Collective redundancies - information and consultation

New and updated

• Date:

  15 April 2005

  Type:

  Employment law cases

  Collective redundancies: Consultation must precede notice of redundancy

  In Junk v Kühnel, the ECJ holds that articles 2 to 4 of Directive 98/59/EC on collective redundancies must be construed as meaning that the event constituting "redundancy" is the declaration by the employer of its intention to terminate the employees' contracts of employment.

• Type:

  FAQs

  When does a "redundancy" take place for the purposes of the EU Collective Redundancies Directive?

• Date:

  1 June 2004

  Type:

  Employment law cases

  Susie Radin v GMB

  In Susie Radin v GMB and others [2004] IRLR 400 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the employment tribunal had not erred in making a protective award for the maximum period of 90 days in respect of the employers' failure to consult with the union over a proposal to close a factory and dismiss all employees as redundant, notwithstanding the tribunal's finding in relation to the employees' claims of unfair dismissal that, in those circumstances, consultation would have been futile.

• Date:

  19 December 2003

  Type:

  Employment law cases

  Collective redundancies: "Proposal to dismiss" was made when directors approved decision

  In Dewhirst Group v GMB Trade Union, the EAT affirms that the statutory duty under UK law to consult with employee representatives in relation to collective redundancies is triggered at the point at which a "proposal" to dismiss employees is made.

• Type:

  Employment law cases

  Case round-up

  Our resident experts at Pinsents bring you a comprehensive update on all the latest decisions that could affect your organisation, and advice on what to do about them.

• Type:

  Employment law cases

  Case round-up

  Our resident experts at Pinsents bring you a comprehensive update on all the latest decisions that could affect your organisation, and advice on what to do about them.

• Date:

  15 June 2002

  Type:

  Employment law cases

  Redundancy consultation: Conflicting UK and EU rules on redundancy consultation

  In MSF v Refuge Assurance plc and United Friendly Assurance, the EAT holds that the statutory duty under UK law to consult with employee representatives in relation to collective redundancies is triggered when there is an actual "proposal" to dismiss employees.

• Date:

  1 August 2001

  Type:

  Employment law cases

  Collective redundancies: Employer failed to consult unions about ways of avoiding collective redundancies

  In Middlesbrough Borough Council v Transport and General Workers' Union and another, the EAT upholds an employment tribunal's finding of fact that an employer failed to consult representatives of two trade unions that it recognised, in respect of more than 100 employees whom it was proposing to make redundant within 90 days, about ways of avoiding the dismissals.

• Type:

  FAQs

  What should collective redundancy consultation be about?

• Date:

  1 September 2000

  Type:

  Employment law cases

  Collective redundancies: Imposition of new terms constituted proposed "dismissal as redundant"

  An employer that gave notice to terminate employees' existing contracts of employment, and offered to re-engage them on new terms, had a duty to consult employee representatives before imposing the new terms, holds the EAT in GMB v Man Truck & Bus UK Ltd.