Redundancy payments

New and updated

• Date:

  1 January 2004

  Type:

  Employment law cases

  Solectron Scotland Ltd v Roper and others

  In Solectron Scotland Ltd v Roper and others [2004] IRLR 4 EAT, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that the employment tribunal did not err in finding that enhanced redundancy terms over and above what was paid to the applicants on their dismissal, which formed part of their contracts of employment with their previous employer, BT, and to which they were entitled by virtue of the Transfer of Undertakings Regulations 1981, had not been removed by custom or practice.

• Type:

  Employment law cases

  Case round-up

  Our resident experts at Pinsents bring you a comprehensive update on all the latest decisions that could affect your organisation, and advice on what to do about them.

• Date:

  10 January 2003

  Type:

  Employment law cases

  Contracts of employment: Contractual entitlement to enhanced redundancy terms arose by custom and practice

  In Albion Automotive Ltd v Walker and others, the Court of Appeal upholds an employment tribunal's decision that an employer who made enhanced redundancy payments according to an agreed policy for a number of years created a custom and practice from which the tribunal could infer that the employer and/or its successors intended to be contractually bound to make those payments.

• Type:

  FAQs

  Can an employer require fixed-term employees to sign a redundancy waiver?

• Type:

  FAQs

  In what circumstances might an employee be entitled to a redundancy payment?

• Date:

  15 June 1996

  Type:

  Employment law cases

  Implied terms: No implied contractual right to enhanced redundancy pay

  In Quinn and others v Calder Industrial Materials Ltd the EAT upholds an industrial tribunal's ruling that the employer was not in breach of contract by failing to make enhanced redundancy payments to redundant employees.

• Date:

  1 February 1995

  Type:

  Employment law cases

  Redundancy: Relocation clause defeats redundancy claim

  An employee who agreed to relocate but later decided not to move was not dismissed by reason of redundancy, but rather because of his intention not to comply with the relocation clause in his contract, holds the EAT in Richardson and another v Applied Imaging International Ltd.

• Date:

  1 March 1993

  Type:

  Employment law cases

  Contracts of employment: Employer's attempt to withdraw enhanced redundancy scheme fails

  An employer had no right to withdraw unilaterally its employees' contractual entitlement to enhanced redundancy payments, holds the High Court in Lee and others v GEC Plessey Telecommunications.

• Date:

  14 April 1992

  Type:

  Employment law cases

  Allsop v North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council

  In Allsop v North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council [1992] 90 LGR 462 CA, the Court of Appeal held that payments made to employees by a local authority as compensation for redundancy under a voluntary severance scheme were unlawful as they exceeded the prescribed limits.

• Date:

  31 December 1981

  Type:

  Employment law cases

  Ross v Delrosa Caterers Ltd

  In Ross v Delrosa Caterers Ltd [1981] ICR 393 EAT, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that, although continuity of employment is broken where a redundancy payment has been paid to an employee and the contract of employment is renewed or the employee re-engaged under a new contract, this is the case only if the redundancy payment is a statutory redundancy payment.