Topics

Recruitment

New and updated

  • Type:
    FAQs

    Does an employer have the right to insist on medical checks for all new employees?

  • Date:
    1 May 1998
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Effect of bias by interviewers

    In Marks & Spencer plc v Martins (19 December 1997) EOR79B, the Court of Appeal rules that it was an error for an industrial tribunal to find that the employer discriminated against an applicant on grounds of her race because its interviewers were guilty of "bias".

  • Date:
    1 June 1995
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    X v Commission of the European Communities

    In X v Commission of the European Communities [1995] IRLR 320 ECJ, the European Court of Justice held that, under the European Convention on Human Rights an individual has the right to refuse to undergo a medical examination, and that this right must be respected.

  • Date:
    1 March 1995
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Pakistani doctor discriminated against

    A Pakistani doctor who was not shortlisted for a medical post because he could not meet the job requirements was unlawfully indirectly discriminated against, rules an Edinburgh industrial tribunal (Chair: S Krietman) in Mian v Common Services Agency and Brotherston.

  • Date:
    1 March 1995
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    GOQ applied to 'ladies' lingerie' vacancy

    Being a woman was a genuine occupational qualification for the post of regional manager with "a specialist ladies' lingerie retailer", rules a Reading industrial tribunal (Chair: M C Craft) in Rowson v Contessa (Ladieswear) Ltd.

  • Date:
    1 March 1995
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Asian wouldn't 'fit in'

    A Sri Lankan-born candidate was discriminated against when his application for the post of director of community services was turned down, a Bury St Edmunds industrial tribunal (Chair: D R Crome) has ruled in Abraham v Fenland District Council.

  • Date:
    1 March 1995
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Failure to shortlist unlawful

    A failure to shortlist a black employee for interview for the job of senior social worker was unlawful discrimination, rules a Nottingham industrial tribunal (Chair: D R Sneath) in Charles v Nottinghamshire County Council.

  • Date:
    1 December 1994
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    "Women-only" post unlawful

    Rejecting the defence that being a woman was a "personal services" genuine occupational qualification for the post, a Nottingham industrial tribunal (Chair: D R Sneath) in Moult v Nottinghamshire County Council rules that it was unlawful to refuse an application from a man for a teaching post on women-only courses run by an all-women organisation.

  • Date:
    1 December 1994
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    "Nimble fingers": women wanted

    An employer who told the Employment Service that he wanted job vacancies to be filled by women "because of their nimble fingers", did not attempt to procure an unlawful act, according to a Birmingham industrial tribunal (Chair: A C Tickle) in Equal Opportunities Commission v (1) Storey and Bloor (2) JES Manufacturing Co.

  • Date:
    1 September 1994
    Type:
    Employment law cases

    Race bias against equality job applicant

    A Pakistani applicant who unsuccessfully applied for the post of senior equality adviser was discriminated against on the grounds of race, rules a Nottingham industrial tribunal majority (Chair: J H Bellis) in Ayub v Nottinghamshire County Council.