Topics

Sector focus

New and updated

  • Date:
    31 December 1999
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Duncanson v South Ayrshire Council

    In Duncanson v South Ayrshire Council [1999] SLT S19 CS, the Court of Session held that a steel cabinet within a nursery was work equipment for the purposes of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1992.

  • Date:
    31 December 1995
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Malcolm v Metropolitan Police Commissioners

    In Malcolm v Metropolitan Police Commissioners 1995 5 CLR 368 HC, the High Court held that the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992, regulation 5 creates an absolute statutory duty and proof that a defect in equipment had caused an accident would fix the duty holder with civil liability.

  • Date:
    31 December 1995
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Barton v Wandsworth Council

    In Barton v Wandsworth Council [1995] ET/11268/94, an employment tribunal ruled that an ambulance driver employed by the technical services division of a local authority was subjected to detriment when, in circumstances of danger that he reasonably believed to be serious and imminent, he took appropriate steps to protect himself or other persons from danger.

  • Date:
    1 November 1995
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    No liability for victimisation

    In Waters v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (14 February 1995) EOR64B, the EAT rules that an employer could not be not liable for victimising an employee who alleged that she was sexually harassed by a work colleague, where the alleged harassment was not committed in the course of employment.

  • Date:
    14 April 1992
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Allsop v North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council

    In Allsop v North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council [1992] 90 LGR 462 CA, the Court of Appeal held that payments made to employees by a local authority as compensation for redundancy under a voluntary severance scheme were unlawful as they exceeded the prescribed limits.

  • Date:
    8 March 1991
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Contracts of employment: Doctors' hours under attack

    An employer's right to require overtime from an employee who is under a contractual obligation to be "on call" for a specified number of hours in excess of his basic working week, is subject to the employer's implied duty to take reasonable care not to injure its employee's health, holds the Court of Appeal in Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority.

  • Date:
    1 February 1991
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Robb v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

    In Robb v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham [1991] IRLR 72 HC, the High Court granted an interlocutory injunction restraining the council from giving effect to the purported summary dismissal of its director of finance on disciplinary grounds - and requiring it to treat him as suspended on full pay - unless and until it had properly complied with the disciplinary procedure incorporated into his contract of employment.

  • Date:
    1 November 1988
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    MacPherson v London Borough of Lambeth

    In MacPherson v London Borough of Lambeth [1988] IRLR 470 HC, the High Court held that the refusal of the employees to operate new equipment was in breach of their contracts and the employees were not entitled to an interlocutory order directing the council to pay arrears of salary.

  • Date:
    1 May 1986
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Discriminatory retirement age

    In Marshall v Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority (26.2.86) EOR7E, the European Court of Justice rules that compulsory retirement of men and women at different ages contravenes the EEC Equal Treatment Directive.

  • Date:
    1 January 1984
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Strathclyde Regional Council v Neil

    In Strathclyde Regional Council v Neil [1984] IRLR 11 CS, the Sheriff Court held that a contractual provision for repayment by the employee of the costs incurred is not a penalty and can be enforced, provided the amount relates to the loss suffered by the employer.

About this topic

HR and legal information, news and guidance relating to specific industry sectors.