statistical
supplement 2001/02,1 or www.hse.gov.uk/statistics, free (Revitalising blank forces HSE to change
its "mindset"). Provisional figures for the following nine months, to
the end of 2002, indicate that the reporting year 2002/03 could witness
the lowest number of people killed at work on record (Deaths at work toll reaches record
low). Details: HSE,
tel: 0151 951 3864.
|
Investigation
|
The HSC decided on 3 December 2002 to reject its own
2001 proposal that employers be placed under a statutory duty to
investigate work-related injuries, ill health and dangerous occurrences.
Instead, the HSE will issue guidance later this year on incident
investigation that will include paper and software investigation tools.
The HSC took its decision in the light of an HSE paper that recommended
guidance rather than legislation. The 2001 consultation document had
proposed placing a duty on all organisations to investigate and record
RIDDOR-reportable injuries, ill health and near misses (Learning lessons from the investigation of
"accidents"). Proposals for a new duty to investigate
accidents, dangerous occurrences and diseases, free.1 The
proposals followed a 1999 HSE discussion document, to which the HSE received
684 responses, with a majority broadly in favour of a new duty.
|
Coroners
|
The final report1 from the Coroner's Review Team concluded that
"traumatic workplace deaths" should continue to be subject to automatic
public inquests, but says deaths from asbestosis and other occupational
diseases should involve a public inquest only when there is conflict or
uncertainty of evidence justifying a judicial examination (see p.5). Death
certification and investigation in England, Wales and Northern Ireland - the
report of a fundamental review 2003", www.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm58/5831/5831.htm.
|
Reporting
|
Fears about data protection forced the HSE to produce a new reporting book in
which accidents at work are recorded (see p.1). The HSE accident book,
ISBN 0 7176 2603 2, £4.75 plus VAT.1
|
Agriculture
|
see also Pesticides
|
Published
|
Farm child UK: parts 1 and 2, ISBN 0 7176 2209 6, £30;1 Safe! -
Helping children to stay safe on farms, video, £25 plus VAT (see p.7);1
Open farms, healthy children, E-coli video, www.hse.gov.uk/campaigns/killfields/ecoli.htm.
The HSE also published 34 free leaflets on working in the forestry and
arboriculture industries. The leaflets are grouped into eight
series: establishment (AFAG 100); maintenance (200); chainsaws (300); work
off the ground (400); extraction (500); processing (600); vehicles (700); and
general safety (800)1 or www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/forindex.htm.
|
Asbestos
|
|
Directive
|
The European Council adopted a Directive to tighten
the controls on asbestos at work on 18 February 2003. Regulations will
need to come into force by May 2006. Adoption followed a political
agreement on 3 June 2002, common position on 23 September 2002,
resubmission to the European Parliament (EP) for a second reading in October
2002, and agreement on a compromise text in November 2002 between the EP,
Council and Commission. Although UK law already covers much of the proposal, the
Directive would remove "reasonable practicability" from the UK's asbestos
Regulations and introduce a single exposure limit of 0.1 fibres per cm3 as an eight-hour
time-weighted average (EU proposes
cutting "reasonably practicable" from asbestos regs). The
Directive also limits the number of activities that will be exempt from its
provisions, and introduces a requirement that employers identify presumed
asbestos-containing materials before demolition and maintenance. The UK
supported the common position text. Directive of the European Parliament
and of the Council amending Council Directive 83/477/EEC on the protection of
workers from risks related to exposure to asbestos at work, OJ
L97/15.4.03.9
|
Prohibition
|
Consultation closed on 28 February 2003 on HSC
proposals to align prohibitions on the importation of asbestos with those
on its supply and use.
The HSE received less than 100 replies, most of which were positive. The
revised Regulations have been approved by the HSC and the HSE expects them to
go to Ministers by August 2003. Currently, only materials to which the
asbestos has been added deliberately are banned from supply and use in
Britain. But for imported products, the ban applies to all materials
containing asbestos, even where the asbestos constitutes a small, naturally
occurring amount. The HSC's proposals would limit the importation ban to
asbestos products where the asbestos has been intentionally added, meaning
that the prohibition on imports will be the same as the prohibition on supply
and use. The consultative document also sets out the HSE's long-term aim to
introduce a limit on the amount of asbestos permitted within a material.
First, however, the HSE will investigate whether the introduction of a limit
is feasible and useful. HSE contact: Helen Smart, tel: 020 7717 6244, email: helen.smart@hse.gsi.gov.uk. Proposal
to amend the Asbestos (Prohibition) Regulations 1992, CD 186, free.1
|
Compensation
|
The widow of a former power station worker was
awarded £4.37 million for his death from mesothelioma. The award to Lucia
Farmer is the highest made by a UK court for an industrial disease and
fatal injury. It is also notable because the four defendant companies -
Rolls Royce Industrial Power (India) Ltd, NEI Clarke Chapman Ltd and
members of the Babcock and Mitsui Babcock engineering groups - had to pay
most of the damages.
|
Published
|
The management of asbestos in non-domestic premises: reg. 4 of the CAW
Regulations 2002, L127, ISBN 0 7176 2382 3, £9.50;1 A short
guide to managing asbestos in premises, INDG223, free,1 A
comprehensive guide to managing asbestos in premises, HSG227, ISBN 0 7176
2381 5, £12.50;1 Work with asbestos insulation, asbestos
coating and asbestos insulating board, L28, fourth edition, ISBN 0 7176
2563 X, £9.50;1 Work with asbestos which does not normally
require a licence, L27, fourth edition, ISBN 0 7176 2562 1, £9.50;1
Mesothelioma factsheet, www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/causdis/occ8000.pdf
or HSE Epidemiology and Medical Statistics Unit, tel: 0151 951 3051 (see
p.3).
|
Chemicals/ Dangerous substances
|
see also Asbestos,
Major hazards
|
Chemical agents Directive
|
Regulations implementing the safety aspects of the
chemical agents Directive were laid before Parliament on 15 November 2002
(Government implements CAD
package). The Dangerous
Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002 (DSEAR) control fire
and explosion risks (SI 2002 No. 2776, ISBN 0 11 042957 5, £3.50, 3 or
www.hmso.gov.uk/si/si2002/20022776.htm,
free). They also implement the explosive atmospheres Directive (ATEX 137).
Most of the requirements came into force on 9 December 2002, but those on
explosive atmospheres came into force on 30 June 2003. The Regulations
require employers to carry out a risk assessment and eliminate or control
risks, or reduce harmful effects from fire and explosion, so far as is
reasonably practicable. The HSE insists that the Regulations do not contain
anything that is "fundamentally new" and that employers who comply with
current legislation should "notice no significant change". The Regulations
also modernise legislation dating back to 1928 on the keeping of petroleum.
The HSE will issue an Approved Code Of Practice (ACoP) and guidance later
this year. A free leaflet for small and medium-sized businesses and a DSEAR
web page can be found at: www.hse.gov.uk/spd/content/dsear.htm.
Regulatory impact assessments: Martin Davies, HSE, Safety Policy Directorate,
113 Daniel House, Trinity Road, Bootle, Merseyside, L20 7HE, tel: 0151 951
3313). The HSC issued consultative documents on the proposals for DSEAR in
February 2002; consultation closed on 20 May. The Regulations were due to
come into force in late summer 2002, but were delayed due to the large number
of responses to the condoc and some significant issues that were raised. An
overview of the consultation responses can be found in Commission Papers
HSC/02/70 (Annex 1) and HSC/02/71 at www.hse.gov.uk/foi/hsc/index.htm. The HSE revised
its Approved Codes of Practice (ACoPs) on hazardous substances and lead
(New COSHH and lead Regs
implemented). The changes
reflect the coming into force in late 2002 of the Control of Substances
Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 (COSHH) and the Control of Lead at Work
Regulations 2002 (CLAW), which implemented the health aspects of the
Directive. The COSHH ACoP incorporates the general, carcinogens and
biological agents ACoPs into a single ACoP. It also contains, for the first
time, an appendix on occupational asthma (see below). Both ACoPs explain the
application of the new hierarchy of control measures for controlling
hazardous substances and the new requirement to make arrangements to deal
with accidents, incidents and emergencies. COSHH Regulations 2002: ACoP
and guidance, L5, fourth edition, ISBN 0 7176 2534 6, £10.50, 1
and CLAW Regulations 2002: ACoP and guidance, L132, third edition,
ISBN 0 7176 2565 6, £10.50.1
|
Asthma
|
The new COSHH ACoP, which was published in late 2002 (see Chemical
agents Directive), includes an
appendix providing guidance on how employers can tackle occupational
asthma. Control of
substances that cause occupational asthma, appendix 3, COSHH ACoP and
guidance (fourth edition), L5, ISBN 0 7176 2534 6, £10.50.1
The HSC announced on 10 October 2001 that it would produce an asthma ACoP,
after analysis of 106 responses to its November 2000 consultation
document:
Proposals for reducing the incidence of occupational asthma, including an
ACoP: Control of substances that cause occupational asthma, CD 164, free
or: www.hse.gov.uk/condocs/cd164.htm. Consultation
closed on 16 February 2001. The HSE set up a new occupational asthma
website. The site will be updated regularly and new
guidance published in October on three leading causes of asthma: isocyanates
in motor vehicle repair; flour dust in craft bakeries; and wood dust in
woodworking. Website details: www.hse.gov.uk/asthma.
