Unfair dismissal remedies: EAT addresses limits of "Polkey" reductions
-
expand disabled
Boulton & Paul Ltd v Arnold [1994] IRLR 532 EAT (0 other reports)
-
expand disabled
Highfield Gears Ltd v James EAT/702/93 (0 other reports)
-
expand
Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd (formerly Edmund Walker (Holdings) Ltd) [1987] IRLR 503 HL (1 other report)
-
expand disabled
Steel Stockholders (Birmingham) Ltd v Kirkwood [1993] IRLR 515 EAT (0 other reports)
In a number of recent cases, the EAT has considered the approach industrial tribunals should take when considering reducing unfair dismissal compensation on the grounds that the unfairness was due only to "procedural" failures.