-
- Type:
- Legal timetable
Updated to reflect that the Regulations have been finalised.
-
- Type:
- Legal timetable
Updated to reflect the increase in employment tribunal award limits, effective from 6 April 2024.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Miller v University of Bristol ET/1400780/22, the employment tribunal held that the professor's anti-Zionist beliefs are protected under the Equality Act 2010, and that his summary dismissal was an act of direct philosophical belief discrimination and unfair.
-
- Type:
- Leading practice guides
Leading practice guidance discussing how employers can engage redundancy survivors through effective communication, consultation and collaboration during the redundancy process.
-
- Type:
- Leading practice guides
Leading practice guidance discussing the practical and emotional support employers can provide to employees to help them cope with changes in the workplace as a result of a redundancy programme.
-
- Type:
- How to
Updated to reflect that the Maternity Leave, Adoption Leave and Shared Parental Leave (Amendment) Regulations 2024, which will extend redundancy protection to employees returning from adoption leave, are in force from 6 April 2024.
-
- Type:
- How to
Updated to reflect the EAT's decision in Omar v Epping Forest District Citizens Advice, which confirmed that the relevant question for heat-of-the-moment resignations is whether the employee genuinely intended to resign.
-
- Date:
- 2 November 2023
- Type:
- Podcasts and webinars
We look at workplace scenarios that can strike fear into the heart of the most experienced HR professionals, including issues relating to: discipline and grievances; redundancy; and new legislation.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Alsnih v Al Quds Al-Arabi Publishing & Advertising, an employment tribunal held that the dismissal of an employee for refusing to use a work-related app on her personal phone was procedurally and substantively unfair.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Charalambous v National Bank of Greece, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that the employee's dismissal was fair even though the manager who made the decision to dismiss had not attended the disciplinary hearings.