|
OEL reforms
|
The HSC intends issuing a consultation document in
September 2003 on major changes to the process of setting occupational
exposure limits (OELs) and for linking them to good practice (Rethinking the limits). A discussion
document issued in 2002 received 48 sets of comments. Of these, 46 agreed
with the description of the problems with the present system and were in
favour of a change to a simpler system. A clear majority voted for options 2
or 2A (linking OELs explicitly to good practice), with 2A coming in slightly
in the lead. The HSE is now in the final stages of preparing the condoc and
remains on schedule to implement changes to the framework and COSHH regime in
spring 2004. Consultation closed on 31 July 2002 on the discussion document, Occupational
Exposure Limits framework, DDE19, free.1
|
OEL changes
|
The HSE issued the 2003 supplement to EH40, the list
of Occupational Exposure Limits (OELs), on the internet. The list includes
the new and amended exposure limits approved by the HSC in April and
should be read in conjunction with the 2002 version of EH40. The HSE will
not issue a new version of EH40 this year, because the HSC is developing a
new occupational exposure limit framework (Rethinking the limits). EH40
Occupational Exposure Limits supplement 2003, www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/eh40sup.pdf,
free; paper version, ISBN 0 7176 2172 3, £3;1 2002 version and
2003 supplement, ISBN 0 7176 2083 2, £10.50. 1 The changes include
the proposals set out in CD 182: COSHH Regulations 1999: proposals for
maximum exposure limits and occupational exposure standards, free.1
The HSC proposed new maximum exposure limits (MELs) for
refractory ceramic fibres (RCFs) and subtilisins. COSHH Regulations 2002. Proposals
for new MELs, free1 or at www.hse.gov.uk/consult/. Comments
should reach Richard Pedersen, Chemicals and Flammables Policy Division, HSE4
by 1 September 2003.
|
Mutagens
|
Regulations amending the Control of Substances
Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 (COSHH) were laid before Parliament
on 7 April and came into force on 29 April 2003. The amendments require users of substances
that may cause genetic damage - classified by the European Union (EU) as
category 1 or 2 mutagens - to apply the same control measures already
required for carcinogens. The Regulations implement part of the second
amendment to the 1990 carcinogens Directive. In practice, this will only
affect the users of a substance known as triglycidyl isocyanurate (TGIC). COSHH
(Amendment) Regulations 2003, SI 2003 No. 978,3 or free
at www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/si/si2003/20030978.htm.
Consultative document: Proposals for amending the COSHH Regulations 2002,
CD184, free.1 Consultation closed on 10 January 2003.
|
IOELV Directives
|
Negotiations continue on a proposal for a second
Indicative Occupational Exposure Limit Values (IOELV) Directive. The HSC
implemented the first IOELV Directive on 31 December 2001 (Health and safety: the state of play). The Directives
establish lists of substances with agreed exposure values that member states
must take into account when setting domestic limits. The second proposal
remains under negotiation in the tripartite Luxembourg Advisory Committee's
Ad Hoc Group on Chemical Policies in the Workplace -the UK Government is represented on this
group by the HSE. The original text listed limits for 26 substances, and an
opinion on the draft Directive was adopted in May 2001 by the Luxembourg
Advisory Committee on Safety, Hygiene and Health Protection at Work (a
tripartite advisory committee of the European Commission, responsible for
discussing and agreeing opinions on any health and safety proposal put
forward by the Commission. The most recent draft of the second IOELV
Directive, which was considered by the Ad Hoc Group in November 2002, now
lists limits for 43 substances, one less than the revised EC proposal. The
group last met in spring 2003 and agreed an opinion for the Commission. It is
not yet known when member states will vote on these revised proposals,
although adoption is anticipated before the end of 2003. Details: www.hse.gov.uk/hthdir/2ioelv.htm.
|
Dangerous substances
|
The 2003 "European week for safety and health" will
focus on dangerous substances in the workplace. The HSE produced
a free action pack, comprising a newsletter, a mini CD-ROM, stickers, fact
sheets, leaflets and a poster: www.hse.gov.uk/euroweek
or tel: 0800 0850050.
|
Lead
|
The number of workers under medical surveillance for
blood-lead levels fell in 2001/02 to 15,200 - the fourth consecutive
annual decrease.
Details: www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/causdis/lead.htm.
|
Published
|
n-Propyl Bromide hazard assessment document, EH75/3, ISBN 0 7176 2350 5,
£7.50;1 Controlling fume during plastics processing,
Plastics processing sheet no.13, free;1 Working safely with
metalworking fluids, ISBN 0 7176 2561 3, £17.50;1 Cancer
risk following exposure to PAHs: a meta-analysis, RR 068, ISBN 07176 26040, £15;1 Safe use of solvent degreasing plant,
EIS40, free;1 Maintenance and cleaning of solvent degreasing
plant, EIS20 (rev1), free;1 Surface cleaning: solvent
update including the reclassification of trichloroethylene, EIS34, free;1
COSHH: a brief guide to the Regulations, INDG136 rev2, free;1 A
clean bill of health: health and safety in the dry-cleaning industry,
video, ISBN 0 7176 2166 9, £25 plus VAT; and Unloading petrol from road
tankers: Approved Code of Practice and guidance, L133, ISBN
0 7176 2197 9, £9.
|
Compensation
|
see also Insurance
|
Unions
|
Trade unions secured £305 million in personal injury compensation for 39,024
workers in 2001. Trade union trends: focus on union legal services for
injury victims, April 2003, ISBN 1 85006 673 6, TUC, £30.11 Research
carried out for the HSE found that unions are unable to supply adequate
information on industrial injury compensation claims. Analysis of
compensation claims related to health and safety issues, RR 070, ISBN 0
7176 2612, £15 or free at www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrhtm/index.htm.
|
Mining
|
The British Coal respiratory disease scheme will not
accept new applications after 31 March 2004. The scheme, along with one
for vibration, is expected to result in a total compensation bill of £6
billion.
|
Construction
|
see also Work equipment |
Revitalising
|
Almost two years after the construction industry
agreed on a significant initiative to tackle its injury and ill-health
record, HSE construction chief Kevin Myers said that "the dichotomy
between effort and results remains". Health and
safety performance in the construction industry: progress since the
February 2001 summit, second report, free (Myers finds limited solace in construction
initiative).1
In September 2002, the
HSC issued a discussion document to stimulate change in the construction
industry. Revitalising health and safety in construction,
www.hse.gov.uk/disdocs/construction.htm.
Consultation closed on 31 December 2002.
The HSE's initial analysis of almost 300 responses did not reveal
"any simple magic solutions". The HSE will publish a full
analysis of the responses and its proposed follow-up actions in summer
2003. This is likely to include a consultative document suggesting a way
forward for the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 1999 and
the Construction (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1996 (CHSW). The
HSE aims to complete that review so that any changes can be implemented at
the same time as changes to CHSW that follow from the temporary work at
height Directive, which has to be implemented by July 2004 (see Work equipment below). Responses to
condoc: www.hse.gov.uk/consult/2002.htm.
|
Health
|
The HSC decided to take the first steps in an
initiative that could see a nationwide occupational health support scheme
for the construction industry. On 27 March, the HSC's
Construction Industry Advisory Committee (CONIAC) agreed to set up an
independent forum whose first task will be to raise £1 million for the
pilot scheme, determine the most suitable provider for the pilot and
establish a project consortium. The pilot will run in a single
geographical area, and the money sought from the industry and the
government. Details: Richard Boland, HSE4,
tel: 020 7556 2100.
|
Enforcement
|
The HSE's construction division included two
additional priorities in its annual work plan for 2003/04: slips and
trips, which cause a quarter of major injuries in the industry; and
temporary traffic management standards at road works on high-speed
roads.2 The latest in a series of HSE
construction site blitzes saw HSE inspectors serve enforcement notices at
one in four sites visited in east and south east England in one week in
March. Despite this,
the HSE describes compliance as a "mixed bag" and claims there is evidence
that the industry "is raising its game".2
The HSE also carried out a nationwide blitz of construction sites
during the first two weeks of June as part of a Europe-wide inspection-led
campaign to reduce falls from height (see p.7). The blitz is backed by an
advertising campaign. Related information: Falls
from height action pack, includes Height
safe video and poster, tel: 08457 181819, free.
|
Insurance
|
A new government-backed scheme allows small building
firms in the home improvement sector to reduce their insurance premiums if
they are successfully vetted under the Contractors' Health and Safety
scheme (CHAS).
|
Designers
|
An HSE initiative found that many building designers
have little understanding of their health and safety responsibilities. Details: www.hse.gov.uk/construction.
|
Cranes
|
The deaths of three construction workers in London's
Canary Wharf in May 2000 resulted in an HSE discussion paper on tower
cranes. The HSE hopes the responses will
contribute to improved standards and guidance for tower cranes. Discussion
paper: www.hse.gov.uk/construction/index.htm.
|
Cost-benefit analysis |
see also Insurance |
Corporate Social Responsibility
|
The HSE has not yet published its promised guidance
on investment. In May 2002, the HSE announced plans to support investors
who are looking closely at health and safety performance to boost
investment opportunities. It also published research into the types of
health and safety indicators that investors want. The HSE was due to take
forward the report's recommendations and publish the results as guidance
by the end of 2002. Health and safety indicators
for institutional investors: a report to the HSE, Mark Mansley, Claros
Consulting, February 2002 (Corporate
social responsibility).2
|
Display screen equipment |
|
DSE Regulations
|
The HSE revised its guidance on the Health and Safety
(Display Screen Equipment) Regulations 1992 (How to stay healthy with DSE). New or
updated sections cover: lap-top computers; mice, trackballs and other
pointing devices; homeworking and teleworking; and choosing appropriate
software, such as programs that monitor rest pauses. It also reflects the
minor changes to the Regulations introduced in September 2002 by the
Health and Safety (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2002 (HSC changes eight sets of Regs to allay EC
criticisms). Work with
DSE, L26, ISBN 0 7176 2582 6, £8.95.1
The HSE published a practical guide to VDUs in offices. The law on VDUs: an easy guide, HSG90, ISBN 0
7176 2602 4, £8.50.1 Both publications
include a VDU workstation checklist.
