-
- Date:
- 7 March 2011
- Type:
- Employment law cases
The Court of Appeal has overturned two High Court injunctions preventing trade unions ASLEF and the RMT from striking.
-
- Type:
- How to
Practical guidance on avoiding a dispute escalating into industrial action, including understanding when a strike or other action is lawful; negotiating with a trade union; mediation and arbitration; and obtaining an injunction.
-
- Date:
- 24 June 2010
- Type:
- Employment law cases
The Court of Appeal has handed down its full judgment overturning an injunction preventing British Airways cabin crew from striking.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
Helen Samuel, associate solicitor and Anna Bridges, associate solicitor, at Addleshaw Goddard, detail the latest rulings.
-
- Date:
- 30 April 2010
- Type:
- Employment law cases
The Court of Appeal has held that, where a union serves notice on the employer of intended industrial action, one notice is sufficient for both continuous and discontinuous industrial action.
-
- Date:
- 8 September 2009
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Sehmi v Gate Gourmet London Ltd; Sandhu and others v Gate Gourmet London Ltd EAT/0264/08 & EAT/0265/08, the EAT held that, while the withdrawal by an employee of his or her labour will not necessarily justify dismissal, in a situation where large numbers of employees deliberately absent themselves from work in a manner that is liable to do serious damage to the employer's business, dismissal of those taking part in the action will be reasonable, even where the absence is not prolonged.
-
- Date:
- 3 January 2008
- Type:
- Employment law cases
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has held that industrial action by a trade union in Sweden to prevent a Latvian company from paying low wages to workers posted from Latvia could not be justified.
-
- Date:
- 12 December 2007
- Type:
- Employment law cases
The High Court has held that an employer could deduct only 1/260th of salary from employees' pay in respect of a one-day strike, and not 1/228th, which discounted paid holiday.
-
- Date:
- 12 August 2005
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In R (on the application of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd) v Central Arbitration Committee, the Court of Appeal holds that the role of the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) had been intended by parliament to be a decision-making body in a specialist area not suitable for the intervention of the courts.
-
- Type:
- FAQs