-
- Type:
- Employment law guide
Updated to reflect the Labour Government's employment law proposals.
-
- Date:
- 22 April 2024
- Type:
- Commentary and insights
Part-time employment judge Tina Elliott looks at how to achieve a fair dismissal when a working relationship breaks down.
-
- Type:
- How to
Updated to reflect that government guidance on right to work checks no longer provides for a grace period during which an employee can make a late application to the EU settlement scheme and maintain the right to work with their current employer.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
We look at four employment tribunal cases in which the claimants argued that their employer's failure to make better use of the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme rendered their dismissal unfair.
-
- Date:
- 12 September 2021
- Type:
- Podcasts and webinars
We round up some of our most popular podcasts published this year.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Kirk v Citibank NA and others, an employment tribunal held that a senior banker who was dismissed following a redundancy process was subjected to direct age discrimination and unfairly dismissed.
-
- Date:
- 3 September 2019
- Type:
- Podcasts and webinars
We discuss common issues associated with dismissal for long-term poor attendance recently highlighted in the EAT decision of Kelly v Royal Mail Group.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Kelly v Royal Mail Group Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that a long-serving employee's dismissal for frequent absences in accordance with the employer's attendance policy was harsh but fair.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Hawkes v Ausin Group (UK) Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that the employer's failure to hold a meeting with a reservist employee, before making the decision to dismiss, did not make the dismissal for some other substantial reason unfair.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Afzal v East London Pizza Ltd t/a Dominos Pizza, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that an employee who was dismissed when he failed to produce evidence of his continuing right to work in the UK should have had the right to appeal.