|
Mice
|
HSE-commissioned research revealed that most display
screen equipment (DSE) users have not received any training or information
specific to the safe use of a computer mouse or any other non-keyboard
input devices (NKIDs). Ergonomics of using a mouse
or other NKIDs, RR 045, ISBN 0 7176 2162 6, £20.1
|
Home use
|
The HSE warned that advice given in computer
magazines to home computer owners on how to install electrostatic
sensitive components is potentially dangerous.2
|
Education |
|
Published
|
Preventing slip and trip
incidents in the education sector (Education information
sheet no.2, free).1
|
Electricity |
|
Maintenance
|
The HSE issued a warning to employers about
electrical systems maintenance procedures following a court case that
highlighted the importance of carrying out preventative maintenance. Had an "inspect
and test" been carried out by a competent electrical contractor, the
deterioration that led to the prosecution would have been identified. HSE
guidance: www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/elecindx.htm.
|
Enforcement |
see also Construction, HSC/E, Local
authorities, Manslaughter, Transport -
roads |
Fines
|
The average fine for health and safety cases in Great
Britain increased by 39% between 2000/01 and 2001/02, from £8,790 to
£12,194 (Crimes and fines
2001/2002). The rise was due to a marked increase
in penalties handed down by higher courts. Health
and safety offences and penalties 2001/2002, HSE, www.hse.gov.uk/action/content/off01-02.pdf. There
were four fines of £100,000 or more in the period covered by the table:
Nestlé, £250,000; Bison Concrete Products Ltd, £100,000; Park
Environmental Services Ltd, £250,000; RMD Qwikform LTD, £240,000. A
Private Members' bill that would stiffen the penalties for most health and
safety crimes is running out of parliamentary time. Conservative MPs
prevented debate on the Health and Safety at Work (Offences) Bill on 4
April 2003 - the fourth such intervention - and although a debate is
scheduled for 20 June, it is unlikely to be completed (New sentencing Bill could save
government's blushes). In late 2002, in , the Court of
Appeal rejected the notion that fines of £1/2 million
or more for safety breaches should be restricted to major disasters (Court of Appeal dismisses £1/2m "limit" on
fines). The idea that
there might be such a "limit" had resulted from previous Court of Appeal
judgments.
|
Safety
Bill
|
The much-touted Safety at Work Bill remains elusive.
Although it was not included in the November 2002 Queen's Speech, the
government insists that it remains committed to introducing the Bill, but
will not say when. Although the government announced the
Bill in the December 2000 Queen's Speech, it failed subsequently even to
publish a text or to include it in the 2001 Queen's Speech. Two of the
Bill's main provisions are now included in the Railways and Transport
Safety Bill, which is currently undergoing its final parliamentary stages
(see Railways and Substance
abuse below). These are the
implementation of some recommendations from Lord Cullen's review of rail
safety, and alcohol and drug use by safety-critical personnel in civil
aviation and shipping. The remaining elements of the safety Bill will
increase the penalties available to magistrates for health and safety
offences and implement recommendations from Revitalising health and safety. In particular, it
should: remove Crown Immunity from statutory enforcement; improve
standards of health and safety in the workplace; raise port and maritime
safety standards; and, if legislation is needed, set a framework for
delivery of the government's commitments on road safety (see Transport - roads - below). The
government confirmed that it still intends to remove Crown Immunity from
statutory health and safety enforcement - but only when parliamentary time
allows. Hansard, 8 May 2003, 805W.3
|
Foreign companies
|
There has been no progress on an initiative to force
companies to pay any fines and costs that are imposed in a member state
that is not their country of registration. The initiative, led by the UK,
France and Sweden, and backed by the European Parliament In early 2002,
would establish mutual recognition of legal judgements within the EU (Enforcement: Foreign firms may be forced
to pay fines). The idea was first mooted at a meeting on 1 December
2000, when the European Council on Justice and Home Affairs made progress
towards agreeing a convention. The move followed pressure from the UK
government after the HSE revealed as slender any chance that the Swedish
designers and installation contractors, Fartygsentreprenader AB and
Fartygskonstructioner AB, would pay the £1.25m fine and costs imposed
after their 1997 conviction for the Port Ramsgate walkway collapse. A similar situation exists with
the fine imposed on Geoconsult ZT GmBH of Salzburg, Austria after the
Heathrow Tunnel collapse.
|
Ergonomics |
|
Guidance
|
Union pressure forced the HSE to agree to reprint a
guidance leaflet on ergonomics just weeks after its publication. Understanding ergonomics at work, INDG90(rev2),
free at www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg90.pdf.
|
EU |
see also Asbestos, Construction, Enforcement, Working
time |
Presidency
|
The Danish and Greek Presidencies in the year from 1
July 2002 have secured: the adoption of Directives on asbestos and noise
and a Recommendation on the self employed; a common position on amending
the Seveso II Directive; and publication of a proposal for a third
physical agents Directive.
|
Self employed
|
EU Ministers adopted a non-binding Recommendation that
member states pay particular attention to the health and safety of
self-employed workers. The move is less relevant to the UK than to many
member states as UK legislation generally applies to self-employed
workers. Council Recommendation of 18 February 2003
concerning the improvement of the protection of the health and safety at
work of self-employed workers, OJ L53/28.2.2003.9
|
Explosives |
|
Legislation
|
The HSE hopes to submit revised Regulations governing
the safe manufacture and storage of explosives to the Advisory Committee
on Dangerous Substances (ACDS) later this year. The HSE is currently in
the final stages of finalising the text. Consultation closed on 10 June
2002 on the HSC's proposals, but progress has been delayed due to pressure
on HSE lawyers' time and the need to advise the government on issues
around ammonium nitrate (see Major hazards
below). The consultative document followed a major review of explosives
legislation, which recommended the replacement of the Explosives Act 1875
with new Regulations, an Approved Code of Practice and guidance. More than
100 replies were received, and they were generally supportive of the
proposals. Consultation also identified issues that require further
consideration and the final Regulations will reflect these issues.
Following the ACDS's consideration, the Regulations will go to the HSC and
then to ministers, coming into force during 2004. Proposals for new Regulations on the manufacture and
storage of explosives, CD174, www.hse.gov.uk/condocs/closed/CD174.
|
Fire |
see also MHSW Regulations 1999 |
Legislation
|
The government is still working on an Order that will
consolidate and rationalise workplace legislation on fire precautions (Prescott gives order to
fire). Although the consultation period ran from until 23 November
2002, a significant number of responses were received up until January
2003. The Department had said they would consider all responses that had
been received irrespective of the date of arrival. The Fire Safety
Advisory Board has now considered the responses, and the next stage is for
an Order to implement the reform to be laid before Parliament, in autumn
2003. It is anticipated that the Order will come into force in autumn
2004. Of the 276 responses received in response to the condoc, none were
opposed to the need to reform general fire safety law. The condoc, which
followed 10 years of delays and deliberation, proposed that the Office of
the Deputy Prime Minister use an Order under the Regulatory Reform Act "to
simplify, rationalise and consolidate" up to 120 pieces of existing fire
safety legislation. (A Bill, as primary legislation, would have to find a
major space in the always-crowded parliamentary timetable, whereas an
Order can be made far more quickly.) The Order will result in a single,
simple regime applying to all buildings that the public might use.
Importantly for health and safety professionals, the regime, insists the
government, "will be based on a modern, risk assessment approach that will
be more in line with health and safety legislation and will provide for
greater emphasis on fire prevention". The complexity of the fire safety
regimes has been the subject of a Home Office review in 1993, an
interdepartmental review in 1994 and a Home Office consultative document
in 1997 (which received 500 responses). All agreed that things had to
change. During that period, an already difficult situation was exacerbated
by the implementation of European Directives, which resulted in parallel
and sometimes conflicting fire safety regimes (Workplace legislation on fire
precautions). A Home Office working party started in 2000 to develop a
coherent regime, but responsibility for fire safety subsequently shifted
to different government departments, before ending up with the Deputy PM.
A consultation document on the reform of fire
safety legislation, www.odpm@twoten.press.net.
|
Causes
|
The most significant cause of fires in workplaces
containing flammable substances is a failure to follow HSE guidance,
according to research commissioned by the HSE. Fire
risk assessment for workplaces containing flammable substances, RR
040, £15, ISBN 0 7176 2157 X.1
|
First aid |
|
Evaluation
|
An HSE-commissioned evaluation of the UK's first aid
at work regime found generally encouraging results. But while awareness
among employers was high, compliance tended to be more in spirit than to
the letter of the law. Evaluation of the Health and
Safety (First Aid) Regulations 1981 and the AcoP and guidance, RR 069,
ISBN 0 7176 2608 3, £251 or free at www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrhtm/rr069.htm.
