-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Theedom v Nourish Trading Ltd (t/a CSP Recruitment) and another [2016] IRLR 866 HC, the High Court dismissed an employee's libel claim in respect of emails sent by his employer about his misconduct.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
David Malamatenios is partner at Colman Coyle solicitors. He rounds up the latest rulings.
-
- Type:
- Employment law guide
The law on final payments, including accrued salary and holiday pay, P45 obligations, and dealing with the return of property.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Holmes v Qinetiq Ltd [2016] IRLR 664 EAT, the EAT held the "Acas code of practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures" has no application where an employer does not allege culpable conduct by an employee. Accordingly, no uplift to compensation under s.207A of TULR(C)A could be applied where the employee was unfairly dismissed on ill-health grounds.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
Chris Cook is partner and head of employment and Keely Rushmore is senior associate at SA Law. They round up the latest rulings.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
An employment tribunal has held that an experienced employee should have appreciated the seriousness of breaching his employer's hygiene rules and it was appropriate for the employer to dismiss him.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that the "Acas code of practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures" does not apply to dismissals for some other substantial reason (SOSR) due to a breakdown in working relationships.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Novakovic v Tesco Stores Ltd EAT/0315/15, the EAT held that the employment tribunal failed to consider all relevant evidence when finding that the employee had affirmed the employer's repudiatory breach of contract.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
An employment tribunal has held that an employer fairly dismissed an employee for using a racist term in the presence of white colleagues. The tribunal was unimpressed with the claimant's arguments that he did not realise anyone was listening, did not intend to offend, and the word is "street talk" where he lives.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Morgan v Royal Mencap Society, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that an employment tribunal was wrong to strike out a whistleblowing claim on the basis that an employee's complaint about cramped working conditions was not "in the public interest". Naomi Clarkson explains this recent employment case.