-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
Bess Sturman and Richard Port of Addleshaw Goddard outline the latest legal rulings and explain what you need to know to avoid tribunals.
-
- Date:
- 30 December 2005
- Type:
- Employment law cases
A review of recent significant cases on practice and procedure in the tribunals, EAT, Court of Appeal and Court of Session.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
This week's case round-up from Eversheds, covering continuity of employment.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
Zoe Balmforth and Joe Glavina of Addleshaw Goddard outline the latest legal rulings and explain what you need to know to avoid tribunals.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
Sally Logan, associate at Addleshaw Goddard, brings you a comprehensive update on the latest decisions that could affect your organisation, and provides advice on what to do about them.
-
- Date:
- 10 June 2005
- Type:
- Employment law cases
A review of recent significant cases on practice and procedure in the employment tribunals, EAT and Court of Appeal.
-
- Date:
- 13 May 2005
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Skiggs v South West Trains Ltd, the EAT holds that the employment tribunal was entitled to hold, on the facts, that an investigative meeting concerning a grievance about an employee who had previously been disciplined was not a disciplinary hearing for the purpose of s.10 of the Employment Relations Act 1999.
-
- Date:
- 25 March 2005
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Voith Turbo Ltd v Stowe, the EAT holds that, applying the principles established in Norton Tool Co Ltd v Tewson, the tribunal was entitled to find that an unfairly dismissed employee did not have to give credit for earnings achieved during the period covered by notice pay made by his former employer.
-
- Date:
- 26 November 2004
- Type:
- Employment law cases
A review of recent significant cases on practice and procedure in the employment tribunals, EAT and Court of Appeal.
-
- Date:
- 12 November 2004
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Scott v Commissioners of Inland Revenue the Court of Appeal holds that an employment tribunal erred in awarding only £15,000 in respect of the psychiatric injury caused to an employee by the way in which his employer dealt with allegations of sexual harassment made against him by a work colleague.