Topics

Employment tribunals and courts

New and updated

  • Type:
    Employment law cases

    Court of Appeal overturns strike out of doctor's whistleblowing claim against Health Education England

    The Court of Appeal has held that the employment tribunal incorrectly struck out the appellant's claim against Health Education England (HEE). The Court remitted the claim to a fresh tribunal to decide, as a preliminary issue, if the appellant was a worker in relation to HEE under the whistleblowing provisions of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

  • Type:
    Employment law cases

    Right to be accompanied: £2 award after employer turns down employee's chosen companion

    An employment tribunal has held that the employer breached the claimant's right to be accompanied when it refused to allow his chosen companions, trade union representatives, to accompany him at a disciplinary appeal hearing. However, it awarded compensation of £2 only, on the basis that the employer had understandable reasons for the refusal.

  • Type:
    Employment law cases

    Breach of contract: £25,000 award for apprentice whose apprenticeship ended early

    An employment tribunal has awarded £25,000 for breach of contract to an apprentice whose contract of apprenticeship, which was due to run for four years, was terminated after less than two years.

  • Type:
    Employment law cases

    Breach of contract: nominal damages for misuse of confidential information

    The High Court has held that two ex-employees breached their contracts of employment by misusing confidential information belonging to their former employer's business. However, the High Court found that the employer had not suffered any financial loss and that it was entitled to only nominal damages of £1 from each employee.

  • Type:
    Employment law cases

    Case round-up

    Chris Cook is a partner and Keely Rushmore is a senior associate at SA Law. They round up the latest rulings.

  • Type:
    Employment law cases

    Agency workers: calculating compensation when hirer liable for breach

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has confirmed the correct approach that tribunals should follow when calculating compensation for an infringement of reg.5(1) of the Agency Workers Regulations 2010.

  • Type:
    Employment law cases

    Libel: Email stating employee dismissed for gross misconduct not libellous

    In Theedom v Nourish Trading Ltd (t/a CSP Recruitment) and another [2016] IRLR 866 HC, the High Court dismissed an employee's libel claim in respect of emails sent by his employer about his misconduct.

  • Type:
    Employment law cases

    Case round-up

    Chris Cook is partner and head of employment and Keely Rushmore is senior associate at SA Law. They round up the latest rulings.

  • Type:
    Employment law cases

    Sexual harassment award: £14,000 for injury to feelings not excessive

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld an employment tribunal decision to award £14,000 for injury to feelings after a young lawyer was subjected to sexual harassment in the workplace and forced out of her job. Zoe Lomax, employment associate at DLA Piper, examines the decision including the level of compensation dictated by the Vento bands.

  • Type:
    Employment law cases

    Sex discrimination: £28,321 award over Network Rail's policy on enhanced shared parental pay

    An employment tribunal in Scotland has awarded £28,321 to a Network Rail employee over his employer's policy of giving a period of full pay to mothers and primary adopters on shared parental leave, but paying only statutory shared parental pay to partners and secondary adopters.

About this topic

HR and legal information and guidance relating to employment tribunals and courts.