|
Gas |
see also Major hazards |
Review
|
The HSC is making progress through the internal stages
of the implementation of the fundamental review of gas safety. The
committee has five working groups, which have been meeting since July
2001. Consultative documents are expected in summer and October 2003. The
HSE had hoped that the Safety Bill (see above) would include a
provision for a gas levy to fund publicity and research. This idea has
been rejected and the HSE will instead be asking the major suppliers for
contributions. Gas safety review: proposals for
change, www.hse.gov.uk/spd/content/fundgas.htm. The HSE
received more than 700 responses to its 1999 discussion document. Details
on the working groups' progress: www.hse.gov.uk/gas/. The HSE amended the
nationally-accredited certification scheme (ACS) for individual gas
fitting operatives. The changes implement a recommendation of the HSC's
fundamental review of gas safety (Health and
safety: the state of play). Details: www.hse.gov.uk/gas/. Issues examined in 2000 in
regard to the Gas Safety (Management) Regulations 1996 (GSMR) are being
addressed within the fundamental review of gas safety. This is because
some outcomes of the review might also affect the 1996 Regulations,
including changes to the role of emergency service providers. The
Regulations address the security of supply of natural gas and safety
standards of emergency services provided by the gas industry. Consultation
ended on 10 December 1999 and the HSC approved the HSE's analysis of
responses on 15 August 2000. Proposals for the Gas
Safety (Management) (Amendment) Regulations 2000, CD152, free.1
|
Published
|
Control of safety risks at gas turbines used for power
generation, guidance note PM84, ISBN 0 7176 2193 6, £7;1 Control of health and
safety risks at small gas turbines used for power generation,
information document 482/7, free.2
|
Health |
see also Insurance |
Care homes
|
The HSE, Local Government Association and the National
Care Standards Commission issued a Memorandum of
understanding (MoU) that sets out their roles in the regulation of
health and safety in Britain's care homes and independent healthcare
establishments (www.hse.gov.uk/action/content/f-mou_aa.pdf).
|
Published
|
A safer place to work:
improving the management of health and safety risks to staff in NHS
Trusts, the Comptroller and Auditor General, HC 623 2002-2003, ISBN 0
1029 2142 1, £10.753 or free at www.nao.gov.uk; Safe working and the prevention of infection in
clinical laboratories and similar facilities, ISBN 0 7176 2513 3
£9.50;1 Safe working
and the prevention of infection in the mortuary and post-mortem room,
ISBN 0 7176 2293 2, £7.50.1
|
HSC/E |
see also Enforcement, Local
authorities |
Revitalising
|
Progress on the HSE's implementation of the 44 action
points from its core Revitalising health and safety
can be found throughout this table (eg Insurance below). The HSE's summary of
progress can be found at: www.hse.gov.uk/revitalising/progress/summary.htm.
Unfortunately, the HSE has not updated the progress pages since January
2003. The HSC issued its first progress report on Revitalising's 10-year targets for reducing
work-related fatalities, injuries, days off work and ill health in
Britain. The report shows that there has been no progress towards some
targets and that others cannot yet be measured (Revitalising blank forces HSE to
change its "mindset"). Health and safety
targets: how are we doing? www.hse.gov.uk/aboutus/reports. Revitalising set targets to be achieved by 2010.
These are reductions of: 30% in the number of working days lost per
100,000 workers from work-related injury and ill health; 20% in the
incidence rate of cases of work-related ill health; and 10% in the
incidence rate of fatalities and major injuries. Half of each improvement
is to be achieved by 2004/05. Related publication: A guide to measuring health and safety
performance, www.hse.gov.uk/opsunit/perfmeas.htm, free (Measuring up).
|
Securing health
together
|
The Securing health
together initiative was launched in July 2000 and represents the HSE
and government's 10-year occupational health strategy (Healthy at work, healthy for life:
HSC/E goes holistic). It has a partnership board responsible for
overseeing progress towards achieving the targets set out in the strategy.
Details are given throughout this table (see, for example, Stress below) and are available on the
strategy's website, which also has a monthly news update, the programme of
work and a best practice database: www.ohstrategy.net/. The HSE announced in June
2003 that it was scrapping the post of Chief Medical Adviser (CMA). Dr
David Snashall's five-year secondment to the HSE as part-time CMA ends on
30 June 2003. The HSE has decided not to replace him because the Securing health together initiative - on which Dr
Snashall advised - is moving into a new phase involving collaborative work
with the Department for Work and Pensions, which has its own medical
expertise.
|
Leaflets
|
HSE-commissioned research revealed that many HSE
leaflets are too difficult for much of their target audience. Effective design of workplace risk communications,
RR 093, ISBN 0 7176 2176 6, £251 or free
at: www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrhtm/index.htm.
|
Perception
|
HSE-commissioned research found that the general
public trust the HSE more than they do other government departments, even
though they have little understanding of the HSE's functions. Public perception of trust in HSE as a risk
regulator, RR 100, ISBN 0 7176 2185 5, £201 or free at: www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrhtm/index.htm.
|
Information
|
HSE-commissioned research praised the approach of the
HSE to the disclosure of information. But it pointed out that the HSC/E
will soon have to make major changes in order to comply with the Freedom
of Information Act 2000 (Freedom Act
poses new challenges for informative HSE). Audit of the HSE's openness procedures and
practices, RR 052, vols. 1,2 and 3, ISBN 0 7176 2590 7, £30 or free at
www.hse.gov.uk/research /rrhtm/rr052.htm.
|
Research
|
The HSE has published a guide to its research
priorities and activities. Strategic research
outlook (SRO) for 2003, www.hse.gsi.gov.uk/research. Paper version: simon.armitage@hse.gsi.gov.uk.
The intellectual property of research carried out for the HSE will
generally be owned by the organisations undertaking the research rather
than by the HSE, according to a new HSE policy statement (see p.8). HSE research: intellectual property policy statement
and exploitation plan, Simon Armitage, tel: 0114 289 2647 or www.hse.gov.uk/research/iprights.pdf.
|
Published
|
HSC annual report and HSC/E
accounts 2001/2002, ISBN 0 10 291822 8, £22.60,1,3 or free at www.hse.gov.uk/aboutus.reports (HSC's annual report shows steady
realisation of plan).
|
Human factors |
|
Published
|
Results from the health and
safety module of the British social attitudes survey 2001, www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/bsahs01.pdf.
|
Insurance |
see also Compensation, Construction |
NHS costs
|
The government published a Bill that will allow the
NHS to recoup the costs of treating those injured in work-related
incidents. The insurance industry is likely to pass the costs on to
employers, with public liability and employers' liability insurance
premiums expected to rise by 5%-7%. Following a second reading in the
House of Commons, the Bill started its Committee stage on 7 May 2003. The Health and Social Care (Community Health and
Standards) Bill.3 Consultation ended on
8 November 2002 on the Department of Health proposals, which came almost
three years after the Law Commission recommended the move to government.
The recovery of NHS costs in cases involving
personal injury compensation, September 2002, DoH, www.doh.gov.uk/nhscosts, email: NHSCOSTS@doh.gi.gov.uk.
|
Employers' liability
|
On 3 June 2003, two important reports affecting
employers' liability (EL) insurance were published: a review of EL
compulsory insurance by the Department for Work and Pensions; and a
broader Office of Fair Trade study into the liability insurance market
(see Safe, not sorry: EL Insurance
and Spring report for employer's
liability insurance review). The reports reflected concern that
employers were either facing significant premium hikes or were unable to
obtain cover at all. The HSE had earlier published a major report it had
commissioned on the role that insurance could have on heath and safety at
work. The report recommended the replacement of EL insurance with a
no-fault scheme. Changing business behaviour -
would bearing the true cost of poor health and safety performance make a
difference?, CRR 436/2002, ISBN 0 7176 2362 9 £20 (Making insurance costs
count).1
|
Legislation |
|
Regulations made
|
The Dangerous Substances and
Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002 (SI 2002 No. 2776); The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health
(Amendment) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003 No.978); The Notification of Installations Handling Hazardous
Substances (Amendment) Regulations 2002 (SI 2002 No.2979); The Biocidal Products (Amendment) Regulations 2003
(SI 2003 No.429); The Railways (Safety Case)
(Amendment) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003 No.579); The Working Time (Amendment) regulations 2002 (SI
2002 3128).3
|
Leisure |
|
Published
|
Health and safety in
audio-visual production - your legal duties, INDG360;1 Special or visual
effects involving explosives or pyrotechnics used in film and television
productions, Entertainment Information Sheet (EIS) no.16; Stunts, fights and other potentially hazardous
production activities, EIS no.17; Buildings
used for locations and temporary studios in film, television and
theatre, EIS no.18; Safe design and build of
production sets used for film and television,EIS no.19, all free;1
Effective safety briefings for drivers at
karting circuits, EIS no. 21, free;1 Health and safety in ski-slope operations,
INDG371, ISBN 0 7176 2598 2, free1 or
www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg371.pdf.
|
Local authorities |
see also Explosives |
Enforcement
|
The HSC warned local authorities (LAs) in January 2003
that they need to take urgent action to bolster their enforcement of
health and safety, and that the HSC would intervene where LAs fail to
perform acceptably. The warning accompanied two reports on the LA-enforced
sector: HELA annual report 2002, www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/pdf/natpic02.pdf and HELA national picture 2002, HSE LAU4 or www.hse.gov.uk/lau, free.1 The reports showed that the number of workers
killed in the service sector was half the previous year's total (Callaghan warns LAs about further
enforcement slips and Service
sector deaths fall amid crisis in enforcement).
|
Major hazards |
see also Chemicals |
Notification
|
Regulations came into force on 6 January 2003 lowering
the notification threshold of ammonium nitrate from 500 to 150 tonnes.3 The changes to the Notification of
Installations Handling Hazardous Substances Regulations 1982 (NIHHS)
follow a September 2001 explosion at the Grande Paroisse/AZF Factory in
Toulouse that showed that a major incident could be caused by a smaller
amount of ammonium nitrate than was previously thought. The changes affect
farmers, fertiliser manufacturers, importers, distributors, agricultural
suppliers, ports and docks. The Notification of
Installations Handling Hazardous Substances (Amendment) Regulations
2002 (SI 2002 No.2979).3
|
Seveso II
|
The EC Council of Ministers adopted a common position
on 20 February 2003 on a proposal to amend the Seveso II Directive
(No.96/82/EC). If agreement cannot be reached, the proposal will undergo
the Conciliation Procedure. The Seveso II Directive is implemented in the
UK through the Control of Major Accident Hazards Regulations 1999 (COMAH).
