-
- Date:
- 24 April 2018
- Type:
- Commentary and insights
Consultant editor Darren Newman considers the implications of a recent case involving a Jamaican bus driver who was dismissed when he could not provide the required documentation during his employer's audit of its workforce's right to work in the UK.
-
- Type:
- Letters and forms
A model letter to to seek an employee's agreement to the terms of a voluntary redundancy.
-
- Type:
- Letters and forms
A model letter to confirm an employee's dismissal following a voluntary redundancy programme.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Reilly v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council, the Supreme Court held that a head teacher was fairly dismissed for failing to disclose her association with a convicted sex offender.
-
- Date:
- 21 March 2018
- Type:
- Commentary and insights
Consultant editor Darren Newman considers a recent case in which the Supreme Court judges seemed to cast doubt on the long-established approach to misconduct dismissals set out in Burchell.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Really Easy Car Credit Ltd v Thompson, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) allowed the appeal and held that the employer was not obliged to revisit its decision to dismiss when it became aware that the employee was pregnant.
-
- Date:
- 9 March 2018
- Type:
- Podcasts and webinars
Max Winthrop, an employment law partner at Short Richardson and Forth LLP, joins us to discuss the best way to avoid tricky issues and pitfalls when managing redundancies.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Keeping Kids Company (in compulsory liquidation) v Smith and others, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruled that events occurring after redundancy proposals did not excuse a charity's obligation to consult collectively, but could potentially be relied on to reduce the amount of the protective award.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Guisado v Bankia SA and others, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) held that there is nothing in EU law to prevent a pregnant worker from being included in collective redundancies.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In NHS 24 v Pillar EAT/0051/16, the EAT held that the inclusion in an investigative report of details about previous conduct in respect of which no disciplinary action was taken did not render a misconduct dismissal unfair.