-
- Date:
- 2 June 2025
- Type:
- Survey analysis
Organisations are focused on building employee engagement with their benefits offering, while making sure that the overall package remains competitive as well as affordable. The range of benefits offered remains wide, aiming to provide something for everyone.
-
- Type:
- Leading practice guides
Leading practice guidance discussing how to develop a health strategy focused on what the organisation hopes to achieve from offering a suite of health-related benefits. We also provide an overview of the types of health benefits available.
-
- Type:
- Leading practice guides
Leading practice guidance discussing the factors for employers to consider when choosing a health risk benefits provider.
-
- Type:
- Leading practice guides
Enhanced by creating five separate guides on creating an employee health benefits package, to help you find the guidance you need. This initial guide discusses the business case for investing in employee health benefits.
-
- Type:
- Leading practice guides
Leading practice guidance discussing how employers can offer and manage private medical insurance - one of the most common health-related benefits.
-
- Type:
- Leading practice guides
Leading practice guidance discussing what employers should consider when deciding to offer permanent health insurance, critical illness insurance, life assurance and/or cash plans as benefits to employees.
-
- Date:
- 11 July 2023
- Type:
- Survey analysis
Health and wellbeing benefits remain one of the main elements of any employer's package as they help employees in many different ways. We look at how the provision of such benefits has changed, and which are most popular in 2023.
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Awan v ICTS UK Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that an implied term of the contract of employment prohibited the employer from dismissing the employee for medical capability while he was entitled to receive long-term disability benefits.
-
- Type:
- FAQs
-
- Type:
- Employment law cases
The employer discriminated against an employee by withdrawing his permanent health insurance (PHI) benefits when he reached the age of 55, found the employment tribunal in this age discrimination case.