The amendment to Seveso II adds seven carcinogens to the list of
substances that trigger the Regulations and makes other changes affecting
petrol, explosives and substances dangerous to the environment. The
European Parliament was due to consider the proposal at its plenary on 18
June 2003, after which it returns to Council. The Environment Council
reached political agreement on a common position on 17 October 2002 on the
amendment as well as a change in respect of ammonium nitrate (see above).
The Economic and Social Committee adopted an opinion on 24 April (OJ
C149/21.6.2002). The European Parliament adopted its first reading opinion
on 3 July 2002, which included 47 amendments. The HSE expects it will be
two years before implementing Regulations come into force in the UK. Common position (EC) No.15/2003 with a view to the
adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council
amending Directive 96/82/EC on the control of major-accident hazards
involving dangerous substances, OJ C102/29.4.2003.9
|
Charging
|
The HSC has approved the final reports, guides and
evaluations concerning the HSE's charging regime for the gas
transportation, offshore and railway charging schemes. It had already
approved four COMAH reports (Health and
safety: the state of play). These are now available at www.hse.gov.uk/charging/index.htm.
|
Accidents
|
There were four major accidents during the year to
April 2001 at premises covered by the Control of Major Accident Hazards
Regulations 1999 (COMAH). None of the incidents resulted in serious
injury. The number of reportable accidents in 2000/01 is similar to the
average number in recent years. Using these as a "crude measure of safety
performance", the HSE expresses "concern at the magnitude and frequency of
these accidents and at the repeated underlying causes of major accidents".
The COMAH Regulations 1999 apply to 1,100 establishments that have the
potential to cause major accidents because they use or store significant
quantities of dangerous substances, such as oil products, natural gas,
chemicals and explosives. COMAH major accidents
notified to the European Commission, England, Wales and Scotland
2000-2001, www.hse.gov.uk/hid or the Environment Agency
(Anglian Region), tel: 01733 371811. A summary factsheet is also
available.
|
Conference
|
The Institute of Mechanical Engineers (IMechE) and the
HSE are running a seminar on 17 October 2003 to discuss the use of
permissioning regimes to regulate health and safety in hazardous
industries (nuclear, railways, offshore installations and major hazards
sites). Details: Kimberley Young, IMechE, tel: 0207 973 1291, email: k_young@imeche.org.uk.
|
Regulation
|
The HSC published its policy on using permissioning
regimes to regulate high hazard industries (HSC finalises permissioning
principles for major risks). Document: www.hse.gov.uk/enforce/index.htm. Consultation
closed on 6 December 2002 (www.hse.gov.uk/condocs/cl001.htm). Such regimes
make the start or continuation of work activities conditional on the
consent, licence or acceptance of a safety case or report by the safety
regulator. The condoc followed an HSE discussion document on its approach
to the regulation of the offshore, railway, chemical and nuclear
industries - all of which are based on safety cases. This closed on 28
January 2001, eliciting 70 responses. These raised numerous issues,
particularly the need for greater clarity about the HSC/E's approach to
the permissioning regimes. The HSE delayed follow-up work pending the
outcome of Lord Cullen's Ladbroke Grove Inquiry (see below). Regulating higher hazards - exploring the issues,
DDE15, www.hse.gov.uk/disdocs/dde15.htm or1.
|
Management |
|
Climate survey tool
|
HSE-commissioned research concluded that the HSE's
computer-based climate survey tool has helped organisations improve their
health and safety culture and climate. Evaluating
the effectiveness of the HSE's health and safety climate survey tool,
RR 042, ISBN 0 7176 2159 6, £101 or free at
www.hse.gov.uk/research/index.htm.
|
Leadership
|
HSE-commissioned research produced a model of
leadership factors that influence safety outcomes. The research looked at
three levels of leadership: senior managers; middle (site) managers; and
supervisors (The influence of managers).
The role of managerial leadership in determining
workplace safety outcomes, RR 044, ISBN 0 7176 2609 1, £151 or free at www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrhtm/index.htm.
|
MHSW Regulations |
|
Civil liability
|
There have been delays in the removal of the civil
liability exclusion from the Management of Health and Safety at Work
Regulations 1999 (MHSW) and the Fire Precautions (Workplace) Regulations
1997. Following consultation, the HSC submitted draft Regulations to the
Department for Work and Pension (DWP) in February 2003. Although scheduled
to come into effect by March 2003, the DWP delayed consideration until the
review of employers' liability insurance reported, in case the review
affected civil liability (see Insurance above).
The review reported on 3 June 2003 and Ministers are expected to consider
the draft Regulations shortly. Consultation closed on 28 March 2002 on the
HSC's proposals, which elicited 126 responses. The HSC approved the HSE's
analysis in early October 2002, without comment. Consultative proposals to amend the MHSW and the Fire
Precautions (Workplace) Regulations 1997, CD177, www.hse.gov.uk/condocs/cd177.htm (Legislation: MHSW rethink will
allow workers to sue employers).
|
Manslaughter |
|
Corporate killing
|
The Home Office announced in late May that it would
publish a timetable for introducing a new offence of corporate killing in
autumn 2003 (Blunkett bottles director's
killing liability). This does not necessarily mean, however, that the
Bill will be published this autumn. The Bill has been a long time coming.
Consultation on the proposals ended on 1 September 2000. The Home Office
received 166 responses - nearly all favoured change. Home Office Minister
Keith Bradley said in June 2001 that the government had not yet made
"final decisions" in the light of the comments received. Unresolved issues
concerned the sanctions that can be taken against individual directors,
although the Home Office's September 2002 letter indicated that individual
directors would not become liable under the new offence. Home Secretary
David Blunkett's statement in May 2003 announcing the Bill confirmed this
and the offence will be limited to organisations. The reform is a Labour
Party manifesto commitment. The new offence would avoid the problems of
securing a conviction of a company under the current law of manslaughter.
Sanctions would include (unlimited) fines and remedy orders.
Disqualification of directors (although it is provided for in existing
legislation) and imprisonment, floated at proposal stage, would not be
included in the Bill as the possibility of charging individual directors
has been excluded. Reforming the law of involuntary
manslaughter: the Government's proposals.
The HSC supports the new offence: Reforming the
law on involuntary manslaughter: the HSC's response to the Government's
proposals, free.2 The Home Office wrote
on 10 September 2002 to organisations representing industries with an
above average number of serious injuries, asking them for information by 1
November 2002 to be used in its impact assessment on the proposals. This
work is still ongoing.
|
Convictions
|
On 4 April 2003, a haulage company owner was jailed
for four years for the manslaughter of a man killed in a road accident.
Martin Graves of MJ Graves International had been grossly negligent in not
having a system for controlling drivers' hours. The lorry driver, Victor
Coates, was jailed for four years for causing death by dangerous driving.
On 27 February 2003, a director of a small family firm received a 15-month
prison sentence, suspended for two years, for the manslaughter of an
employee. John Horner of Teglgaard Hardwood UK Ltd was sentenced for the
death of Christopher Longrigg, who was crushed by stacks of timber. The
company was also convicted of manslaughter and fined £25,000. On 26
February 2002, a self-employed fairground examiner was jailed for 18
months for the manslaughter of two passengers killed on a ride. Barry
Ramsey had inspected and certified the ride just three weeks before the
fatal incident, but the jury accepted that the inspection had been grossly
inadequate. In October 2002, the Court of Appeal quashed two manslaughter
convictions imposed on a company director, replacing them with a
conviction under the HSW Act. The Court held that the trial judge's
directions on causation and gross negligence during the trial of Brian
Dean were sufficiently inadequate to make the verdict unsafe.
|
Protocol
|
The HSE published a new protocol for the investigation
of work-related deaths. Work-related deaths: a
protocol for liaison, misc 491 02/03 C120,1 or www.hse.gov.uk (under Enforcement), free.
|
Manual handling |
|
Advice
|
HSE-commissioned research produced a new set of
principles for safe manual handling that the HSE will use to revise its
guidance on the issue. Principles of manual
handling: achieving a consensus, RR 097, ISBN 0 7176 2179 0, £20.1
|
Roll containers
|
HSE-commissioned research produced recommendations
that should help reduce the number of injuries caused by roll containers
(Keep on rolling - safely). Safety of roll containers, RR09, ISBN 0 7176 2535
4, £15,1 or free at www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr009.pdf.
|
Musculoskeletal disorders |
see also Display screen equipment |
SMEs
|
The HSE commissioned research into attitudes in small
and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) towards musculoskeletal disorders.
Contact: Zara Whysall, tel: 01509 228481, email: Z.J.Whysall@lboro.ac.uk.
Project details: www.nottingham.ac.uk/I-WHO.
|
Published
|
Caring for cleaners: guidance
and case studies on how to prevent musculoskeletal disorders, HSG234,
ISBN 0 7176 2682 2, £9.50.1
|
Noise |
|
Directive
|
EU Ministers adopted a new noise Directive in February
2003. Implementation in the UK will result in the replacement of the Noise
at Work Regulations 1989 and significantly reduce the sound pressure
levels that are deemed to be without risk to workers' health (New noise Directive will halve
sound pressure levels). The HSE hopes to issue a consultative document
in March 2004, with new Regulations expected to come into force in
February 2006. The Directive, which underwent the conciliation procedure,
replaces the 1986 noise Directive. The HSE reports that it secured
significant improvements to the original proposal, although it was unable
to achieve either of its two initial aims. The 1989 Regulations require
employers to carry out a specific risk assessment if employees are likely
to be exposed to a daily noise level greater than 85 decibels (dB(A)) -
"the first action level". If daily exposure is likely to exceed 90 dB(A)
or peak sound pressure is likely to exceed 200 Pascals (Pa) - "the second
action level" - employers must introduce control measures, other than
hearing protection. Employers must also provide hearing protection. The
new Directive reduces the first and second action levels to 80 dB(A)/112
Pa and 85 dB(A)/140 Pa. This is a significant reduction. The exposure
action values take no account of the effect of any hearing protection
worn; they are ambient noise levels. The new Directive also introduces a
maximum daily exposure limit of 87 dB(A). Directive
2003/10/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 February on
the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of
workers to the risks arising from physical agents (noise), OJ
L42/15.2.03. A common position was adopted at the end of October 2001. The
Directive stems from a 1993 proposal for a single physical agents
Directive covering noise, vibration and non-ionising electromagnetic
radiation (see Physical agents and
Vibration below). This made little
progress, and the Commission decided to proceed with each area separately.
