-
- Date:
- 6 April 2020
- Type:
- Commentary and insights
What should employers do if they have new hires due to start work during the current crisis? Jo Faragher asks HR professionals and recruitment specialists for their advice.
-
- Type:
- How to
Updated to reflect that terms about probationary periods must be included in the written statement of employment particulars, effective from 6 April 2020.
-
- Type:
- Letters and forms
A model confirmation of offer/formal offer of employment/appointment letter for use once all checks have been completed.
-
- Type:
- Survey analysis
Our 18th annual survey of the HR function reports on key metrics for the profession, including the ratio of HR practitioners to employees and budgets for HR activities and running costs.
-
- Type:
- Survey analysis
Wellbeing remains a priority for respondents to XpertHR's annual research of HR priorities, but employee engagement and retention is now a key business concern.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Badara v Pulse Healthcare Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that the employer should not have relied solely on negative Home Office checks when it dismissed the employee for failing to provide right to work documentation.
-
- Type:
- Leading practice guides
Updated to include a case study about a targeted recruitment campaign at a hotel group.
-
- Date:
- 23 August 2019
- Type:
- Case studies
Travelodge talks to XpertHR about its successful strategy of attracting out-of-work parents to help it address a shortfall in EU workers following Brexit.
-
- Date:
- 30 April 2019
- Type:
- Commentary and insights
We look at some of the initiatives that have been taken to boost recruitment in the police sector, and highlight what the police can learn from HM Prison and Probation Service's recruitment campaign.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In R (on the application of P) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and other appeals, the Supreme Court held that the criminal record checks rule requiring disclosure where a person has more than one conviction, regardless of the circumstances of the offences, is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.