Topics

Hazard identification and risk management

New and updated

  • Date:
    21 February 2003
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Sex discrimination: Failure to carry out risk assessment for pregnant woman is discrimination

    In Hardman v Mallon, t/a Orchard Lodge Nursing Home, the EAT holds that a failure to carry out a risk assessment in respect of a pregnant employee as required by the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 amounts to unlawful sex discrimination. This is because carrying out a risk assessment is one of the ways in which a woman's biological condition during and after pregnancy is given special protection.

  • Type:
    FAQs

    What are the key provisions of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999?

  • Date:
    31 December 2000
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Wells v West Hertfordshire Health Authority

    In Wells v West Hertfordshire Health Authority (2000) Current Law 2000/2982, it was ruled that, when informed by an employee of a back problem and medical advice that she should avoid demanding physical work, the employer should have carried out a risk assessment of the employee's tasks and in particular the employee's ability to perform them given her medical condition.

  • Type:
    Employment law cases

    Failure to assess risks may cause sex discrimination

    In Day v T Pickles Farms Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) says that an employer should not wait for written notification of an employee's pregnancy before carrying out a risk assessment, and that its failure to carry out an assessment may have caused the employee detriment within the provisions of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975.

  • Date:
    15 March 1999
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Sex discrimination: Failure to carry out risk assessment could have amounted to detriment

    In Day v T Pickles Farms Ltd, the EAT holds that an employer who failed to make an assessment of the risks to the health and safety of a woman of child-bearing age employed in a sandwich shop no later than the date she started working there, and certainly before she became pregnant, could thereby have subjected her to a "detriment" within the meaning of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975.

  • Date:
    1 January 1981
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Page v Freight Hire (Tank Haulage) Ltd

    In Page v Freight Hire (Tank Haulage) Ltd [1981] IRLR 13 EAT, the EAT held that the employer was protected by the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, section 51(1) because refusing to allow the employee to transport dimethyl formamide was necessary to comply with the employer's duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and was not an act of excessive caution.

About this topic

HR and legal information and guidance relating to hazard identification and risk management.