The employers' organisation, UNICE, says that it can see no justification
for more stringent rules in this area (www.unice.org/unice/docum.nsf/).
|
Hearing protection
|
HSE-commissioned research has produced a better
understanding of how to influence workers to wear hearing protection. Behavioural studies of people's attitudes to wearing
hearing protection and how these might be changed, RR 028, ISBN 0 7176
2155 3, £201 or free at www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrhtm/index.htm.
|
Nuclear |
see also Major hazards |
Environment
|
A report published by the HSE highlights a "lack of
clarity and potential conflict" in the different approaches to regulating
nuclear safety and environmental protection. Review
of the regulation of nuclear safety and the management of radioactive
materials and radioactive waste within the UK: structures and principles
of the regulation of civil nuclear licensed sites, NuSAC Secretariat,
5th Floor, North Wing, HSE4, free.
|
Decommissioning
|
The HSE is satisfied that the strategy of the United
Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) for the decommissioning of its
nuclear-licensed sites is "generally appropriate". The HSE will review the
situation in five years' time. The main UKAEA sites are Dounreay,
Windscale, Harwell and Winfrith. UKAEA's strategy
for the decommissioning of its nuclear licensed sites: a review by HM
Nuclear Installations Inspectorate,5 or
email: nsd.infocentre@hse.gsi.gov.uk,
or www.hse.gov.uk/nsd/nuc20.pdf.
|
Incidents
|
There were three nuclear incidents at nuclear
installations in Britain during the last six months of 2002. The incidents
were at British Energy's Torness power station and at the Dounreay and
Harwell sites, both operated by the United Kingdom Atomic Energy
Authority. Statement of nuclear incidents at
nuclear installations: third quarter and fourth quarter 2002.5
|
Offshore |
see also Major hazards |
Injuries
|
HSE provisional statistics show that there were 230
workers injured offshore in 2001/02 - three fewer than in 2000/01. Over
the same period, the number of major injuries rose by two to 55,
over-three-day injuries fell by five to 172, dangerous occurrences
(non-injury incidents) fell by 93 to 671, reported cases of ill health
fell by six to 14, and the offshore workforce fell by 124 to 23,206. Offshore injury, ill health and incident statistics
report 2001/2002 (Provisional data), HID Statistics Report, HSR 2002
001,7 or www.hse.gov.uk/hid/osd/hsr1002/index.htm, free.
|
Hydrocarbon releases
|
The number of offshore hydrocarbon releases reported
to the HSE in 2001/02 was 11% less than the previous year. Of the 241
incidents, only four were "major" - half the 2000/01 total - and 109 were
"significant" - 17 down on the previous year. Offshore hydrocarbon releases statistics 2002, HID
statistics report HSR 2002 002,7 or www.hse.gov.uk/hid/osd/hsr2002/index.htm, free.
|
Participation and Partnership |
see also Management |
Partnership Fund
|
Employers, employees and trade unions have until 31
July 2003 to bid for up to £50,000 from the Partnership Fund. Run by the
Department of Trade and Industry, the fund has given several previous
awards to health and safety initiatives. Details: enquiries.partnershipfund@uk.pwcglobal.co.
|
PPE |
|
Review
|
The HSE is reviewing the Personal Protective Equipment
at Work Regulations 1992. The first stage of the evaluation, which ended
on 30 May 2003, involved employers and safety representatives completing a
downloadable questionnaire. The Directive requires member states to review
the Regulations after five and 10 years. Questionnaire: www.hse.gov.uk/spd/pdf/question.pdf; printed
versions: Colin Dunn, tel: 020 7717 6623.
|
Dust masks
|
The HSE called for the "voluntary withdrawal" from
sale of nuisance dust masks and their replacement with approved CE-marked
disposable respirators (HSE dusts
down employer use of masks).
|
Product Directive
|
The European Commission is in the early stages of a
major review of the 1989 Directive. The review is looking at clarifying
the scope and making it easier to understand. The Department of Trade and
Industry sought comments on the Commission's working text. Consultation
closed on 21 September 2002 and the DTI will be using the responses to
inform a reply to the Commission's imminent cost-benefit analysis of the
proposal. The Commission is expected to present a finalised proposal to
the European Council and Parliament in early 2004. Working paper - draft text for a proposal to amend
Directive 89/686/EEC, www.dti.gov.uk/strd/.
|
Pesticides |
see also Agriculture |
Biocides
|
The Biocidal Products (Amendment) Regulations 2003 (SI
2003 No.429) came into force on 1 April.3
The Regulations introduce the biocides general industry charge, which is
additional to the fee for the processing of product authorisations.
Details: HSE Biocides and Pesticides Unit, tel: 0151 951 3535, email: biocides@hse.gsi.gov.uk.
|
Physical agents |
|
Directives
|
In 1993, the European Commission issued a proposal for
a physical agents Directive covering four areas. The proposal failed to
make progress, and the Commission decided to pursue the matter via four
separate Directives; those on noise and vibration have been adopted (see
Noise and Vibration). On 17 December 2002, the
Danish presidency of the EU published a proposal on electromagnetic fields
and waves, based on risk assessment, exposure control, health surveillance
and the provision on information, instruction and training. The HSE says
that the Directive is based on the values incorporated in the occupational
exposure guidelines issued by the International Commission on Non-ionising
Radiation Protection, which are broadly in line with those of the NRPB.
Meetings have taken place in the European Council Social Questions Working
Group, but genuine progress is not expected before the Italians assume the
EU Presidency for the second half of 2003. A proposal on optical radiation
will follow, but not until late 2003 at the earliest.
|
Railways |
see also Major hazards |
Railways Bill
|
The Railways and Transport Safety Bill completed its
House of Commons stages on 31 March 2003. The House of Lords' committee
stage finished on 5 June 2003, with the report debate scheduled for 19
June 2003. The Bill would create a new independent body, the Rail Accident
Investigation Branch (RAIB), to investigate serious rail accidents. On 16
April 2003, Carolyn Griffiths was appointed as chief inspector of the
RAIB.
|
Cullen Part
2
|
On 1 April, the Rail Regulator announced the
establishment of a new body responsible for railway safety. The Rail
Safety and Standards Board (RSSB) will produce the industry's collective
health and safety plan, monitor and review its health and safety
performance and manage the industry's process for setting safety
standards. The body was recommended by Lord Cullen in Part 2 of the Ladbroke Grove Inquiry Report.
Details: www.rail-reg.gov.uk/. The
Railways (Safety Case) (Amendment) Regulations 2003 came into force on
1 April (SI 2003 No.579)3 (Health and safety: the state of
play). The changes affect duties imposed on Network Rail and other
infrastructure controllers. The Regulations, which were laid before
Parliament on 10 March, implement recommendations made in Cullen Part 2
and paved the way for the creation of the Rail Safety and Standards Board.
Revised guidance: Railway (Safety Case) Regulations
2000 including 2003 amendments, L52 (rev), ISBN 0 7176 2186 3.1 Inquiries: michael.madeley@hse.gsi.gov.uk.
Consultation paper www.hse.gov.uk/condocs/condocs/rsc00-a.pdf.
|
Inquiries
|
The HSC published a report on 28 November 2002 that
brings together the responses of the rail industry to the 295
recommendations made by Professor John Uff and Lord Cullen in their
reports on the Southall and Ladbroke Grove rail crashes and their joint
inquiry into train protection systems. HSC chair Bill Callaghan said that
there were "promising signs: the industry is now tackling some
longstanding issues". The rail public inquiries:
HSC report on overall progress as of July 2002 on all recommendations from
the rail public inquiries, www.hse.gov.uk/railway/railpublic.pdf.
|
Train protection systems
|
The government accepted the HSC's advice on the
implementation of the train safety device, European Rail Traffic
Management System (ERTMS) on Britain's railways. ERTMS is an advanced
train control system that also provides Automatic Train Protection
(ATP). It was recommended by the March 2001
Cullen/Uff report, Joint Inquiry into Train
Protection Systems. Transport secretary Alistair Darling asked the
Strategic Rail Authority to develop a single programme for ERTMS
development. In the meantime, the government expects the installation of
the Train Protection and Warning System (TPWS) to be completed by the end
of the year. The HSC reached its decision after considering three
independent reports on the rail industry's proposals to introduce ERTMS
(Health and safety: the state of
play). www.hse.gov.uk/railway/rihome.htm#further (go to
"train protection systems"). Further details: www.hse.gov.uk/railway/ or www.dft.gov.uk.
|
Critical workers
|
The HSE chose the Business Strategy Group as
consultants to evaluate the efficacy of the Railways (Safety Critical
Work) Regulations 1994. The results were due in March 2003 and will be
used in the HSE's five-yearly review of the Regulations. The review will
also help implement recommendations made by Lord Cullen's part 2 report on
the Ladbroke Grove Rail Inquiry. HSE contact: Dean Munson, tel: 020 7717
6791, email: dean.munson@hse.gsi.gov.uk.
