-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
The employer in this case got a review of its flexible working arrangements wrong by assuming that women's applications to retain their flexible working arrangements should be favoured over men's applications.
-
- Type:
- Quick reference
A table summarising the compensation payable for breaches of the suspension from work provisions.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
This week's case of the week, provided by DLA Piper, covers protective awards under TUPE.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
This is a rare instance, along with the decision in Barlow v Ranc Care Homes Ltd ET/1101527/10, of an employment tribunal ordering an employer to reinstate an unfairly dismissed employee.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In a decision that may appear harsh, the employment tribunal penalised the employer almost £3,000 for failing to follow the statutory right to request flexible working procedure to the letter, even though the managing director may have been distracted because he was dealing with possible redundancies at the same time.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
This week's case of the week, provided by DLA Piper, covers protective awards for collective redundancies.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
Claire Benson is managing associate and Helen Corbett, Sinead Jones, Helen Ward and Tori O'Neil are associates at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.
-
- Date:
- 7 June 2011
- Type:
- Employment law cases
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that, where there are multiple respondents and particular loss cannot be attributed to one party, employment tribunals must award compensation on a joint and several liability basis, meaning that the claimant can claim the entire amount from any respondent.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
Claire Benson is managing associate and Helen Corbett, Sinead Jones, Helen Ward and Tori O'Neil are associates at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.
-
- Date:
- 16 May 2011
- Type:
- Employment law cases
The Court of Appeal has held that the employment tribunal was wrong to assess compensation for a banker who was unfairly dismissed and suffered race discrimination on the basis that he would be unlikely to find an equivalent job again.