Case report round-up: Associative pregnancy discrimination not possible under SDA
XpertHR's latest case reports cover:
- Sex discrimination: No ability to bring claim of associative pregnancy discrimination In Kulikaoskas v Macduff Shellfish and another EATS/0062/09 & EATS/0063/09, the EAT held that an employee who claimed that he was dismissed because of his partner’s pregnancy was unable to bring a claim of associative discrimination under the Sex Discrimination Act 1975. (Employment Review)
- Tribunal procedure: Successful appeal against striking out In A v B and another [2010] EWCA Civ 1378 CA, the Court of Appeal held that a complaint of unfair dismissal and sex discrimination had a "more than fanciful" prospect of success and therefore should not have been struck out by the employment tribunal. (Employment Review)
Also
Week beginning 7 March 2011
Week beginning 28 February 2011
Week beginning 21 February 2011
Week beginning 14 February 2011
Week beginning 7 February 2011
Week beginning 31 January 2011
Week beginning 17 January 2011
Week beginning 10 January 2011
Week beginning 20 December 2010
Week beginning 13 December 2010
Week beginning 22 November
2010
Week beginning 8 November
2010
Week beginning 25 October
2010
Week beginning 11 October
2010
Week beginning 4 October
2010
Week beginning 27 September
2010
Week beginning 20 September
2010
Week beginning 13 September
2010
Week beginning 30 August
2010
Week beginning 23 August
2010
Week beginning 16 August
2010
Week beginning 9 August
2010
Week beginning 2 August
2010
Week beginning 26 July
2010
Week beginning 12 July
2010
Week beginning 5 July
2010
Archive: January to June
2010
Archive: July to December
2009
Archive: January to June
2009
Archive: July to December
2008
Archive: January to June
2008
Archive: July to December
2007
Archive: January to June
2007
Archive: July to December
2006