|
Incidents
|
The year to 31 March 2002 saw an "overall" improvement
in the railway's safety record, according to the HSE's annual report on
the sector. Railway safety: HSE's annual report on
the safety record of the railways in Great Britain, ISBN 0 7176 2584
2, £17.95.1
|
Southall East
|
The latest update report on the HSE's investigation
into a derailment at Southall East, London on 24 November 2002, blames a
wheel striking a broken fishplate. The derailment involved a First Great
Western train travelling from Swansea to Paddington at 125 mph. A
subsequent national survey by Network Rail found no similar failures
elsewhere. Update details: www.hse.gov.uk/railways/southalleast/index.htm.
|
Information
|
The HSE revamped its rail safety web pages at www.hse.gov.uk/railways. The pages cover rail
safety guidance, the work of the HSE, investigations, public inquiry
reports. Comments on the pages should be emailed to: Railway.Correspondence@hse.gsi.gov.uk.
|
Safety cases
|
The HSE has commissioned new research to evaluate the
impact of the Railways (Safety Case) Regulations. The findings should be
reported to the HSE by October and will inform a wider review, which aims
to produce revised Regulations by early 2005. Comments should be emailed
to: amanda.stevens@hse.gsi.gov.uk.
|
Potters Bar
|
The HSE's investigation into the Potters Bar rail
accident concluded that the crash occurred when poorly maintained and
badly adjusted points failed. No evidence to date supports speculation
that sabotage or deliberate unauthorised interference was the direct or
root cause of the derailment. Train derailment at Potters Bar, 10 May 2002: a
progress report by the HSE Investigation Board, www.hse.gov.uk/railways/pottersbar.htm, free.
|
Tube
|
The latest information on the HSE's investigation into
the train derailment at Chancery Lane station on 25 January 2003 can be
found at: www.hse.gov.uk. The HSE says that the initial
indications are that the derailment of the Central Line train was caused
by a traction motor falling on to the track from beneath the fifth
carriage of the train.
|
Risk |
|
Published
|
Taking account of societal
concerns about risk: framing the problem, RR 035, ISBN 0 7176 2153
7;1 and Understanding and responding to societal concerns,
RR 034 ISBN 0 7176 2154 5, £15.1
|
Safety reps |
|
Review
|
There have been further delays in the HSE's
publication of its consultative document on the harmonisation of
Regulations on employee consultation and participation on health and
safety issues. The HSC briefly discussed the issue in May 2003 and agreed
that it would considerthe consultative document on 15 July 2003. Subject
to HSC approval, the HSE will publish the document, allowing 4-6 months
for consultation. The document, which is currently in draft form, proposes
an employee-total threshold below which the new Regulations would not
apply. The document is also likely to cover the workers' safety adviser
pilot scheme (see below) and non-legislative proposals. The HSC had
earlier confirmed that it is to replace the Safety Representative and
Safety Committees Regulations 1977, as part of a two-part strategy to
improve employers' consultation with workers (HSC confirms repeal of safety reps
Regs). The strategy follows the HSE's analysis of 850 responses to a
1999 discussion document (DDE12). The condoc was originally due to be
published in spring 2001. In the medium-term, the HSE will examine ways of
persuading management to respond to genuine concerns that are raised by
safety representatives. The HSE will also look at enforcement initiatives
and training requirements for its inspectors.
|
Pilot
|
The HSC said the Workers Safety Advisers (WSAs) pilot
scheme has been "very successful", particularly for smaller companies. The
pilot saw the WSAs (also known as "roving safety reps") visit mainly
workplaces that do not recognise unions, and advise employees and
employers on how to consult on health and safety and secure improvements.
The scheme ran from February to November 2002 in nine areas and covers the
retail, hospitality, voluntary, construction and automotive/fabrication
sectors. The preliminary findings were revealed in April; the HSE hopes to
publish the full review by York Consulting in summer 2003.
|
Published
|
Worker participation in health
and safety: a review of Australian provisions for worker health and safety
representation, www.hse.gov.uk/workers/content/pinreport.pdf, free
(The potential of PINS).
|
Small firms |
|
Management
|
The HSE produced health and safety tools for three
management best practice programmes run by the Small Business Service
(SBS). The tools are aimed at business advisers and their clients.
Details: www.connectbestpractice.com/; www.benchmarkindex.com/; and www.iuke.co.uk/.
|
Mentoring
|
The HSE launched a free mentoring service for small
firms in the textile and footwear manufacturing industries. The service
includes an HSE mentor, who will visit the company by appointment to help
carry out a sample audit. Participation is voluntary, but companies taking
part will be exempt from the HSE's round of formal inspections. Initially,
the scheme is limited to 20 companies with 50 or fewer employees. Details:
Ian Cook, tel: 0113 283 4251, e-mail ian.cook@hse.gsi.gov.uk.
|
Published
|
Published: Aching arms (or RSI)
in small businesses, INDG171(rev1), ISBN 0
7176 2600 8, free; An introduction to health and
safety (INDG259 rev1)1.
|
Smoking |
|
ACoP
|
The government continues to dampen any hope of action
on passive smoking at work. In March 2003, it stated that it had no plans
either to review legislation on worker safety dealing with the effects of
passive smoking or to introduce a levy on employers who continue to permit
smoking. There has been no progress on the introduction of an Approved
Code of Practice (ACoP) for passive smoking at work. The HSC recommended
an ACoP to ministers on 5 September 2000. The government then asked the
HSC to consider further the implications of an ACoP for the hospitality
and small business sectors, and the role that the Public Places Charter
might play. The HSE has since been reviewing evidence that has recently
become available and will look at the proposals for an ACoP in the light
of this. It is also following the progress of the Public Places Charter,
but advises that work could take some time. The HSE received 490 responses
to the HSC's Proposal for an Approved Code of
Practice on passive smoking at work, CD151, free.1 Consultation closed on 29 October 1999. An
Office of National Statistics survey found a small rise in the percentage
of workers reporting that smoking is not allowed at their work premises
(41% in 2001, from 44% in 2000). Smoking-related
behaviour and attitudes, National Statistics, tel: 020 7533 5702, ISBN
1 85774 503 5, free.
|
Effects
|
A report from Action on Smoking and Health (ASH)
claimed that passive smoking at work kills three people every day. A killer on the loose, April 2003, ASH, tel: 020
7739 5902.
|
Stress |
|
Standards
|
HSE-commissioned research concluded that it is still
not possible to produce definitive information about how workplace
stressors affect workers. The research will inform the HSE's development
of good management practices and standards. Review
of existing supporting scientific knowledge to underpin standards of good
practice for work-related stress - phase 1, RR 024, ISBN 0 7176 2568
0, £251 or free at www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrhtm/index.htm. The HSE confirmed on 15 May 2002 that it will
pilot the first phase of its stress management standards in 2003, with a
final phase in 2005. It hopes the standards will provide a clear yardstick
against which to measure an employer's management of stress.
|
Medication
|
HSE-commissioned research found that anxiety,
depression and related medication affect work performance. Effects of prescribed medication on performance in the
working population, RR 057, ISBN 0 7176 2595 8, £20.1
|
Heat
|
HSE-commissioned research resulted in a successful
pilot of a simple risk assessment for managing stress caused by heat in
the workplace. The development of a practical heat
stress assessment methodology for use in UK industry, RR 008, ISBN 0
7176 2533 8, £251 or free at www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrhtm/index.htm.
|
Substance abuse |
see also Stress |
Policies
|
A Chartered Management Institute survey found that
fewer than one in two organisations have a policy on drugs and alcohol. Managing the effects of drugs and alcohol in the
workplace, tel: 020 7421 2704. The TUC claimed that 43% of
organisations still do not have a drug and alcohol policy. Alcohol and work: a potent cocktail, www.tuc.org.uk/h.
|
Transport Bill
|
The Railways and Transport Safety Bill was due to have
its "Report" debate in the House of Lords on 9 June 2003 (see also Railways above). The Bill addresses
alcohol and drug abuse by people who work on ships, air flight crew and
air traffic controller.
|
Testing
|
The Joseph Rowntree Foundation is funding an
"Independent inquiry into drug testing at work", email: yolandeb@drugscope.org.uk,
tel: 020 7922 8612.
|
Transport - dangerous goods |
|
Consolidation
|
The HSC proposed on 3 June 2003 to simplify and
consolidate into one set of Regulations the 14 separate pieces of
legislation on the carriage of dangerous goods by road and rail (see p.8).
The Regulations would implement two European Directives on the carriage of
dangerous goods by rail and road (the RID and ADR framework Directives)
and the outstanding provisions of the Transportable Pressure Equipment
Directive (TPED) (Commission Directives 2003/28/EC and 2003/29/EC and
Council Directive 1999/36/EC). Consultation closes on 2 September 2003,
and the HSE hopes the new Regulations will come into force by spring 2004.
Proposals for the Carriage of Dangerous Goods and
Use of Transportable Pressure Equipment Regulations,1 or www.hse.gov.uk/consult/live.htm. The HSC had
earlier confirmed that it would not meet its target date for
implementation and consolidation. Instead, it published a consultative
letter on 21 February 2003 proposing a short set of amending Regulations
that would defer until 2004 the expiry date of 1 July 2003 under current
laws governing the construction, inspection, testing and use of pressure
receptacles and tanks. The HSC attributes the delay to the "continuing
complexity of the task of drafting the consolidated Regulations".
