-
- Date:
- 30 September 2005
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Amicus v GBS Tooling Ltd (in administration), the EAT holds that, under s.189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, to make a protective award against an employer in respect of breaches of s.188, an employment tribunal is entitled and obliged to assess the seriousness of the breach, taking into account its nature and any mitigating circumstances.
-
- Date:
- 16 September 2005
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Scott & Co v Richardson, the EAT holds that the employment tribunal failed to apply the correct tests to discover whether the employer had some other substantial reason for dismissing the employee and substituted its own view of the evidence, leading to the conclusion that the employer had no other substantial reason for dismissal.
-
- Type:
- FAQs
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
Judith Harris of Addleshaw Goddard brings you a comprehensive update on the latest decisions that could affect your organisation, and provides advice on what to do about them.
-
- Date:
- 12 August 2005
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Forshaw and others v Archcraft Ltd, the EAT holds that the employment tribunal erred in holding that a dismissal for refusing to sign a contract of employment that contained an unreasonable restraint of trade clause was for "some other substantial reason".
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
This week's case round-up from Eversheds, covering constructive dismissal for 'some other substantial reason'.
-
- Type:
- How to
Practical guidance on dealing with the situation where an important client refuses to have an employee back on its site.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
This week's case round-up from Eversheds, covering constructive dismissal.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
Karen Smith and Sophy Robinson of Addleshaw Goddard bring you a comprehensive update on the latest decisions that could affect your organisation, and provide advice on what to do about them.
-
- Date:
- 29 April 2005
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Hardy v Tourism South East, the EAT holds that a proposal to redeploy 26 employees on the closure of a regional office amounted to a plan to dismiss 20 or more employees and fell within s.188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.