Consultative letter: www.hse.gov.uk/consult; comments to: cdgpolicy.spda@hse.gsi.gov.uk
or Transport of Dangerous Goods Unit, HSE4,
tel: 020 7717 6859.
|
Transport - roads |
|
Work-related driving
|
The HSC accepted - fully or partially - 15 of the 18
recommendations of the report of the government's Work-related Road Safety
Task Force (HSC heads for the highway).
The report recommended that employers manage at-work road safety in much
the same way as they tackle workplace risks. The HSC sent its response to
the report to ministers on 29 May 2002. The HSC/E have now agreed plans
with the DfT to progress the report's recommendations. The HSE's programme
will concentrate on: working with industry to develop and promote best
practice; awareness raising; intelligence and data collection; clarifying
investigation and enforcement arrangements between the police, the HSE and
local authorities; research; and guidance. The HSE is making progress with
implementation. It is also to issue general guidance for employers by late
summer 2003, and a policy statement on work-related road safety to clarify
employers' duties. At this stage, the HSE does not envisage changes to its
enforcement priorities, which have been outlined in the published
enforcement policy statement. These will be reviewed in 2004. The task
group's report was published on 22 November 2001. Reducing at-work road traffic incidents,1 or www.hse.gov.uk/road/noframes/index.htm (Transport: Managers will have to
face occupational road risk test). The recommendations followed
analysis of a discussion document that had elicited just over 200 replies
(Extending safety from the
workplace onto the roads). Consultation ended on 25 May 2001. Preventing at-work road traffic incidents, DDE16,
www.hse.gov.uk/disdocs/ or1. HSE contact:
Task Group Secretariat, HSE4, tel: 020 7717
6841, email: spd.work.roadsafety@hse.gsi.gov.uk.
The group was established as a result of the government's 10-year road
safety strategy: Tomorrow's roads: safer for
everyone, free.7
|
Death sentences
|
On 3 April 2003, the Court of Appeal approved new
guidelines for sentencing drivers who cause death by dangerous driving.
The guidelines, which were drawn up by the Sentencing Advisory Panel,
include a minimum sentence of two years if the driver was using a mobile
phone or suffering from sleep deprivation. The
panel's advice to the Court of Appeal, causing death by dangerous
driving, www.sentencing-advisory-panel.gov.uk/.
|
Mobile phones
|
The Department for Transport says it is "getting close
to drawing a conclusion" on its proposal for an offence that would
prohibit the use of any hand-held mobile phone or similar device by
drivers (Mobiles on the move).
Consultation closed on 25 November 2002 on the proposals, which elicited
more than 1,000 replies. The DfT has intended introducing the legislation
in early 2003, but there has been slippage in the timetable. Mobile phones and driving - proposal for an offence of
using a hand-held mobile phone while driving, 20 August 2002, www.roads.dft.gov.uk/roadsafety.
|
Transport - workplace |
|
Accident prevention
|
Research carried out for the HSE by the Transport
Research Laboratory concluded that the integration of workplace transport
into a recognised safety management system would improve safety levels.
The researchers produced a model system (Tackling workplace transport: a long haul
in a small space). Review of workplace control
measures to reduce risks arising from the movement of vehicles: phases 1
and 2, RR38, ISBN 0 7176 2581 8, £251
or free at www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrhtm /rr038.htm. The
research is part of the activities around the inclusion of workplace
transport as one of the HSC's eight priorities for 2001/04. The HSE claims
it is too early to comment on its enforcement programme under the plan,
other than that the number of inspections was well in excess of the total
planned. Consultation closed on 10 May 2002 on a discussion document on
improving workplace transport. This found that employers want more
specific, clearer and accessible guidance (Industry reveals how to cut workplace
transport risks). The document set out the HSE's inspection plans and
sought views on seven specific areas. Preventing
workplace transport accidents, DDE18, free (Transport: Third time lucky for HSE
workplace transport plans?).1 The HSE
says that its analysis of the discussion document responses and the TRL
research led it to start a review in January 2003 of its guidance on
workplace transport. It anticipates that the new guidance and a dedicated
website will be available by the end of 2003.
|
Vibration |
|
Directive
|
EU ministers adopted a Directive on 21 May 2002 that
sets minimum standards for employees exposed to mechanical vibrations (OJ
L177/6.7.02, http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/oj/2002/l_17720020706en.html).
The Directive is the second individual physical agents Directive (see Noise and Physical
agents above). The HSE will publish a condoc in August 2003, with
the Regulations due to be laid in Parliament in December 2004, coming into
force on 6 July 2005. Interim comments can be sent to Brain Coles, HSE
Health Directorate4, tel: 020 7717 6893,
email: brian.coles@hse.gsi.gov.uk.
Directive details. Progress details (Physical agents: Ministers place vibration
proposals on shaky ground and EU
Parliament toughens vibration values).
|
Women |
|
Published
|
New and expectant mothers at
work - a guide for employers, HSG122, ISBN 07176 2583 4, £9.50 (HSE delivers revised guidance for
assessing pregnancy-related risk);1 New and expectant mothers who work - a guide for
health professionals and A guide for new and
expectant mothers who work - a guide for employees, available free at
www.hse.gov.uk/.
|
Work equipment |
|
PUWER
|
Part III of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment
Regulations 1998 (PUWER 98) came fully into effect on 5 December 2002.
Although new mobile equipment had been covered since 1998, the Regulations
gave equipment in use before 1998 a four-year transitional period. Mobile
equipment includes forklift trucks, dumper trucks and tractors. HSE
advice: Safe use of work equipment: Provision and
Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998: Approved Code of Practice and
guidance, L22, ISBN 0 7176 1626 6, £8.1
|
Training
|
The HSE warned employers and the self-employed that
they must not allow people to operate plant or equipment unless they are
competent to do so. In particular, they must have adequate arrangements
for complying with training requirements imposed by health and safety
legislation. Part of these arrangements should involve checks to ascertain
the validity of training certificates or plant licences. The HSE's warning
follows an investigation in south-east England that discovered malpractice
by a plant trainer that operates throughout the UK. As a result, the HSE
served Prohibition Notices on David Harris and his company, Future
International Training Ltd. Local HSE offices can advise employers about
training and competence (details: www.hse.gov.uk).
|
Directive
|
On 27 June 2001, the European Council adopted a
Directive to reduce the risks of falls from height. Implementation is
required three years after adoption. The HSC intends to implement the
Directive in Great Britain through a single set of new Regulations
covering all industry sectors. The HSE had aimed to publish a consultative
document with draft Work at Height Regulations and guidance in April 2003;
this is now expected mid- to late-summer. The HSE reports much informal
activity, including discussions with industry representatives on how it
might implement the Directive. Ministers adopted a common position on the
Directive on 23 March 2001. The European Parliament had given a successful
first reading to the proposal on 21 September 2000 and a second reading on
14 June 2001, and Ministers had reached political agreement on 17 October
2000. The European Commission published a revised proposal in February
2001 (OJ C62/27.2.01). Directive 2001/45/EC of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 amending Council
Directive 89/655/EEC concerning the minimum health and safety requirements
for the use of work equipment by workers at work (second individual
Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC)
,OJ L195/19.7.2001. Details: http://intranet/management/hsc_meetings/2001/papers/c182.htm.
HSE contact: David King, tel: 020 7717 6349, or email: David.King@hse.gsi.gov.uk.
The HSE launched a pilot project aimed at reducing injuries due to falls
from height. The HSE says that electrical and maintenance fitters are
particularly at risk, and the most common agent involved in falls among
both groups is ladders. Details: www.hse.gov.uk.
|
Working time |
|
Directive
|
Following consultation, the Department of Trade and
Industry is "revisiting" its proposals to extend aspects of the working
time Directive to workers who are currently excluded from its provisions.
Consultation closed on 31 January 2003. The proposals, which were
published on 31 October 2002, would provide 770,000 workers with statutory
rest breaks, limits on their working day and week, and paid annual leave.
Beneficiaries include junior doctors and workers in the road, rail, air,
sea, inland waterways, seafishing and offshore sectors. The government
confirmed that transport workers would be covered by the Directive from 1
August 2003 (Hansard, 2 April 2003, 705 WA).3 Measures to implement
Directive 2000/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
amending Council Directive 93/104/EC concerning certain aspects of the
organisation of working time to cover sectors and activities excluded from
that Directive, URN 02/1424, DTI publications orderline, tel: 0845
6000 925, free or DTI website: www.dti.gov.uk/er/work_time_regs/hadconsult.htm.
The Department of Transport is consulting separately on mobile workers in
the aviation sector.
|
Workplace |
|
Toilet breaks
|
The TUC called on employers to ensure that workers can
take toilet breaks whenever necessary, without loss of pay. Gotta go campaign details: www.hazards.org/toiletbreaks.
|
Directive
|
The HSE is reviewing the Workplace (Health, Safety and
Welfare) Regulations 1992. The first stage of the evaluation, which ended
on 30 May 2003, involved employers and safety representatives completing a
downloadable questionnaire. The Directives require member states to review
the Regulations after five and 10 years. Questionnaire: www.hse.gov.uk/spd/pdf/question.pdf; printed
versions: Colin Dunn, tel: 020 7717 6623.
|
Young workers |
|
Working hours
|
Regulations came into force on 6 April 2003 further
limiting the working time of workers between the school minimum leaving
age and aged 18. The 12-week consultation started on 14 June 2002 and
would limit working time to 40 hours a week and eight hours a day, and
would prohibit night working between 10pm and 6am or 11pm and 7am. Some
sectors and activities are exempt from the night restrictions, including
hospitals, bakeries, and post and newspaper deliveries. The move is
necessary because the UK's opt-out from the provisions ended on 22 June
2000. The Working Time (Amendment) Regulations
2002 (SI 2002 No. 3128).3
|